Clemfield2622 Posted December 17, 2018 Posted December 17, 2018 Just now, NoHuddleKelly12 said: I don’t care about draft position right now. I do care about establishing a winning culture, JA’s confidence (and by extension, that of his young wideouts), and momentum to flash for potential established FA’s so maybe the overpayments aren’t as bad. For the draft, it’s a highly speculative science even in the best of slots (just ask the Brownies over the past decade until finally hitting the lotto this year) and I have a feeling we won’t stay pat wherever we end up regardless. Too many unknowns right now to worry about. Just win baby!! Sorry, don't buy it. Never have. Remember when the Bills were 0-8 and had the inside track to the #1 pick in possibly the best draft in NFL history? They brought Fitz in, went 4-4 and ended up picking Dareus, who was about the only non QB bust in the top 11 that year. Did those 4 big wins carry over to the next year, or did it just stop them from drafting their franchise QB for 7 more years?
jimmy10 Posted December 17, 2018 Posted December 17, 2018 1 hour ago, PaattMaann said: winning/playing well is more important than a few draft spots. Sorry but it is. Lets keep the JA train rolling. Exactly. The negative nancy bean-counting around record and draft position is tiresome. 1
SCBills Posted December 17, 2018 Posted December 17, 2018 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Clemfield2622 said: Sorry, don't buy it. Never have. Remember when the Bills were 0-8 and had the inside track to the #1 pick in possibly the best draft in NFL history? They brought Fitz in, went 4-4 and ended up picking Dareus, who was about the only non QB bust in the top 11 that year. Did those 4 big wins carry over to the next year, or did it just stop them from drafting their franchise QB for 7 more years? We have a completely different staff evaluating talent and we have our franchise QB. I highly doubt McBeane will be out here drafting any Marcell's. They might draft another Zay somewhere, but even he isn't useless with no work ethic. Edited December 17, 2018 by SCBills
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted December 17, 2018 Posted December 17, 2018 2 minutes ago, Clemfield2622 said: Sorry, don't buy it. Never have. Remember when the Bills were 0-8 and had the inside track to the #1 pick in possibly the best draft in NFL history? They brought Fitz in, went 4-4 and ended up picking Dareus, who was about the only non QB bust in the top 11 that year. Did those 4 big wins carry over to the next year, or did it just stop them from drafting their franchise QB for 7 more years? We've drafted our QB. So that's kind of a moot point. 1
NoHuddleKelly12 Posted December 17, 2018 Posted December 17, 2018 Just now, Clemfield2622 said: Sorry, don't buy it. Never have. Remember when the Bills were 0-8 and had the inside track to the #1 pick in possibly the best draft in NFL history? They brought Fitz in, went 4-4 and ended up picking Dareus, who was about the only non QB bust in the top 11 that year. Did those 4 big wins carry over to the next year, or did it just stop them from drafting their franchise QB for 7 more years? It’s a little different when you are developing what is hopefully already your franchise bedrock QB for the next 10+ years, that you just selected #7 overall in 1st round, no? 1
Clemfield2622 Posted December 17, 2018 Posted December 17, 2018 1 minute ago, Joe in Winslow said: And which QB is going to have teams giving up that kind of bounty? and Qhich teams are going to be looking for a QB? Because REALLY that's where the big "trade-down" bounties are manufactured, as you said. Have you ever looked at mock drafts even this time of year against what ends up happening? There are guys being projected as 1st rounders today that might end up going in the 5th round in 6 months, and vice versa. For the record, McShay does have 2 QB's going in his top 10. But as of now, 7 of the teams picking in the top 10 have either young QB's or QB's making a butt ton of money. Jax, Tampa and NYG would likely be looking QB. Those teams could be willing to pay to move up to secure a QB knowing a team looking for a defender would take the extra assets while pushing D prospects down the board.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted December 17, 2018 Posted December 17, 2018 1 minute ago, Clemfield2622 said: Have you ever looked at mock drafts even this time of year against what ends up happening? There are guys being projected as 1st rounders today that might end up going in the 5th round in 6 months, and vice versa. For the record, McShay does have 2 QB's going in his top 10. But as of now, 7 of the teams picking in the top 10 have either young QB's or QB's making a butt ton of money. Jax, Tampa and NYG would likely be looking QB. Those teams could be willing to pay to move up to secure a QB knowing a team looking for a defender would take the extra assets while pushing D prospects down the board. I generally don't start looking at mock drafts until after the college bowls and the super bowl.
