Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, row_33 said:

 

not sure if you have a RIGHT to health insurance for playing football

 

the fear is 30 years down the road, now that ex-players with Parkinsons are blaming it all on football and suing

 

you have a RIGHT to be offered auto insurance up here, but your premium may be $100,000 a year

 

 

 

its not a right , its paid for. I also shouldn't be forced to buy it - that is extortion.

 

 

Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, Buffalo Barbarian said:

 

its not a right , its paid for. I also shouldn't be forced to buy it - that is extortion.

 

 

 

a pro athlete is an employee, as opposed to Pop Warner and NCAA players

 

it adds another dimension to workers comp and coverage for employees

 

give it a five minute skim if you have any interest, i was reminded of a few things since my last work on insurance investigations...

Edited by row_33
Posted
10 minutes ago, TAinLA said:

Madden Football

 

is that where you learn to fake-work the clock down to 13 seconds and then blame the pros for leaving 80 on the clock when scoring a go-ahead TD?

 

 

Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

 

I’m sure no one will figure out how to sustain this $20 billion industry.  ?

 

that's kind of blase about $20billion, it's all leveraged to the hilt....

 

 

nobody will insure it down the road

 

it will wipe out football below the pro level without insurance

 

Edited by row_33
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

We write 9 of the teams through our agency. We have the Saints in our office and meeting with the Chiefs next week.

 

This article is a little overblown. There aren’t many players but there are still some and that’s where they all end up (Berkeley still covers head injuries). That’s the umbrella market to use. The league encourages teams to carry a $100M umbrella. Most carry somewhere between $50M & $200M (Saints carry $75m). 

Posted
13 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

We write 9 of the teams through our agency. We have the Saints in our office and meeting with the Chiefs next week.

 

This article is a little overblown. There aren’t many players but there are still some and that’s where they all end up (Berkeley still covers head injuries). That’s the umbrella market to use. The league encourages teams to carry a $100M umbrella. Most carry somewhere between $50M & $200M (Saints carry $75m). 

 

thanks!!!

 

and below the NFL ?

 

 

Posted
19 minutes ago, row_33 said:

 

is that where you learn to fake-work the clock down to 13 seconds and then blame the pros for leaving 80 on the clock when scoring a go-ahead TD?

 

 

oddly yes, but no one gets hurt, except the TV - when someone throws the remote at it after losing.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, TAinLA said:

oddly yes, but no one gets hurt, except the TV - when someone throws the remote at it after losing.

 

i see...

 

i guess with perfect hindsight a team could have shaved 30 seconds off the clock before giving it back to Tom, but there are a ton of real factors involved and lots of really improbable disasters can suddenly arise...

 

:D

 

 

Posted
12 minutes ago, row_33 said:

 

thanks!!!

 

and below the NFL ?

 

 

The NFL handles the work comp (I think for all teams). So the umbrella is sitting over the employers liability portion of the comp (as well as the GL and auto). 

 

We write the GL, cyber, crime, $75m umbrella, employment practices (tough placement for that too), auto and some property for the Saints. It’s about $1.1M in premium which really is quite cheap. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
25 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

We write 9 of the teams through our agency. We have the Saints in our office and meeting with the Chiefs next week.

 

This article is a little overblown. There aren’t many players but there are still some and that’s where they all end up (Berkeley still covers head injuries). That’s the umbrella market to use. The league encourages teams to carry a $100M umbrella. Most carry somewhere between $50M & $200M (Saints carry $75m). 

 

Good to know.

 

Seems the sports media is intent on taking down tackle football, which is odd considering it's such a huge source of income.  I don't understand where the self-righteousness comes from.

 

Safety is paramount and this isn't the first time the game has received so much attention for injuries.  

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2014/05/29/teddy-roosevelt-helped-save-football-with-a-white-house-meeting-in-1905/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.45d6427d5e76

 

 

Edited by BillsVet
Posted
1 hour ago, row_33 said:

 

 

 

We all say that, and everyone has known smoking is hazardous to one's health (officially announced in the early 1960s), but when people get sick they sue everyone they can shake a stick at.

