Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, LABillzFan said:

 

 

Damn, this just gets worse. How in the effin' world does the left lose their mind like this? Read this dude's thread about what the left did to his brother and family...all because of a FAKE news story that the left just HAD to push.

 

You leftists have lost your effin' minds. You should all be embarrassed. Every freaking last one of your dirtbags. You make this country suck ass.

 

 

Not even the right kid in the video.

 

DxT7y1BWoAA4LEv.jpg

Posted (edited)
13 hours ago, Paulus said:

I hate how people so flamboyantly throw around the fact someone was in the military. Like I give AF. Or, that service somehow obliges someone to be put on a pedestal. He was there for a political issue, and politics followed. His service is of ZERO CONSEQUENCE.

 

If a person served in the military it does not make their opinions any more important.

 

However if a person IS a Viet Nam veteran who actually served IN Viet Nam, That's a little bit different. That was as some F%$ked up Sh!t our country put them through. They DESERVE our respect IMHO.

Edited by reddogblitz
Posted
3 hours ago, Doc Brown said:

Not even the right kid in the video.

 

DxT7y1BWoAA4LEv.jpg

The one in the maga hat has been tampered with to make him look hillbilly. No proof or anything just looking at it I get the vibe

3 hours ago, reddogblitz said:

 

If a person served in the military it does not make their opinions any more important.

 

However if a person IS a Viet Nam veteran who actually served IN Viet Nam, That's a little bit different. That was as some F%$ked up Sh!t our country put them through. They DESERVE our respect IMHO.

Yes. Stand up for me and my fellow vietkongians!

Posted (edited)

Dear Liberals,

 

The reason America is amazing is because of white men. This country would have never amounted to a damn thing without us, and it’s incapable of amounting to anything without us. 

 

Also, remember today, on MLK Day, that MLK was a worthless husband, and pastor. Martin never could keep his dick in his pants. He put his dick ahead of his religion, cause, and family on a routine basis. To me, that’s not a man worth celebrating. But he was a good orator. 

 

And lets be honest — most of the reasons minorities don’t like white bro’s is is because they’re jealous of our success. Sorry we’re so clever and awesome. 

Edited by The_Dude
Posted
3 hours ago, reddogblitz said:

 

If a person served in the military it does not make their opinions any more important.

 

However if a person IS a Viet Nam veteran who actually served IN Viet Nam, That's a little bit different. That was as some F%$ked up Sh!t our country put them through. They DESERVE our respect IMHO.

You're beating the wrong drum. While our veterans, and especially war zone veterans, deserve our respect for their time "in country" they do not get a pass for acting like a petulant child to further an agenda that they can't even convey.

Posted
3 hours ago, reddogblitz said:

 

If a person served in the military it does not make their opinions any more important.

 

However if a person IS a Viet Nam veteran who actually served IN Viet Nam, That's a little bit different. That was as some F%$ked up Sh!t our country put them through. They DESERVE our respect IMHO.

 

Thats definitley incorrect. 

 

Most likely you never served based based on your statement. 

 

A very small mall portion of the military is designed to fight. Most people who went to Nam never pulled a trigger because they served in support roles; mechanics, cooks, logistics, and so on. Many people who went to Nam never went into the jungle. 

 

As an Iraq vet I’ll say this is doubly true of Iraq. We called these people “pogs” or “fobbits.” They are disgusting creatures who will ALWAYS let you know they were deployed but they didn’t do fight club things while there. 

Posted

Here’s something that might surprise some people — I used to be liberal. Yup. Voted for Obama. I had a huge political shift as I studied history and realized I was supporting failed/harmful concepts and because the “Obama coalition” expects all white, straight, liberal men to act like cucks and just be ‘yes men.’ Liberals HATE white guys. It literally went like this:

 

Me (white bro): ‘Sure, I’ll vote for Obama!’

 

Me: ‘Yay, Obama won!’

 

Minority liberals: ‘you white men don’t get to decide ***** anymore. Sit down and do what we tell you or you’re a racist!’

 

 

 

Posted
17 hours ago, BigMcD said:

In honour of Trump, the school is being renamed Covfefe Catholic High School. 

 

You should stop posting here.    Your posts are sad and juvenile and bring nothing to the table.       Yes I’m factoring in your last 10 posts.        Maybe night school can help ?  

 

22 hours ago, Tiberius said:

It's funny, you don't even realize how bad you are losing. You really can't win. If Trump is prez, we are winning. If he gets removed, or when he loses the next election badly, we win. Sniff

 

Gonna apologize for being stupid again ? 

 

You’re never gonna get out of that laundromat if you keep getting fooled by fake news 

16 hours ago, Rob's House said:

I don't get it.

 

White people are bad.      Front page stuff. 