SCBills Posted December 17, 2018 Posted December 17, 2018 (edited) Lets say we win one or both of our remaining games and end up drafting around 15.. Worst case draft scenario. 1st Round - Prime position for an elite OL or WR talent. 2nd Round - Prime position for a very good G/C or WR talent. 3rd Round - Prime position for a legit RB If we come out of the first 3 rounds with an OL, WR and RB to go with the assumed FA signings of an OL (or 2) and a WR or TE, what are we stressing about? We've got our QB. We've got a good defense for next year. Between FA & the Draft, we can most likely add 2-3 OL upgrades, 2 pass catching upgrades and a RB upgrade to go with Josh Allen, Shady, Foster, McKenzie, Zay, Croom, Clay, Dawkins and Teller. Our defense will need to be addressed in the following offseason re: pass rusher, but with Hughes, Lawson, Star, Phillips, Edmunds, Milano, White, Johnson, Hyde & Poyer, there's plenty of talent for McDermott and Frazier to work with in 2019. Edited December 17, 2018 by SCBills 3
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted December 17, 2018 Posted December 17, 2018 Just now, SCBills said: Lets say we win one or both of our remaining games and end up drafting around 15.. Worst case draft scenario. 1st Round - Prime position for an elite OL or WR talent. 2nd Round - Prime position for a very good G/C or WR talent. 3rd Round - Prime position for a legit RB If we come out of the first 3 rounds with an OL, WR and RB to go with the assumed FA signings of an OL (or 2) and a WR or TE, what are we stressing about? We've got our QB. We've got a good defense for next year. We can most likely add 2-3 OL upgrades, 2 pass catching upgrades and a RB upgrade to go with Josh Allen, Shady, Foster, McKenzie, Zay, Croom, Clay, Dawkins and Teller. Our defense will need to be addressed in the following offseason re: pass rusher, but with Hughes, Lawson, Edmunds, Milano, White, Johnson, Hyde & Poyer, there's plenty of talent for McDermott and Frazier to work with in 2019. Dude, you get it. Great post. 1
Big Turk Posted December 17, 2018 Author Posted December 17, 2018 1 hour ago, T master said: It would be nice but i don't see them winning either of their last 2 games ? The Pats are pissed & have had our number for years & the Fins are playing really good or at least it seems that way . I hope they prove me wrong but it wouldn't hurt my feelings seeing as the rest of this season is to see what we have on the roster as keepers a top 5 draft pick would be a nice consolation prize to get our starting LT of the future !! Fins just got demolished by Minnesota and allowed 40+ points
Clemfield2622 Posted December 17, 2018 Posted December 17, 2018 because you can never have too many good young cheap players. to assume the Bills are going to get a good OL, WR or TE in free agency at this point is wishful thinking. They are not the only team with cap room. Jets, Browns, Colts, Dallas, Raiders, Cards, Texans, Seahawks, Niners, Bengals all have over 50m in cap room. There is going to be a lot of competition for the players who do get to market. That's likely going to cause most of these players to get paid more than they're worth. That's why drafted players are preferable, because of cost control.
1st Ammendment NoMas Posted December 17, 2018 Posted December 17, 2018 1 hour ago, Clemfield2622 said: No, it's not. Don't get me wrong, while I am excited to see Allen develop, the draft position never stops being important. 3 days after the season ends, you will not remember these useless victories, but you will then immediately wish we picked higher. Tell that to the guys in the locker room. McD's post game speech and the energy in the locker room is contagious after a win, especially at home. That carries into the off-season. When a team finds a way to "win" it becomes part of the culture. You go into Foxborough and take out the Pats next week and you don't think that affects the core of this team moving forward. I will take that win over drafting 3 places higher any day of the week. Good teams find good players everywhere in the draft. Did 3 positions net Robert Foster? WIN! WIN!! WIN!!! at all costs. 10 minutes ago, SCBills said: Between FA & the Draft, we can most likely add 2-3 OL upgrades, 2 pass catching upgrades and a RB upgrade to go with Josh Allen, Shady, Foster, McKenzie, Zay, Croom, Clay, Dawkins and Teller. Fixed.
