Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
19 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

So, anyone not straight is a freak?  Is that what you're saying deek?

Nice try Billsy

You've now been called out. Deal with it hypocrite! We see your hate, and it isn’t appealing in the slightest. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted

Wow Billsy, you must watch a lot of CNN. Never said anything of the sort. In fact , the word “ gay” isn’t mentioned in the bill or by myself. Only a dunce could make that leap. I’ll bet you thought Trump told you to drink bleach. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said:

Wow Billsy, you must watch a lot of CNN. Never said anything of the sort. In fact , the word “ gay” isn’t mentioned in the bill or by myself. Only a dunce could make that leap. I’ll bet you thought Trump told you to drink bleach. 


Yup. Only dolts consider reading 280 character emotional blasts from other Twit For Brains as the truth and critical thinking. 

Posted

 

 

So what exactly is the “hateful legislation” that “target[s] vulnerable students”?

 

The Democrats never actually say. They just call it the “Don’t say gay” bill.

 

It doesn’t make any sense, but it rhymes, which is good enough for them.

 

 

 

This is the provision they are talking about in its entirety:

Classroom instruction by school personnel or third parties on sexual orientation or gender identity may not occur in kindergarten through grade 3 or in a manner that is not age-appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students in accordance with state standards.

 

 

It is hard to see why that should be controversial. Most people would struggle to understand why teachers should be instructing second graders on “gender identity.”

 

 

 

https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2022/1557/BillText/er/PDF

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, B-Man said:

 

 

So what exactly is the “hateful legislation” that “target[s] vulnerable students”?

 

The Democrats never actually say. They just call it the “Don’t say gay” bill.

 

It doesn’t make any sense, but it rhymes, which is good enough for them.

 

 

 

This is the provision they are talking about in its entirety:

Classroom instruction by school personnel or third parties on sexual orientation or gender identity may not occur in kindergarten through grade 3 or in a manner that is not age-appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students in accordance with state standards.

 

 

It is hard to see why that should be controversial. Most people would struggle to understand why teachers should be instructing second graders on “gender identity.”

 

 

 

https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2022/1557/BillText/er/PDF


It’s not controversial and the funny part th

Billy Boy says that supporting this will damage the right when, in my mind, this is going to damage the left in a big way.  They can’t  (at least Billy Boy can’t) even articulate what so so bad about this Bill. Keep screaming for this *****.  Keep supporting teaching these things to children. 
 

Here is the $64,000,000 question.  What are they looking to accomplish by teaching these things?  I would love to know. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
53 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

So what exactly is the “hateful legislation” that “target[s] vulnerable students”?

 

The Democrats never actually say. They just call it the “Don’t say gay” bill.

 

It doesn’t make any sense, but it rhymes, which is good enough for them.

 

 

 

This is the provision they are talking about in its entirety:

Classroom instruction by school personnel or third parties on sexual orientation or gender identity may not occur in kindergarten through grade 3 or in a manner that is not age-appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students in accordance with state standards.

 

 

It is hard to see why that should be controversial. Most people would struggle to understand why teachers should be instructing second graders on “gender identity.”

 

 

 

https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2022/1557/BillText/er/PDF

Exactly. But libs hate the traditional family structure , White males etc etc. They know they must infiltrate young minds to reach them and offset what they’re being taught at home. The earlier the better to these individuals. It reminds me of a news clip I saw at the start of the pandemic. They were talking to a teacher whose school just went remote. His biggest fear was parents getting involved when they saw what he was teaching kids in class. 

Edited by Boatdrinks
Posted
13 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:


It’s not controversial and the funny part th

Billy Boy says that supporting this will damage the right when, in my mind, this is going to damage the left in a big way.  They can’t  (at least Billy Boy can’t) even articulate what so so bad about this Bill. Keep screaming for this *****.  Keep supporting teaching these things to children. 
 

Here is the $64,000,000 question.  What are they looking to accomplish by teaching these things?  I would love to know. 

 

Did you miss my lengthy post on why this bill is wrong?

