Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
9 minutes ago, RalphWilson'sNewWar said:

Intersting.

 

Beane puts 6-10 on him and part of the plan.  Then three coaches get fired.

 

Guess Terry isn’t as patient.

 

Or they aren't very good and they want to upgrade.

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted

Another one where I could care less. It's the players not the coach. Look around the league. Special teams coaches have great and awful units in their careers. But a change in coach is fine but won't make a differnce if they do not upgrade the backup WR, LB, and DB spots that make up the bulk of the coverage units.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, RalphWilson'sNewWar said:

Intersting.

 

Beane puts 6-10 on him and part of the plan.  Then three coaches get fired.

 

Guess Terry isn’t as patient.

 

If your point is that firing assistant coaches admits mistakes and takes heat off the GM and the coach by placing blame elsewhere, I agree. 

 

I do think its a little optimistic to think that every staff hire is going to be brilliant and every player personnel move is going to work out swimmingly.  It's not really the way it works.  Even Belichick makes mistakes in assistant coach hiring and player moves.   One of the emerging strengths of the current regime is admitting errors and cutting bait (Benjamin, etc.).  I think Terry and Kim have created the environment that allows this as long as they see progress toward the vision.

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 2
Posted
6 minutes ago, CommonCents said:

So far every move that has been made appeals to the majority of TBD. OBD has finally accepted that TBD is superior. 

 

Now cut Murphy, Shady, and Clay. 

 

Yea specially Jon Murphy he sucks, lol

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Misterbluesky said:

I hope the next guy is given better talent to work worth...it's all about having solid depth and,of course,a talented return man..or two.jmho

 

 

Agreed. Bad special teams is generally indicative of an incomplete roster/lack of depth. There is a difference between under performing players and bad players. We have bad depth at CB, LB, WR. Doesn't give your ST much of a chance. 

 

That said, Crossman still blows. 

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
11 minutes ago, RalphWilson'sNewWar said:

Intersting.

 

Beane puts 6-10 on him and part of the plan.  Then three coaches get fired.

 

Guess Terry isn’t as patient.

 

You're consistent in your disdain for Beane and McDermott, almost to the point of weirdness. What is it you're trying to communicate here?

 

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Ethan in Portland said:

Another one where I could care less. It's the players not the coach. Look around the league. Special teams coaches have great and awful units in their careers. But a change in coach is fine but won't make a differnce if they do not upgrade the backup WR, LB, and DB spots that make up the bulk of the coverage units.

 

I generally agree with this.   The GMs and HCs who prioritize STs stock them with good players who then produce good results.

 

But not all ST coaches are created equal.   I think McD can upgrade Crossman.

  • SDS changed the title to Bills fire ST Coach Danny Crossman
  • SDS pinned this topic
Posted

I wonder too if Crossman failed to adjust to the new kickoff rules implemented this year. Have to bring in someone who knows how to work around the new rules.

Posted

Not that I'm any fan of Crossman, but he's not the one who decided to keep Hauschka on the roster (instead of placing him on IR) instead of replacing him with a kicker who could reach the crossbar on 40 yard FG tries and get kickoffs past the 15 yard line ....

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...