Success Posted December 17, 2018 Posted December 17, 2018 I can’t relate to preferring a slightly higher draft pick over beating the Pats at Gillette and likely wrecking a bye week and any hope they’d have in the playoffs. 1
SCBills Posted December 17, 2018 Posted December 17, 2018 (edited) 13 minutes ago, BillsRdue said: Tell that to the guys in the locker room. McD's post game speech and the energy in the locker room is contagious after a win, especially at home. That carries into the off-season. When a team finds a way to "win" it becomes part of the culture. You go into Foxborough and take out the Pats next week and you don't think that affects the core of this team moving forward. I will take that win over drafting 3 places higher any day of the week. Good teams find good players everywhere in the draft. Did 3 positions net Robert Foster? WIN! WIN!! WIN!!! at all costs. Fixed. I'd have no problem cutting them but I don't think we will. Clay is a wash financially and I think they A) Hope Shady still has another year left in him behind a better OL and B) like the vet leadership he provides for the offensive side of the ball. Edited December 17, 2018 by SCBills
GunnerBill Posted December 17, 2018 Posted December 17, 2018 23 minutes ago, SCBills said: Our defense will need to be addressed in the following offseason re: pass rusher, but with Hughes, Lawson, Star, Phillips, Edmunds, Milano, White, Johnson, Hyde & Poyer, there's plenty of talent for McDermott and Frazier to work with in 2019. I agree except I don't think we can wait again on pass rusher. Our only two credible pass rushers are 36 and 31 by the time next season starts. To be banking on them repeating the excellent seasons they are having this year would be an extremely foolhardy move in my mind. You have seen what the defense looks like the games when we have struggled to get pressure. We need to take a pass rusher somewhere in the first three rounds. If that means a running back or a guard has to wait then so be it. 1
Clemfield2622 Posted December 17, 2018 Posted December 17, 2018 (edited) 4 minutes ago, SCBills said: I'd have no problem cutting them but I don't think we will. Clay is a wash financially and I think they A) Hope Shady still has another year left in him behind a better OL and B) like the vet leadership he provides for the offensive side of the ball. Clay is not a wash financially. he saves 4.5mil. Even on a team with a ton of cap room, does it makes sense to carry 2 veterans who have been minimal contributors who next year would cost 18 million? or you could cut them both and add another 10.5 mil to the pile. I think it's worth it to move on from both. Remember, cap space rolls over. So savings are savings. It is not use it or lose it. Edited December 17, 2018 by Clemfield2622 1
SCBills Posted December 17, 2018 Posted December 17, 2018 4 minutes ago, Clemfield2622 said: Clay is not a wash financially. he saves 4.5mil. Even on a team with a ton of cap room, does it makes sense to carry 2 veterans who have been minimal contributors who next year would cost 18 million? or you could cut them both and add another 10.5 mil to the pile. I think it's worth it to move on from both. Remember, cap space rolls over. So savings are savings. It is not use it or lose it. We'd still have to use that money to sign another TE. I'd happily be proven wrong by them cutting Clay. Shady I'm on the fence about, but it can't be discounted that Murphy/Ford gave us the same production as Shady/Ivory yesterday.
bigK14094 Posted December 17, 2018 Posted December 17, 2018 The difference between #10 and #12 pick in the first round cannot be quantified really. The uncertainty in performance of any particular draftee way exceeds the difference in talent in those close draft choices. So, don't worry. 8, 10, 12...macht nichs.....
Mark80 Posted December 17, 2018 Posted December 17, 2018 (edited) Really? Are there actually people in here arguing that is better to draft lower in the draft (mid teens compared to top 10)? Seriously? You realize you can select the same person in the top 10 that you can select in the mid teens or 20's, right? Or, you could even trade down to those spots and get more picks. Imagine that. Teams are ALWAYS looking to trade up to make sure they get the guy they want the most. It's just a matter of how much they are willing to give up to do so. Sure, for a blue chip QB they may be willing to give up multiple firsts and/or seconds. Maybe they won't for a DB they want, but they may be willing to give up a third to jump up a few slots and that is still worth something to us. Edited December 17, 2018 by Mark80
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted December 17, 2018 Posted December 17, 2018 Just now, bigK14094 said: ..macht nichs..... I haven't heard that since I lived in PA Dutch country. Though they say it more like mawx nix.
Recommended Posts