SuperBills12 Posted March 29, 2005 Posted March 29, 2005 Aside from Bledsoe, which really wasn't a surprise cut, my vote goes for Josh Reed...I just don't see any confidence from him...He was supposed to be the number 2 guy, instead got bounced to 3 and sometimes 4 on the depth chart
OnTheRocks Posted March 29, 2005 Posted March 29, 2005 Sam Adams. oh i know....they just let Pat Williams walk away..but, you asked for a suprise cut. what happens if Sam comes into camp really really out of shape and can't give 100% and shows what he did when he got benched in that game (i don't remember the exact game) this past season? personally you know what I would love to see? a switch to a 3-4 Defense.....let Sam Adams go, and bring in Jamie Sharper. The Texans are looking to trade him or cut him.
BuffaloWings Posted March 29, 2005 Posted March 29, 2005 Aside from Bledsoe, which really wasn't a surprise cut, my vote goes for Josh Reed...I just don't see any confidence from him...He was supposed to be the number 2 guy, instead got bounced to 3 and sometimes 4 on the depth chart 289607[/snapback] Based on his performances in 2003 and 2004, this wouldn't be that much of a surprise.
beausox Posted March 29, 2005 Posted March 29, 2005 Ryan Denney 289608[/snapback] Clump, I admire your knowledge of the cap but evidently your valuable expertise does not extend to talent analysis. Denney may very well move to tight end. Even if that does not occur his value as a swing lineman ( as a pass rushing tackle on third and passing downs as well as a defensive end who can drop in coverage in zone blitz situations) is great. TD and MM highly value versatility and two-fer players. Of course your choice of Denney as a surprise cut may only have cap-related value.
Mark VI Posted March 29, 2005 Posted March 29, 2005 Sam Adams. oh i know....they just let Pat Williams walk away..but, you asked for a suprise cut. what happens if Sam comes into camp really really out of shape and can't give 100% and shows what he did when he got benched in that game (i don't remember the exact game) this past season? personally you know what I would love to see? a switch to a 3-4 Defense.....let Sam Adams go, and bring in Jamie Sharper. The Texans are looking to trade him or cut him. 289612[/snapback] Takeo Spikes. I'm trying to think like you.
plenzmd1 Posted March 29, 2005 Posted March 29, 2005 personally you know what I would love to see? a switch to a 3-4 Defense.....let Sam Adams go, and bring in Jamie Sharper. The Texans are looking to trade him or cut him. 289612[/snapback] And who are we brining in to coordinate this defense? I really cannot see any surprises. Maybe, Troy V if he really makes a stink about the permanent switch to FS.
Campy Posted March 29, 2005 Posted March 29, 2005 Sam Adams. what happens if Sam comes into camp really really out of shape and can't give 100% and shows what he did when he got benched in that game (i don't remember the exact game) this past season? 289612[/snapback] My first response was but after thinking about it for a minute, I realized that if he comes in with the same attitude that got him benched that could actually be a positive. If you recall, that was a turning point of sorts for him, and he played like a monster the rest of the season. Hell, I hope he does show up with that attitude!
Campy Posted March 29, 2005 Posted March 29, 2005 Maybe, Troy V if he really makes a stink about the permanent switch to FS. 289625[/snapback] Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought TV knew it was coming sooner or later and has said that however he can help the team is fine as long as he can be on the field and contribute.
UConn James Posted March 29, 2005 Posted March 29, 2005 Sam Adams.oh i know....they just let Pat Williams walk away..but, you asked for a suprise cut. what happens if Sam comes into camp really really out of shape and can't give 100% and shows what he did when he got benched in that game (i don't remember the exact game) this past season? 289612[/snapback] The scenario isn't exactly right, but that was in the Bengals game. Fat Sam wasn't benched. Jerry Gray kept Ron Edwards in on more plays than usual b/c he was tearing it up and getting great penetration into the backfield and busting up plays. Adams got a little huffy about it during and a little after the game that he lost playing time. Gray said BFD and stated the above reasons why Edwards was kept in, and he and Adams apparently made nice. Rest assured, he'll be wearing a Bills uniform this season, and rest assured, that uniform will still look like 10 pounds of stuffing in a 1-pound bag.
ganesh Posted March 29, 2005 Posted March 29, 2005 Travis Henry, if no deal is completed. 289637[/snapback] I don't think the bills have any rights over him in 2006, unless they put the Franchise Tag
Bill from NYC Posted March 29, 2005 Posted March 29, 2005 I don't think the bills have any rights over him in 2006, unless they put theFranchise Tag 289641[/snapback] Yeah, but he asked about 05, no?
LabattBlue Posted March 29, 2005 Posted March 29, 2005 Denney may very well move to tight end. 289621[/snapback] I haven't seen anything on Denney moving to TE. Where did you read this?
Steven in MD Posted March 29, 2005 Posted March 29, 2005 Moulds....Williams.....Wire.....Moorman....No player is ever safe on a TD team. If he can find talent for less money, you are gone!
Rico Posted March 29, 2005 Posted March 29, 2005 Would Coy Wire count as a surprise? How about Sam Aiken?
Realist Posted March 29, 2005 Posted March 29, 2005 Moulds....Williams.....Wire.....Moorman....No player is ever safe on a TD team. If he can find talent for less money, you are gone! 289660[/snapback] Isn't that the case with any GM...except for Washington that is.
Beerball Posted March 29, 2005 Posted March 29, 2005 Takeo Spikes. I'm trying to think like you. 289622[/snapback] You should learn to stand on your own too feet. Stop looking to others and start looking within yourself. Common man, you can do it.
Steven in MD Posted March 29, 2005 Posted March 29, 2005 Isn't that the case with any GM...except for Washington that is. 289670[/snapback] No some GM's actually value talent and team chemistry.
Recommended Posts