 

Posted
13 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:


It’s not controversial and the funny part th

Billy Boy says that supporting this will damage the right when, in my mind, this is going to damage the left in a big way.  They can’t  (at least Billy Boy can’t) even articulate what so so bad about this Bill. Keep screaming for this *****.  Keep supporting teaching these things to children. 
 

Here is the $64,000,000 question.  What are they looking to accomplish by teaching these things?  I would love to know. 

 

This issue will be just like virtual school and mask mandates. Most parents, left or right, are not on board with any of this.

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

This issue will be just like virtual school and mask mandates. Most parents, left or right, are not on board with any of this.


And if there is any good to come from this pandemic one thing is parents actually witnessing what their children are being told not taught. 

44 minutes ago, BuffaninSarasota said:

either provide proof I said it or retract your statement. I don't have time for your juvenile nonsense.


Good luck. 🙄

  • Agree 1
Posted
30 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

So what exactly is the “hateful legislation” that “target[s] vulnerable students”?

 

The Democrats never actually say. They just call it the “Don’t say gay” bill.

 

It doesn’t make any sense, but it rhymes, which is good enough for them.

 

 

 

This is the provision they are talking about in its entirety:

Classroom instruction by school personnel or third parties on sexual orientation or gender identity may not occur in kindergarten through grade 3 or in a manner that is not age-appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students in accordance with state standards.

 

 

It is hard to see why that should be controversial. Most people would struggle to understand why teachers should be instructing second graders on “gender identity.”

 

 

 

https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2022/1557/BillText/er/PDF

 

Nothing like cherry picking select parts of the bill Bonnie!  You win.

 

 

 

Posted

The sheer amount of sexual abuse perpetrated by so-called "educators" in schools in this country provides ample justification for ANY talk regarding sexuality between minors and school employees to be banned.

 

The US Department of Education, in the mid-00's, estimated that 10% of all K-12 students will be sexually victimized by a school employee by the time they graduate high school. Do we think this number has gone up or down in the last ~15 years?

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, aristocrat said:

 

Are students prohibited from speaking about lgbtq in the classroom amongst themselves?

 

Oh, I have a question! Why is it considered an "LGBTQ right" to speak to kindergartners about sex?

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Chef Jim said:


And if there is any good to come from this pandemic one thing is parents actually witnessing what their children are being told not taught. 


Good luck. 🙄

Yep, it would be the decent thing to do but I’m not holding my breath 

Posted

Don't let BillSy off the hook.  He quickly went to calling everyone in support of this legislation a "freak". It should have showed you all how he really feels.  True diversity hatred on full display.  This thread should have ended right there! 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, aristocrat said:

 

Are students prohibited from speaking about lgbtq in the classroom amongst themselves?

 

Nothing is stopping kids from discussing  amongst themselves but if the teacher or administrator overhears the conversation - they are required to call the parents and tell them.

 

This bill is meant to bully and force kids to be ashamed of themselves...

 

Can anyone point to an education syllabus where classrooms in kindergarten, first, second and third grade are discussing sex education?

 

And what happens when a kid asks an innocent question as to why Kenneth has two Moms or Ann has two dads?  How do  teachers address that question in front of all kids without making the kid asking the question feel bad or alienating the kids in question?

 

 

 

Posted
5 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

Nothing is stopping kids from discussing  amongst themselves but if the teacher or administrator overhears the conversation - they are required to call the parents and tell them.

 

This bill is meant to bully and force kids to be ashamed of themselves...

 

Can anyone point to an education syllabus where classrooms in kindergarten, first, second and third grade are discussing sex education?

 

And what happens when a kid asks an innocent question as to why Kenneth has two Moms or Ann has two dads?  How do  teachers address that question in front of all kids without making the kid asking the question feel bad or alienating the kids in question?

 

 

 

Hey Freak.....are you a trained educator?  I think not...or at least I hope not. Please leave this to the professional educators.

Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

Nothing is stopping kids from discussing  amongst themselves but if the teacher or administrator overhears the conversation - they are required to call the parents and tell them.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Can you point to where that amendment is in this legislation please. I would greatly appreciate that. 

 

edit. I guess I'll just tell you that this is not part of the bill so nice try lying about this bill. 

Edited by aristocrat
×
×
  • Create New...