Ray Finkel Posted January 12, 2019 Posted January 12, 2019 32 minutes ago, BillyWhiteShows said: But doesn’t the fact that McVay was willing to move on from Sammy after 1 season speak volumes as well? I think that LA felt the same way a lot of Bills fan do, he’s just not good enough to get the money he wants. I have no animosity toward him. I just don’t think he was anywhere near as good as his hype, and even when he was healthy he never seemed to step up and take over games the way that a #1 WR usually does. Robert Woods is the better receiver.
HappyDays Posted January 12, 2019 Posted January 12, 2019 44 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said: Sammy averaged 16 more yards per game and that includes the Rams game where he played one drive. The 5 year NFL veteran averaged 16 more yards per game while playing in the best passing offense in the league, than the rookie UDFA off the practice squad who played in a poor passing offense. That's great for Sammy. 1
thebandit27 Posted January 12, 2019 Posted January 12, 2019 Just now, Ray Finkel said: Robert Woods is the better receiver. The open market says otherwise 1
C.Biscuit97 Posted January 12, 2019 Posted January 12, 2019 5 minutes ago, RobbRiddick said: I think it would come down to cost. I'm not sure what Watkins' contract numbers are for the Chiefs, but Foster is obviously incredibly affordable right now. Watkins is one of those guys with lots of potential, and every year you think this will be the one where he might show that potential to the full, but he hasn't done it yet. When you consider the underachieving, over pay, injuries and some of the bad attitude he had when he was in Buffalo I think I probably would just go with Foster at this point. There's something to be said for the way Foster has had to work so hard for what he's a achieved so far, especially the balls he showed after being cut and coming back. I agree with majority of your post. I think on a good offense, Foster is a 3 or 4. Still don’t fully trust him. But point taken. I still think Sammy has number 1 potential if his body could hold up.
Saxum Posted January 12, 2019 Author Posted January 12, 2019 Sammy should ask Oscar Pistorius for name of his doctor. 1
C.Biscuit97 Posted January 12, 2019 Posted January 12, 2019 2 minutes ago, Ray Finkel said: Robert Woods is the better receiver. https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/W/WoodRo02.htm https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/W/WatkSa00.htm sammy has 900 less yards and 5 tds in 23 fewer games.
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted January 12, 2019 Posted January 12, 2019 9 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said: Foot injuries have destroyed a lot of great athletes careers. .....yup....and probably the LAST body part you'd expect to derail a career....go figure................ 1 minute ago, Limeaid said: Sammy should ask Oscar Pistorius for name of his doctor. ..pretty sure it's Dr Ruth......
C.Biscuit97 Posted January 12, 2019 Posted January 12, 2019 4 minutes ago, HappyDays said: The 5 year NFL veteran averaged 16 more yards per game while playing in the best passing offense in the league, than the rookie UDFA off the practice squad who played in a poor passing offense. That's great for Sammy. Foster, the guy we cut? The guy we had to play because of our garbage trades for KB and Zay? sorry guys. I’m going with McVay and Reid’s opinions. Just like I went with Belichick’s opinion on “crappy” Gilmore. 2 minutes ago, iinii said: It is the little jobs thing, isn’t it? Which the losers who talk crap to athletes on social media deserve. They probably are losers with crappy jobs.
Magox Posted January 12, 2019 Posted January 12, 2019 52 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said: So healthy Sammy vs. Foster. You’re picking Foster? Would I rather have Sammy who is inconsistent and often-injured at a cost of $17 million year or an explosive improving rookie going into his second year Foster at less than $500,000 a year? It's not even debatable, Foster all day long. 5
Boatdrinks Posted January 12, 2019 Posted January 12, 2019 Cool story, but wtf cares ? Don’t understand the obsession with a player the Bills traded. 2
C.Biscuit97 Posted January 12, 2019 Posted January 12, 2019 1 minute ago, Magox said: Would I rather have Sammy who is inconsistent and often-injured at a cost of $17 million year or an explosive improving rookie going into his second year Foster at less than $500,000 a year? It's not even debatable, Foster all day long. And this is why our offense has sucked for two years! You work for the Bills? 1
Magox Posted January 12, 2019 Posted January 12, 2019 9 minutes ago, thebandit27 said: The open market says otherwise The open market also made Haynesworth the highest played defender in the league at one point. The open market often gets it wrong. Woods has been the more consistent and productive receiver and my guess is that trend will continue. 1 minute ago, C.Biscuit97 said: And this is why our offense has sucked for two years! You work for the Bills? Says the guy pining for the days of Whaley and Watkins 3
C.Biscuit97 Posted January 12, 2019 Posted January 12, 2019 1 minute ago, Magox said: The open market also made Haynesworth the highest played defender in the league at one point. The open market often gets it wrong. Woods has been the more consistent and productive receiver and my guess is that trend will continue. Says the guy pining for the days of Whaley and Watkins You might want to review the team rankings under Whaley vs the current team. That 2014 team would have curb stomped the 2017 team. 1
thebandit27 Posted January 12, 2019 Posted January 12, 2019 9 minutes ago, Magox said: The open market also made Haynesworth the highest played defender in the league at one point. The open market often gets it wrong. Woods has been the more consistent and productive receiver and my guess is that trend will continue. Says the guy pining for the days of Whaley and Watkins Consistent yes; we've certainly seen that Watkins' best is WR1-worthy though, which is why he got WR1 money. I guess the big difference is that when DCs sit down to game plan, they most likely aren't keying on Woods as a guy they need a specific plan to stop. Watkins has definitely been that guy at points in his career 1
HappyDays Posted January 12, 2019 Posted January 12, 2019 11 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said: Foster, the guy we cut? The guy we had to play because of our garbage trades for KB and Zay? Yep, exactly. That's the receiver you are using to prop up Sammy Watkins. Is that supposed to make him look good? 12 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said: sorry guys. I’m going with McVay Me too. McVay let Sammy go a year after trading a 2nd for him, and used a 1st to trade for a different receiver and gave him a similar contract. Reid made the same mistake. No one is saying Sammy is complete garbage, or that he wouldn't upgrade our offense. He is a pretty good receiver but he is wildly overrated, and he has trouble staying on the field. In the past 2 seasons teams have given up a 1st, a 2nd, and $17 million for his 556 yards per season. He only has 139 more yards than Kelvin Benjamin this season. That's embarrassing. And yeah it's because of injures not talent, but that's his history. He's pretty good on the field and injury prone. 3
Bill_with_it Posted January 12, 2019 Posted January 12, 2019 17 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said: And this is why our offense has sucked for two years! You work for the Bills? Sammy’s productionnor his hyped up potential is worth no where near what he’s being paid. If you can’t see his lack of consistent, reliable, availability problems, you might wanna a pick a new sport to spectate. 1
teef Posted January 12, 2019 Posted January 12, 2019 Zay Jones has better production than Sammy Watkins this year. I’m not saying he’s a better receiver, but Sammy is busy being Sammy. 1
Helpmenow Posted January 12, 2019 Posted January 12, 2019 38 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said: Foot injuries have destroyed a lot of great athletes careers. Besides Walton who else
Chicken Boo Posted January 12, 2019 Posted January 12, 2019 If Sammy goes off today, this thread is going to get real interesting.
Recommended Posts