Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

If he did it, yes he won't escape that.

 

And he's apparently planning on suing the city.  If the case is sealed, does that mean the city can mount no real defense?

 

Well the DA has already proven he’s corrupt, now he’s proven he’s a freaking stupid moron for failing to indemnify the city against such nuisance suits.

 

Maybe Michele can intervene with the judges and have any lawsuit dismissed. Or maybe she’ll intervene the other way, and have her lying pal awarded $100M.

.

Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, apuszczalowski said:

Actors may welcome him back, but the exec's (producers, studios, Etc.) Wont be so eager to bring him back to roles and risk people boycotting the show/movie because of him. He wasnt very big of an actor before this, he doesnt have the star power to help him come back like bigger stars.....

 

The flipside is he just sky rocketed his appeal in a niche that may rabidly support him. Even if 90% of Netflix viewers boycott a movie, if he now takes almost the entirety of the remaining 10% it can be a successful release (I know the percentages are random and arbitrary and not accurate estimates even)

Edited by NoSaint
Posted
12 hours ago, apuszczalowski said:

Actors may welcome him back, but the exec's (producers, studios, Etc.) Wont be so eager to bring him back to roles and risk people boycotting the show/movie because of him. He wasnt very big of an actor before this, he doesnt have the star power to help him come back like bigger stars.....

 

Actors may welcome back

Exec's might welcome him back if they thought he could make money for them

 

But the real question is, will the nobody's behind the camera welcome him back?  Writers, show runners, camera operators, make-up specialists, etc?  These are the people who make a successful show but are paid significantly less than the on screen actors.  Are they going to hitch themselves to somebody whose off-screen behavior or on-line presence may cause a backlash that costs them their livelihood?

Posted
2 hours ago, /dev/null said:

 

Actors may welcome back

Exec's might welcome him back if they thought he could make money for them

 

But the real question is, will the nobody's behind the camera welcome him back?  Writers, show runners, camera operators, make-up specialists, etc?  These are the people who make a successful show but are paid significantly less than the on screen actors.  Are they going to hitch themselves to somebody whose off-screen behavior or on-line presence may cause a backlash that costs them their livelihood?

 

Maybe I'm not looking in the right places, but I can't remember the last time I've seen such a unified response from almost everyone on this.  It seems like everyone short of family and friend is so against this guy.  I can't see this working out too well for him and landing new roles.  He's poison for at least a few months anyway.  I don't know how long that lasts.

Posted

when you are granted a buttkissing softball interview with a "news source" and you have to insist "it's all true!!!' 16 times during it.....

 

Posted
10 minutes ago, ShadyBillsFan said:

Jussie is an idiot. 

 

 

Is this really a case for the FBI though?  

 

not really, but might be a slow case-cycle at the moment

 

 

 

maybe the FBI can locate one Chicago powerbroker that doesn't deserve a long stretch

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
21 minutes ago, ShadyBillsFan said:

Jussie is an idiot. 

 

 

Is this really a case for the FBI though?  

Absolutely if there's probable evidence of corruption. It's a symptom of a bigger problem.

Edited by RaoulDuke79
  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
34 minutes ago, ShadyBillsFan said:

Jussie is an idiot. 

 

 

Is this really a case for the FBI though?  

 

Well evidently Foxx lied and didn't actually recuse herself so that's something.

Posted

When you have that kind of power in your corner, is it any shock that your bravado would be so high?   allegedly

 

9 minutes ago, RaoulDuke79 said:

These people keep poking the dog this is going to end up a lot worse than it already is.

 

Fox News: Jussie Smollett's attorney demands apology from mayor, police chief: 
'Jussie has paid enough'.
https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/jussie-smollets-attorney-demands-apology-from-mayor-police-chief-jussie-has-paid-enough

 

 

Posted

Charles Barkley summed it up best what he said everybody involved in this loses.

1 minute ago, The Poojer said:

When you have that kind of power in your corner, is it any shock that your bravado would be so high?   allegedly

 

It's a small wonder, but I'd be willing to bet there may be some cops or friends of cops that may not be on the up and up that wouldn't be opposed to seeing some type of harm come to Mr. Smollett. 

Posted

Well, he wanted attention....and he got attention. Pee Wee Herman says not all attention is good attention. That’s the type of attention he got and about how he will be remembered for his 15 minutes of shame. 

Posted
20 minutes ago, RaoulDuke79 said:

Charles Barkley summed it up best what he said everybody involved in this loses.

 

Could Trump be a winner in all this, since everybody is so pissed off.  

Posted
2 minutes ago, bbb said:

 

Could Trump be a winner in all this, since everybody is so pissed off.  

Nah....he's already so polarizing I think the people who like him will still like him and those who dislike him will still dislike him as well. I really dont think there's much he can do either way to change people's minds. 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
6 hours ago, RaoulDuke79 said:

These people keep poking the dog this is going to end up a lot worse than it already is.

 

Fox News: Jussie Smollett's attorney demands apology from mayor, police chief: 
'Jussie has paid enough'.
https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/jussie-smollets-attorney-demands-apology-from-mayor-police-chief-jussie-has-paid-enough

 

 

Exactly, what he really needed to do is just say sorry, thank people for their support and go away while not speaking of what happened again.

He should be thanking whatever he can that he didn't end up with anything worse, and possibly see if that Subway is hiring.

 

Sometimes you just need to realise you screwed up, got lucky things didn't end up worse, and just never speak of it again. Instead he took the route of trying to continue trying to get attention and push things further which usually makes things worse when those your continuing to piss off (the cops) are going to make things worse and get you on something else. Kind of reminds me of OJ, instead of realizing he literally got away with murder and getting out of the public spotlight to live the rest of his life free, he continued to try and get some spotlight and made things worse which lead him to jail on something stupid.

 

The support he is getting reminds of of the support that was given to Michael Jackson, and even OJ at first where they believed he was innocent because of race. Had he been white, he would not have been given the support and they would be blaming him getting away with it on him being white and white privilege.

  • Like (+1) 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...