3rdnlng Posted January 28, 2019 Posted January 28, 2019 3 minutes ago, Doc Brown said: I'm hoping he drives the Starbucks stock price down. What? Making them then raise prices to up profits?
Doc Brown Posted January 28, 2019 Posted January 28, 2019 2 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: What? Making them then raise prices to up profits? No. They're a solidly run company that's always produced consistent earnings. Panicky investors could dump their stock as I've been waiting for it to go below 60 for a while now.
row_33 Posted January 28, 2019 Posted January 28, 2019 14 minutes ago, Doc Brown said: No. They're a solidly run company that's always produced consistent earnings. Panicky investors could dump their stock as I've been waiting for it to go below 60 for a while now. What’s wrong, Starbucks won’t let you use their bathroom to take a nap?
3rdnlng Posted January 28, 2019 Posted January 28, 2019 32 minutes ago, Doc Brown said: No. They're a solidly run company that's always produced consistent earnings. Panicky investors could dump their stock as I've been waiting for it to go below 60 for a while now. Looking to buy?
Doc Brown Posted January 29, 2019 Posted January 29, 2019 3 hours ago, 3rdnlng said: Looking to buy? I hope the left pushes a massive Starbucks boycott.
Numark3 Posted January 29, 2019 Posted January 29, 2019 Idk, he seems better than every name being thrown out for the dems...
Deranged Rhino Posted January 29, 2019 Posted January 29, 2019 1 hour ago, Crayola64 said: Idk, he seems better than every name being thrown out for the dems... Which is why the left is terrified of him running.
Numark3 Posted January 29, 2019 Posted January 29, 2019 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: Which is why the left is terrified of him running. I have never considered voting independent (they are historically awful candidates). But I'll give this some thought. 1
Deranged Rhino Posted January 29, 2019 Posted January 29, 2019 Just now, Crayola64 said: I have never considered voting independent (they are historically awful candidates). But I'll give this some thought. Both sides see an independent run from an "outsider" as the best way to win in 2020. The left wants someone like Kasich or Mittens to run to split the Trump base - that's their best shot at winning (imo). But the right wants to do the same (possibily with Schultz) and split the left base to assure Trump wins. A lot of dark money will go towards independent candidates in this cycle (imo)... it's going to be a free for all.
Numark3 Posted January 29, 2019 Posted January 29, 2019 2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Which is why the left is terrified of him running. And yes, it will be an issue for the left, and an independent won't get elected, which is a shame. The two parties are catering so much to their loud minorities that they really arent that representative anymore, imo.
row_33 Posted January 29, 2019 Posted January 29, 2019 THe more the merrier but Trump and Hillary take no prisoners
KD in CA Posted January 29, 2019 Posted January 29, 2019 We already have a middle of the road President, no?
Nanker Posted January 29, 2019 Posted January 29, 2019 The Dems are apoplectic about him running. “Heckled within minutes.”
row_33 Posted January 29, 2019 Posted January 29, 2019 He’s a coffee billionaire, thst should win him the office Don’t even need a campaign or election, just drop him into the White House apparently.
/dev/null Posted January 29, 2019 Posted January 29, 2019 35 minutes ago, row_33 said: Don’t even need a campaign or election, just drop him into the White House apparently.
Doc Brown Posted January 29, 2019 Posted January 29, 2019 I can see the debate stage. Two old white egotistical billionaires and Kamala Harris. Are we sure this doesn't hurt Trump more?
snafu Posted January 29, 2019 Posted January 29, 2019 I doubt Schultz thinks he can win. It look more like he wants to move the Democrats away from the far left. The only way he can do that is by running in the middle and making the D candidate move toward him to take away his votes. In some ways, the people complaining about this being a billionaire vanity play are right; but the vanity might be Schultz attempting to drive policy. He’s made campaign contributions in the past, but it appears that he hasn’t gotten the policy results he wanted.
BeginnersMind Posted January 29, 2019 Posted January 29, 2019 1 hour ago, Doc Brown said: I can see the debate stage. Two old white egotistical billionaires and Kamala Harris. Are we sure this doesn't hurt Trump more? There is way too much sifting still to go before I can care much about Harris or any of the other names. Im not even convinced Trump will run again yet.
Nanker Posted January 29, 2019 Posted January 29, 2019 22 minutes ago, snafu said: I doubt Schultz thinks he can win. It look more like he wants to move the Democrats away from the far left. The only way he can do that is by running in the middle and making the D candidate move toward him to take away his votes. In some ways, the people complaining about this being a billionaire vanity play are right; but the vanity might be Schultz attempting to drive policy. He’s made campaign contributions in the past, but it appears that he hasn’t gotten the policy results he wanted. It's high comedy to see him being criticized by the likes of Bloomberg and the other Billionaire Dumbs.
snafu Posted January 29, 2019 Posted January 29, 2019 1 hour ago, Nanker said: It's high comedy to see him being criticized by the likes of Bloomberg and the other Billionaire Dumbs. Granny Bloomberg likes to lecture. Notice how nobody threatens to boycott his news outlet for dumping $100 million into Congressional races? D's will take the old rich white guy's money, no problem. 1
Recommended Posts