 

Right next to the tranny/Muslim bin ?

Posted
38 minutes ago, The_Dude said:

 

Minority liberals: ‘you white men don’t get to decide ***** anymore. Sit down and do what we tell you or you’re a racist!’

 

 

 

So to teach them a lesson you turned into the stereotype.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, GG said:

So to teach them a lesson you turned into the stereotype.  

 

If liberals are going to make everything about race (and they are) then I’ll proudly stand with my race. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, The_Dude said:

Dear Liberals,

 

The reason America is amazing is because of white men. This country would have never amounted to a damn thing without us, and it’s incapable of amounting to anything without us. 

 

Also, remember today, on MLK Day, that MLK was a worthless husband, and pastor. Martin never could keep his dick in his pants. He put his dick ahead of his religion, cause, and family on a routine basis. To me, that’s not a man worth celebrating. But he was a good orator. 

 

And lets be honest — most of the reasons minorities don’t like white bro’s is is because they’re jealous of our success. Sorry we’re so clever and awesome. 

You are claiming success for something you had absolutely nothing to do with. Sure, Whites happened to be lucky enough to get into circumstances that allowed them to be successful, thank goodness. But that has nothing to do with a dumb ass like you. You are along for the ride, you contributed nothing. Judging a person, an individual, by the color of their skin is so completely ignorant that it tangibly demonstrates your personal inferiority. 

Posted
Just now, Tiberius said:

You are claiming success for something you had absolutely nothing to do with. Sure, Whites happened to be lucky enough to get into circumstances that allowed them to be successful, thank goodness. But that has nothing to do with a dumb ass like you. You are along for the ride, you contributed nothing. Judging a person, an individual, by the color of their skin is so completely ignorant that it tangibly demonstrates your personal inferiority. 

 

I judge people based on their culture and the content of their character, not their skin color. 

 

By the way, "luck" had nothing to do with the success of western civilization. 

 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

You are claiming success for something you had absolutely nothing to do with. Sure, Whites happened to be lucky enough to get into circumstances that allowed them to be successful, thank goodness. But that has nothing to do with a dumb ass like you. You are along for the ride, you contributed nothing. Judging a person, an individual, by the color of their skin is so completely ignorant that it tangibly demonstrates your personal inferiority. 

okay, Obama.

Posted
1 minute ago, The_Dude said:

 

I judge people based on their culture and the content of their character, not their skin color. 

 

By the way, "luck" had nothing to do with the success of western civilization. 

 

Luck? Sure it did, they were geographically lucky to be in Western Europe. All the technological innovations were able to mesh there, even though many had been invented somewhere else. Better agriculture, less disease, better trade routes, etc. people are just people. 

3 minutes ago, Foxx said:

okay, Obama.

You don't agree with me?? Environment shapes the person as much or more than what they are born with, to a large degree. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Luck? Sure it did, they were geographically lucky to be in Western Europe. All the technological innovations were able to mesh there, even though many had been invented somewhere else. Better agriculture, less disease, better trade routes, etc. people are just people. 

You don't agree with me?? Environment shapes the person as much or more than what they are born with, to a large degree. 

  While new discoveries happened all across the globe far more happened in Western and Central Europe due to the university system largely promoted by the Catholic Church than elsewhere.  Proximity to NA helped the European succeed here but that same European was far better equipped to succeed than his non-Western European cousins.

Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Luck? Sure it did, they were geographically lucky to be in Western Europe. All the technological innovations were able to mesh there, even though many had been invented somewhere else. Better agriculture, less disease, better trade routes, etc. people are just people. 

You don't agree with me?? Environment shapes the person as much or more than what they are born with, to a large degree. 

 

1. You're an idiot

2. Better agriculture than Egypt?

3. Less disease? You idiot -- there was way more disease because of "trade routes" you meathead

4. Better trade routes were because of better goods. People didn't walk from China to Italy because it was convenient. God you're dumb. Don't play this game with me, I'm way better at it than you. Kinda what my degree is in.

 

You're an idiot. Your underlined point is the only thing correct in this. 

Edited by The_Dude
Posted
4 minutes ago, The_Dude said:

 

1. You're an idiot

2. Better agriculture than Egypt?

3. Less disease? You idiot -- there was way more disease because of "trade routes" you meathead

4. Better trade routes were because of better goods.

 

You're an idiot. Your underlined point is the only thing correct in this. 

  Tibs fails to see how far Egypt fell from the golden age during Biblical times in terms of agricultural production going into the Industrial Age.  It was innovations such as plant breeding that helped revitalize Egypt into modern times.  Population did grow in Egypt during modern times so even with innovations Egypt was still a net importer of products such as wheat.

×
×
  • Create New...