Pine Barrens Mafia Posted June 21, 2019 Posted June 21, 2019 https://www.dailywire.com/news/48716/british-female-judge-orders-young-woman-have-hank-berrien?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=benshapiro This kind of thing could never happen in the enlightened and civilized west, could it? 1
B-Man Posted June 24, 2019 Posted June 24, 2019 Smug vandal rips out pro-life crosses, compares pro-lifers to flat-Earthers. On 6/21/2019 at 3:43 PM, Joe in Winslow said: https://www.dailywire.com/news/48716/british-female-judge-orders-young-woman-have-hank-berrien?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=benshapiro This kind of thing could never happen in the enlightened and civilized west, could it? So much for autonomous control of her own body.
DC Tom Posted June 24, 2019 Posted June 24, 2019 7 minutes ago, B-Man said: So much for autonomous control of her own body. She's a ward of the state, deemed incapable of making her own decisions. Her mother isn't her legal guardian, and her doctors have no authority outside expressing their medical judgement. Really, this was so clear-cut, it shouldn't have even gone to court. The State's authority supersedes everyone else's. This, by they way...state authority exercised for the health of the community? Fascism.
row_33 Posted June 24, 2019 Posted June 24, 2019 14 minutes ago, DC Tom said: She's a ward of the state, deemed incapable of making her own decisions. Her mother isn't her legal guardian, and her doctors have no authority outside expressing their medical judgement. Really, this was so clear-cut, it shouldn't have even gone to court. The State's authority supersedes everyone else's. This, by they way...state authority exercised for the health of the community? Fascism. decisions have to made, and quickly
whatdrought Posted June 24, 2019 Posted June 24, 2019 2 hours ago, DC Tom said: She's a ward of the state, deemed incapable of making her own decisions. Her mother isn't her legal guardian, and her doctors have no authority outside expressing their medical judgement. Really, this was so clear-cut, it shouldn't have even gone to court. The State's authority supersedes everyone else's. This, by they way...state authority exercised for the health of the community? Fascism. I thought you were defending this for a minute. Had me worried... So much for a womans body and her choice. This will be in America before we know it.
B-Man Posted June 24, 2019 Posted June 24, 2019 U.K. Court of Appeal Overturns Ruling Ordering Mentally Disabled ... https://www.wsj.com › World › Europe › U.K. BREAKING NEWS: Appeals Court Overturns Judge’s Ruling Forcing Mentally Disabled Woman to Have Abortion Doctors argued that the abortion is in the woman’s best interests — even though social workers and her own family disagree. Her legal team argued there is no evidence to show that aborting her baby is beneficial for her. The woman’s mother has even offered to care for the grandchild but the judge ruled otherwise. Mrs Justice Lieven wrote in her ruling: “I think she would like to have a baby in the same way she would like to have a nice doll.” But the woman’s mother is appealing the ruling. The woman’s mother, who is a member of the Nigerian Igbo community and a Catholic, is fighting the decision. She says abortion is against her Catholic religious beliefs and her cultural beliefs. She also said that she would be able to care for the baby, and that her daughter’s abilities and wishes were being undermined. Doctors must not abort mentally-ill woman's baby, appeal judges rule Mon 24 Jun 2019 By Press Association A judge on Friday concluded that a pregnancy termination was in the woman's best interests. Mrs Justice Lieven had analysed evidence at a hearing in the Court of Protection, where issues relating to people who lack the mental capacity to make decisions are considered, in London. But three appeal judges on Monday over-ruled that decision after the woman's mother, a former midwife, mounted a challenge. Lord Justice McCombe, Lady Justice King and Lord Justice Peter Jackson had considered the challenge at a Court of Appeal hearing in London. They said they would give reasons for their decision at a later date. https://www.premier.org.uk/News/UK/Doctors-must-not-abort-mentally-ill-woman-s-baby-appeal-judges-rule?utm_source=SPUC+News+List&utm_campaign=5c8aece232-ask+MP+to+contact+Sajid+Javid_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_826f492851-5c8aece232-138710545&mc_cid=5c8aece232&mc_eid=8acb74a2ca
B-Man Posted June 24, 2019 Posted June 24, 2019 Judge keeps Missouri’s Planned Parenthood open, but abortionists won’t perform ‘unethical’ pelvic exam
B-Man Posted June 28, 2019 Posted June 28, 2019 Hit the arrow..................This is a human being. We all know it.
row_33 Posted June 28, 2019 Posted June 28, 2019 On 6/24/2019 at 7:20 PM, B-Man said: Judge keeps Missouri’s Planned Parenthood open, but abortionists won’t perform ‘unethical’ pelvic exam it's a dirty lowdown scummy thing to be dealing in killing people....
B-Man Posted July 6, 2019 Posted July 6, 2019 Just a quick (LIBERAL) reminder.......................no other opinions are allowed “Unplanned,” the movie about one of the youngest Planned Parenthood directors in the United States who resigned and became a pro-life activist after being asked to assist in an abortion at thirteen weeks’ gestation, was released in March (and was quickly labeled “Drama/Propaganda” by Google). Now the movie is set to open in 24 Canadian theaters, so outrage by the pro-abortion crowd is ginning up again, but this time maple syrup-flavored. Quote Rebecca@RebeccaO1340 Time to boycott Cineplex and Landmark theaters! I will not be going to any chains that show anti choice propaganda in any of their theaters. Controversial anti-abortion film Unplanned to hit more than 24 Canadian theatres h ttps://www.thestar.com/entertainment/movies/2019/07/03/controversial-anti-abortion-film-unplanned-to-hit-more-than-24-canadian-theatres.html … via @torontostar 7:07 PM - Jul 4, 2019 Note The Toronto Star’s helpful reporting that critics panned it (shocker!) and many called it propaganda. Note also the obligatory “controversial” label attached — one that would never be reflexively applied to a pro-choice film. The Star reports: But the Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada calls it “a dangerous piece of anti-abortion propaganda” containing “vicious falsehoods.” “It preaches an absolutist and extreme case against abortion that has nothing to do with reality,” the ARCC said in a statement. “Because of the film’s demonization of abortion providers, ARCC fears the movie could incite fanatics to commit acts of harassment or violence against clinics or doctors.” First, we’d be willing to bet no one at the ARCC has actually seen it, and second, at least one theater in Alberta will have security on hand after it “had a lot of threats” over screening the film.
B-Man Posted July 16, 2019 Posted July 16, 2019 CHANGE: Boosted by Trump Judges, 9th Circuit Gives Pro-Lifers a Win. .
B-Man Posted July 17, 2019 Posted July 17, 2019 They kicked her out because Wen, a certified MD wouldn't say trans can't have abortions... Holy God... The Left/dems/progressives 1 2
Hedge Posted July 17, 2019 Posted July 17, 2019 In this letter below, she states it's due to PP pushing advocacy to the front as it's main mission, not healthcare. This would seem to jive with her reported refusal to go full-Leftist in her statements. 1
B-Man Posted July 17, 2019 Posted July 17, 2019 Quote Stephen MillerVerified account @redsteeze FollowFollow @redsteeze You know this is about women’s healthcare when they fired one of the most well known medical experts in women’s healthcare in the country because she wouldn’t along with woke redefining of medical biology. 5:04 PM - 16 Jul 2019 . "The new Board leadership has determined that the priority of Planned Parenthood moving forward will be to double down on abortion advocacy." So your mammogram lie....................was just that.
Recommended Posts