 

 

People can sue all they want, doesn't mean they are going to win.

Posted
26 minutes ago, Mark Vader said:

People can sue all they want, doesn't mean they are going to win.

 

it kinda does when the victim class gets enough power...

 

 

Posted
3 hours ago, papazoid said:

self insure

 

hold harmless clauses

Exactly; become an ERISA compliant "pool" type plan funded by the proceeds of the TV packages and potentially additional fees assessed as part of each player's contract, and cut out the middleman so to speak. As for the college/high school/youth leagues, that's another matter however. 

1 hour ago, Mark Vader said:

People can sue all they want, doesn't mean they are going to win.

Sometimes the "win" comes from entering into a settlement where the deep pocket(s) cough up enough to cut off their liability exposure risk and costs of litigation--merits of the case itself may or may not have as much to do with it, sad to say. 

Posted
15 minutes ago, NoHuddleKelly12 said:

Exactly; become an ERISA compliant "pool" type plan funded by the proceeds of the TV packages and potentially additional fees assessed as part of each player's contract, and cut out the middleman so to speak. As for the college/high school/youth leagues, that's another matter however. 

Sometimes the "win" comes from entering into a settlement where the deep pocket(s) cough up enough to cut off their liability exposure risk and costs of litigation--merits of the case itself may or may not have as much to do with it, sad to say. 

 

so just snap your fingers and BAM it is solved

 

 

 

what about the NFL creatively denying liability

 

 

Posted
7 minutes ago, row_33 said:

 

so just snap your fingers and BAM it is solved

 

 

 

what about the NFL creatively denying liability

 

 

Oh don't get me wrong--many attorneys will make a boatload of cash over many years along the way to iron out the contractual niceties this would take, and as for denial of liability, well, that's usually the first insurance defense mechanism to pursue regardless of which insurer you want to reference--how would it be that much different?  

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, NoHuddleKelly12 said:

Oh don't get me wrong--many attorneys will make a boatload of cash over many years along the way to iron out the contractual niceties this would take, and as for denial of liability, well, that's usually the first insurance defense mechanism to pursue regardless of which insurer you want to reference--how would it be that much different?  

 

thanks for your input, much appreciated, bears keeping an eye on over the next few years

 

friends think football will go the way of boxing and horse racing over the next decade

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, row_33 said:

 

thanks for your input, much appreciated, bears keeping an eye on over the next few years

 

friends think football will go the way of boxing and horse racing over the next decade

 

What do you think is, or are, the most likely candidates to replace it as the top of the proverbial mountain in the sports landscape? Some might say soccer, with growing demographic shifts inclined to push that along, along with player safety concerns (here in Atlanta, it's been quite something to witness the growth/crowds present for the brand new Atlanta United franchise that just won the MLS cup to boot). Could baseball mount a serious comeback? 

 

The people must always have "bread and circuses" to keep them full and entertained.

Posted
15 minutes ago, NoHuddleKelly12 said:

What do you think is, or are, the most likely candidates to replace it as the top of the proverbial mountain in the sports landscape? Some might say soccer, with growing demographic shifts inclined to push that along, along with player safety concerns (here in Atlanta, it's been quite something to witness the growth/crowds present for the brand new Atlanta United franchise that just won the MLS cup to boot). Could baseball mount a serious comeback? 

 

The people must always have "bread and circuses" to keep them full and entertained.

 

 

hmmmm... maybe a disappearance of actually watching sporting events for 3-4 hours at a clip?

 

just put robots out there so people can play with their iPhones non-stop at the game and make a bet every 10 seconds?

 

soccer is a drag mostly, you can't force a superior team to care out there is they don't feel like it for 75 minutes

 

 

 

 

 

 

×
×
  • Create New...