Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, BillsRdue said:

I'd like to see AJ in Bills blue.  Colts, Cowboys, Texans, Seahawks in excellent shape for sustained success. Browns, Bills, Jets ready to take the next steps to relevance again.

 

Not sure about the cowboys.. They have some monster contracts to hand out the next season or 2. 

Posted (edited)

Are those numbers correct for Bengals?

 

That page looks like it has as a few issues.

 

I had a look yesterday and it said they were $50Mil under the cap...hence why I think Green is a bit of a pipe dream

Edited by Aussie Joe
Posted
Just now, Aussie Joe said:

Are those numbers correct for Bengals?

 

That page looks like it has as a few issues.

 

I had a look yesterday and it said they were $50Mil under the cap...

 

It's wrong.  If you open the bengals page for 2019 and scroll down you will see every player is listed 3 times after the first dozen or so.

It happens on their site sometimes.  It will be fixed tomorrow.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, ColoradoBills said:

 

LOL.  I hope you guys know that is a glitch.  Bengals got 147 signed players in 2019.

Lol... makes sense now . Seemed pretty high!

Posted
5 minutes ago, Chicharito said:

Lol... makes sense now . Seemed pretty high!

 

I'm on Spotrac a lot and one time I logged on and that glitch was with the Bills.

I freaked out!!!!!!!

Posted
44 minutes ago, ColoradoBills said:

 

LOL.  I hope you guys know that is a glitch.  Bengals got 147 signed players in 2019.

 

147 players and they still couldn't make the playoffs!!  Lewis was worse than we thought!

  • Haha (+1) 3
Posted

So basically us along with almost all other teams have a crapload of cap space.

 

Indy is in the playoffs this year and will have $122 million?? Are you serious? They are poised to be really really good for a long time.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, matter2003 said:

So basically us along with almost all other teams have a crapload of cap space.

 

Indy is in the playoffs this year and will have $122 million?? Are you serious? They are poised to be really really good for a long time.

 

The Jets have set them up massively last year when they traded up for Darnold..

 

The Colts still ended up with the player they wanted ( Nelson)  in the first round and they extorted another three second rounders out of them..

Posted
31 minutes ago, Aussie Joe said:

 

The Jets have set them up massively last year when they traded up for Darnold..

 

The Colts still ended up with the player they wanted ( Nelson)  in the first round and they extorted another three second rounders out of them..

Please pass that plan on to McBeane.  The Bills roster is full of so many holes, there is little chance FA and three picks in the first three rounds is going to be enough.

Posted
33 minutes ago, Aussie Joe said:

 

The Jets have set them up massively last year when they traded up for Darnold..

 

The Colts still ended up with the player they wanted ( Nelson)  in the first round and they extorted another three second rounders out of them..

 

And they drafted the Defensive Rookie if the Year in the 2nd.

Posted
46 minutes ago, Aussie Joe said:

 

The Jets have set them up massively last year when they traded up for Darnold..

 

The Colts still ended up with the player they wanted ( Nelson)  in the first round and they extorted another three second rounders out of them..

 

This is also why it's important to lose those end of season meaningless games to get a better draft pick.  Sure, people say you can get a good player anywhere, but the higher you pick, the more options you have, including trade down scenarios.  If the Colts had won another meaningless game or two at the end of the year, they lose out on Nelson and 3 seconds.  At 9 we won't get any offers like that, but maybe we can grab an additional second to move down a few spots if someone enticing fell to 9.

Posted
12 minutes ago, essential said:

 

This is also why it's important to lose those end of season meaningless games to get a better draft pick.  Sure, people say you can get a good player anywhere, but the higher you pick, the more options you have, including trade down scenarios.  If the Colts had won another meaningless game or two at the end of the year, they lose out on Nelson and 3 seconds.  At 9 we won't get any offers like that, but maybe we can grab an additional second to move down a few spots if someone enticing fell to 9.

 

Check! One down for tanking! 

 

I don’t advocate tanking, but it helps take the sting out of a loss late in the year. Still, I’m encouraged that they looked good and can go into the offseason on a high note. (But not the Josh Gordon kind....) 

Posted
1 hour ago, matter2003 said:

So basically us along with almost all other teams have a crapload of cap space.

 

Indy is in the playoffs this year and will have $122 million?? Are you serious? They are poised to be really really good for a long time.

 

Yeah, that's eye popping.  Plus the draft picks from last year's trade.  Yikes.

Posted
6 hours ago, matter2003 said:

So basically us along with almost all other teams have a crapload of cap space.

 

Indy is in the playoffs this year and will have $122 million?? Are you serious? They are poised to be really really good for a long time.

 

Yea. Really, really good GM. And critically he had money last year but did't spend loads of it. Judicious was probably his watch word too. 

×
×
  • Create New...