Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
21 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

They only have 4 picks in the whole draft, and no 2nd rounder. So unless he falls to them at 27 overall in the 1st which is very unlikely i can’t see them moving up, unless they package next year’s 1st

 

Or Frank Clark.  

Posted
3 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

Yeah, gotta pay Russ

 

And Bobby Wagner who’s the Russell Wilson of their defense.  Makes so much sense for Seahawks to swap Clark for an edge rusher on a rookie deal.  

Posted
40 minutes ago, BuffaloRebound said:

Seahawks... very interesting.  

 

 

They pounced on a tumbling Malik McDowell..........another underachieving but impressive physical specimen DT(from a Michigan school!) with their top pick in 2017...........so they might have a "type".    Carroll definitely believes he can coach kid's up.

 

 

 

  

Posted
Just now, BuffaloRebound said:

 

And Bobby Wagner who’s the Russell Wilson of their defense.  Makes so much sense for Seahawks to swap Clark for an edge rusher on a rookie deal.  

Would you do it? 9 for 27 and Clark? Dan Morgan is our dir of player personnel and was part of the FO who drafted him. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

Would you do it? 9 for 27 and Clark? Dan Morgan is our dir of player personnel and was part of the FO who drafted him. 

 

Yes.  9 for 21 and Clark.  We have the cap space the next 3 years, and 21 is a better spot for WR/TE.  

Posted
2 minutes ago, BuffaloRebound said:

 

Yes.  9 for 21 and Clark.  We have the cap space the next 3 years, and 21 is a better spot for WR/TE.  

Oops yes I meant 21. Yup we could get our edge guy and WR in 1st that way and then TE or DT at top of 2nd. 

Posted
16 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

Would you do it? 9 for 27 and Clark? Dan Morgan is our dir of player personnel and was part of the FO who drafted him. 

Yep and Yep

 

Clarke is a stud....and 27 puts you in a position to get another impact player (Wilkins?)

Posted
1 minute ago, John from Riverside said:

Yep and Yep

 

Clarke is a stud....and 27 puts you in a position to get another impact player (Wilkins?)

Typo, they actually draft at 21 which is even better 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

Would still take WIlkins there if he drops.....

 

Then trade up for a offensive weapon?

They have a huge hole at 3 tech so I would do that too

Posted

I'm ok with just about anything other than Db, Oline or Rb at 9.  Those are the positions lacking an elite option.  I dont really want them to go "safe".  I would rather they go for the most talented guy.  Oliver, Gary, Metcalf, or Sweat.

Posted
6 hours ago, YoloinOhio said:

Would you do it? 9 for 27 and Clark? Dan Morgan is our dir of player personnel and was part of the FO who drafted him. 

No way!! He'd be looking for D. Lawrence money

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

This is exactly what we need...disruptors. I do not see it with this current Bills group. They are not scaring anyone...marginal... We need an infusion of defensive players that get it done...go after people.

×
×
  • Create New...