Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
9 hours ago, Gugny said:

 

I thought LimeAid made that statement.  Are you admitting to making multiple user accounts?

 

And if you hope any plane, with any human beings on it, crashes ..... well .... you're a special kind of sick.

 

I’m sure he meant it in the nicest possible way. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Johnny Hammersticks said:

 

I’m sure.  People always misinterpret my school bus colliding with a bus full of puppies quip.

 

Are you for it, or against it? Either way, it sounds fairly vague. What if there was one of those crazy squirrels trying to cross the road? Remember the STS Movement! (Save the squirrels for those who have been living under a rock.) 

Posted
1 minute ago, Augie said:

 

Are you for it, or against it? Either way, it sounds fairly vague. What if there was one of those crazy squirrels trying to cross the road? Remember the STS Movement! (Save the squirrels for those who have been living under a rock.) 

 

Did I mention that the school bus is full of blind midgets and drums of kerosene?

Posted
Just now, Johnny Hammersticks said:

 

Did I mention that the school bus is full of blind midgets and drums of kerosene?

 

Well NOW it’s starting to sound like a Fourth of July Spectacular! 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Augie said:

 

Well NOW it’s starting to sound like a Fourth of July Spectacular! 

 

I bet those little ***** can fly.

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted (edited)

My most controversial opinion was one I acted upon:  I voted for Donald Trump.  I felt, and still do, that the government in DC was  pretty much non-functional prior to 2016 (witness the candidacy of Hill'ry Clinton for President).  Nevertheless, I thought that there must be some good people in DC who just needed a smack up side the head to see that rigid partisanship was not productive, nor conducive to local, state nor national success in the 21st Century.

 

I saw Trump as an "interrupter" the proverbial smack up side the head, someone who was so far out of the norm, prone to making wild hair decisions, making nonsensical promises, etc. that reasoned people would come together and insure that such an occurrence would not happen again.

 

Silly me.  Enter the reawakening of Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer and the gaggle of newly minted Congress persons who can only see the way out of the current dilemma as following the well worn track deeper into the swamp.  Win election, beat the living crap out of the losers, insulate their structure against compromise, ignore those mere citizens of the USA who seek equality, fraternity and liberty by blindly creating structures that "build" voters for their party through modern homage to bread and circuses.  Making decisions  based on an  I-can-piss-farther-than-you-can foundation should have died out in fourth grade.

 

It's enough to make one vote for the Donald again!

 

Edited by Keukasmallies
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
40 minutes ago, Keukasmallies said:

My most controversial opinion was one I acted upon:  I voted for Donald Trump.  I felt, and still do, that the government in DC was  pretty much non-functional prior to 2016 (witness the candidacy of Hill'ry Clinton for President).  Nevertheless, I thought that there must be some good people in DC who just needed a smack up side the head to see that rigid partisanship was not productive, nor conducive to local, state nor national success in the 21st Century.

 

I saw Trump as an "interrupter" the proverbial smack up side the head, someone who was so far out of the norm, prone to making wild hair decisions, making nonsensical promises, etc. that reasoned people would come together and insure that such an occurrence would not happen again.

 

Silly me.  Enter the reawakening of Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer and the gaggle of newly minted Congress persons who can only see the way out of the current dilemma as following the well worn track deeper into the swamp.  Win election, beat the living crap out of the losers, insulate their structure against compromise, ignore those mere citizens of the USA who seek equality, fraternity and liberty by blindly creating structures that "build" voters for their party through modern homage to bread and circuses.  Making decisions  based on an  I-can-piss-farther-than-you-can foundation should have died out in fourth grade.

 

It's enough to make one vote for the Donald again!

 

Some times too much maintenance, over greasing, etc... Is actually worse than what the status quo was, under maintained.

 

Maybe a moto-head analogy: You can only bore the block so much before you throw a piston.

 

Guess what... We threw a piston.  Would have better to just leave the damn engine alone.

 

The traditional swamp now looks like the Sahara Desert to what's been created.  Be careful what You wish for.

Edited by ExiledInIllinois
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
19 minutes ago, ExiledInIllinois said:

Some times too much maintenance, over greasing, etc... Is actually worse than what the status quo was, under maintained.

 

Maybe a moto-head analogy: You can only bore the block so much before you throw a piston.

 

Guess what... We threw a piston.  Would have better to just leave the damn engine alone.

 

The traditional swamp now looks like the Sahara Desert to what's been created.  Be careful what You wish for.

 

I do understand this point of view, and went along with it for years.  I'm just of a mind that if you always do what you always did, you always get what you always got.  I'm convinced that in the 21st Century that's a recipe that leads to third rate status, and that's not good enough for me.  I'm actually looking forward to the coming of many more female legislators as they hold promise for different approches to old issues.

Edited by Keukasmallies
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Keukasmallies said:

My most controversial opinion was one I acted upon:  I voted for Donald Trump.  I felt, and still do, that the government in DC was  pretty much non-functional prior to 2016 (witness the candidacy of Hill'ry Clinton for President).  Nevertheless, I thought that there must be some good people in DC who just needed a smack up side the head to see that rigid partisanship was not productive, nor conducive to local, state nor national success in the 21st Century.

 

I saw Trump as an "interrupter" the proverbial smack up side the head, someone who was so far out of the norm, prone to making wild hair decisions, making nonsensical promises, etc. that reasoned people would come together and insure that such an occurrence would not happen again.

 

Silly me.  Enter the reawakening of Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer and the gaggle of newly minted Congress persons who can only see the way out of the current dilemma as following the well worn track deeper into the swamp.  Win election, beat the living crap out of the losers, insulate their structure against compromise, ignore those mere citizens of the USA who seek equality, fraternity and liberty by blindly creating structures that "build" voters for their party through modern homage to bread and circuses.  Making decisions  based on an  I-can-piss-farther-than-you-can foundation should have died out in fourth grade.

 

It's enough to make one vote for the Donald again!

 

Trump's not doing anything that's completely earth shattering or radical. It's the fact that the left was so blindsided by him winning the election that they are so bitter and hate him as a person that they can't come to grips and be reasonable with any type of discourse.  He could give every person $1 million dollars and they would complain it's not 2 million.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, RaoulDuke79 said:

Trump's not doing anything that's completely earth shattering or radical. It's the fact that the left was so blindsided by him winning the election that they are so bitter and hate him as a person that they can't come to grips and be reasonable with any type of discourse.  He could give every person $1 million dollars and they would complain it's not 2 million.

 

I wouldn’t complain at all if he gave me a million dollars.  In fact, I’d take him to KFC to share a bucket of extra crispy ?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
32 minutes ago, Keukasmallies said:

 

I do understand this point of view, and went along with it for years.  I'm just of a mind that if you always do what you always did, you always get what you always got.  I'm convinced that in the 21st Century that's a recipe that leads to third rate status, and that's not good enough for me.  I'm actually looking forward to the coming of many more female legislators as they hold promise for different approches to old issues.

I know... But Trump so immoral... Cloaked with him racing to the "Lock Her Up", "She is evil" bit... 

 

...It's usually the jealous, overbearing spouse that is committing the real deal, cheating... etc...

 

...We should have seen this a mile down the road. The real criminal usually points out who they think are the crooks, to take heat off them.

20 minutes ago, RaoulDuke79 said:

Trump's not doing anything that's completely earth shattering or radical. It's the fact that the left was so blindsided by him winning the election that they are so bitter and hate him as a person that they can't come to grips and be reasonable with any type of discourse.  He could give every person $1 million dollars and they would complain it's not 2 million.

Huh?  The minority is ruling and they are ramming their agenda down the majorities throat.

 

At least work from the middle.  Build a mandate.

17 minutes ago, Johnny Hammersticks said:

 

I wouldn’t complain at all if he gave me a million dollars.  In fact, I’d take him to KFC to share a bucket of extra crispy ?

Controversial topic:  I think Americans sell out way too much!

 

No less than 2 mill for me.

 

??

Posted
4 minutes ago, ExiledInIllinois said:

I know... But Trump so immoral... Cloaked with him racing to the "Lock Her Up", "She is evil" bit... 

 

...It's usually the jealous, overbearing spouse that is committing the real deal, cheating... etc...

 

...We should have seen this a mile down the road. The real criminal usually points out who they think are the crooks, to take heat off them.

Huh?  The minority is ruling and they are ramming their agenda down the majorities throat.

 

At least work from the middle.  Build a mandate.

There is no middle anymore. And what minority are you referring to?

Posted
1 minute ago, RaoulDuke79 said:

There is no middle anymore. And what minority are you referring to?

 

He’s speaking in tongues again.  Probably locked himself in the garage with the car running.  Put the phone down and open a window, exiled!!

Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, RaoulDuke79 said:

There is no middle anymore. And what minority are you referring to?

The shear amount of people that either agree with him or not.

 

More people (I know that's not what wins) disagree with him.  Yet, upside down elections are fine if you attempt to  not make irrelevant the majority of people.

 

He won, that's okay.  But he has to acknowledge the fact that it's upside down.  More people disagree with him.  He needs to accept that and try to establish a mandate with the people.

 

He's the Bills going into the 4th, 2020 with a 3 point lead against the Pats** and he's throwing bombs against the wind with a Tyrod Taylor arm.  No way it holds.

5 minutes ago, Johnny Hammersticks said:

 

He’s speaking in tongues again.  Probably locked himself in the garage with the car running.  Put the phone down and open a window, exiled!!

Trump still lost the popular vote.  Even know he won, that still means he has to work at it.

Edited by ExiledInIllinois
Posted
1 minute ago, ExiledInIllinois said:

Is it not on topic.  They are all controversial.  But anyway, sorry.  Will do.

So are a lot of posts with political stuff related to thread but I get flagged and post deleted while other ones do not.  When I report sometimes I get flagged as well by Trumpite so just posting in thread reminder.  Start most controversy opinion in politics on PPP if you want to continue discussion.

×
×
  • Create New...