Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

 

10 hours ago, Warcodered said:

 

What exactly is banned because everything I've seen seems like it's really open ended. There is more to gay and trans than sex or at least you don't have to actually get into that. Pretty sure plenty of kids in those age groups are exposed to the concepts of romantic feeling/relationships(like mom and dad) I mean are teachers just not supposed to explain anything if kids ask them questions like why in an art project did a kid draw two moms or two dads? It's not like that's even hard to answer.

 

from what i read and its alot of longform law talk. its basically says you must notify parents of any mental or physical behavioral issues that are noticed in children. something one would think is standard and unnecessary. guess not because not only is it not standard but people..actively fight against it!?

 

the big one is teachers cannot enact a curriculum where sex or gender identity is taught in k through 3. a curriculum as in a topic or class taught. nothing to do with answering a child's questions in class or independently, they just cant construct a curriculum on it. i would think this would also be standard for a school to inform parents if a child is bringing up certain adult topics and a parent should be aware of that curiosity and handle it in the best way THEY see fit.

 

if there's anything that seems out of line or transphobic..its not in there as its been pointed out the "dont say gay" bill doesn't say anything about gay at all. media and leftists decided teachers should have the ability to. 

 

1) keep parents in the dark about any issues kids may have which can include something such as gender dysphoria as a example, thats not in the bill. so what about depression? what about showing signs of ADHD ect ect. if a teacher sees signs of a disorder what in the world makes people think this info should not be informed to the parent and that schools can unilaterally become aware or worse treat a condition without parental consent? 

 

2) parents should not be aware of specific topics being taught in class and k through 3 is a good time to teach kids adult topics in a age range they still believe fat men fly with reindeer and giant bunnies give them candy. again what exactly are people fighting against here besides a republican put it out so i need to fight against it.

 

 

Edited by Buffarukus
Posted
51 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

You mean groom?

 

Yes, you do.

 

 

Lol. Groom? You mean grooming men to marry women, which is, you know, the only way to keep populating the earth. If same sex was natural I would assume there’d be a way to populate the earth that way, but there’s not. There’s a NATURAL law whether you want to admit it or not.

  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, billsfan5121 said:

Lol. Groom? You mean grooming men to marry women, which is, you know, the only way to keep populating the earth. If same sex was natural I would assume there’d be a way to populate the earth that way, but there’s not. There’s a NATURAL law whether you want to admit it or not.

 

So, sexuality is a choice?

Posted
3 hours ago, BillStime said:

 

Yea, ok bro - you go bro - I hope you win bro and rally hard behind all that GQP manufactured HATE.

 

And lastly - you don't give a SHITTTE about kids:

 

image.thumb.jpeg.9dbb7112b0f2b5955b872c08bf722ecb.jpeg

 

freak

 

by the way you argue topics it no wonder why you are so desperate to push rhetoric on little kids, cause you show no signs of being able to defend it to a adults. 

 

bro.

Posted
11 minutes ago, Buffarukus said:

 

by the way you argue topics it no wonder why you are so desperate to push rhetoric on little kids, cause you show no signs of being able to defend it to a adults. 

 

bro.

 

Defend what? Things that aren't' happening in first grade?

 

You're such a victim, precious.

 

 

 

Posted
12 hours ago, Buffarukus said:

 

this entire thread you  look really desperate to want adult strangers to talk to young children about sexuality without the parents knowing. the bill is for ANY sexuality, gay, straight..any! they are fng children man. that's it! media says its for gay only and you all blindly rush towards that virtue signal to blindly follow their bs rhetoric. but its not a cult. biology and teaching about sex ed, trans, gay whatever can come later when they are older in school or at any time by the parent. no law against that. the hell is wrong with you people? you ask when do people know when they are straight, who cares! the question is when is it appropriate to teach sex ed!? 

 

so twist it into anything you need to try and live with that fact. bring up criminals doing criminal things to just use as a talking point as if they even relate to the topic of the lefts infatuation with young children. seeing the left and yourself desperately NEEDING to do this is as sick as it gets. get ahold of yourself and read the bill. if you oppose it, seriously stay away from kids cause there is something very wrong with you.

 

no joke.

 

 

 

It's like arguing with you:

 

 

Posted
27 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

It's like arguing with you:

 

 

 

cut and paste opinion from a twitter thread to give billstime a perspective for him!? shocking! impressive research as usual. lets see..... mathew chapman a program developer "on the spectrum" is the new cult leader for billstime or is dreamweasel?

 

whenever you want to cut and paste from the actual bill that "conversations on the existence of families with two moms and dads is illegal".  

 

so many members have gone through this bs with you repeatedly. how bout just this one time. you actually read the bill and back up what nonsense twitter oops i mean you say.

 

its  more reading then twitter but no memes to distract you. so on the pdf its page 4 #3 that most closely resembles the lie your trying to tell. 

 

ill hold my breath waiting on any new information.  

Posted
2 minutes ago, Buffarukus said:

 

cut and paste opinion from a twitter thread to give billstime a perspective for him!? shocking! impressive research as usual. lets see..... mathew chapman a program developer "on the spectrum" is the new cult leader for billstime or is dreamweasel?

 

whenever you want to cut and paste from the actual bill that "conversations on the existence of families with two moms and dads is illegal".  

 

so many members have gone through this bs with you repeatedly. how bout just this one time. you actually read the bill and back up what nonsense twitter oops i mean you say.

 

its  more reading then twitter but no memes to distract you. so on the pdf its page 4 #3 that most closely resembles the lie your trying to tell. 

 

ill hold my breath waiting on any new information.  

 

LMAO - I read the bill - I copied and pasted nearly all of it (two pages lol) - right into this thread.

 

Sorry you missed it!

 

This bill exists for one reason - and one reason only.

 

Hate.

 

We have already established that and we have already established that the right does NOT care about kids.

 

Next?

 

 

 

Posted
On 4/13/2022 at 10:58 PM, BillStime said:


You hate everyone don’t you

 

Women

Blacks

Gays

 

typical closet case 

 

What is a closet case, Billsy? 

Posted
On 4/13/2022 at 10:58 PM, BillStime said:


You hate everyone don’t you

 

Women

Blacks

Gays

 

typical closet case 

dems have thrown women under the bus, gotta take them off that list.

Posted
10 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

LMAO - I read the bill - I copied and pasted nearly all of it (two pages lol) - right into this thread.

 

Sorry you missed it!

 

This bill exists for one reason - and one reason only.

 

Hate.

 

We have already established that and we have already established that the right does NOT care about kids.

 

Next?

 

 

 

 

no i definitely do not read what you post but you say you read the bill? so you just cut and paste lies on what it can enforce for what...propaganda? 

 

then switch to "what it really means" lol

 

do leftists ever dm you asking you to stop making them look bad?

 

anyways 

 

happy easter billstime. hope you have a good one. take a day off from defending groomers and enjoy the family..bro. 🐰

 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Buffarukus said:

 

no i definitely do not read what you post but you say you read the bill? so you just cut and paste lies on what it can enforce for what...propaganda? 

 

then switch to "what it really means" lol

 

do leftists ever dm you asking you to stop making them look bad?

 

anyways 

 

happy easter billstime. hope you have a good one. take a day off from defending groomers and enjoy the family..bro. 🐰

 

 

Defending groomers?  You're the one conditioning our children to be ashamed, to question and feel uncomfortable so they can grow up to be just like your friends:


20 Republican Politicians Brought Down By Big Gay Sex Scandals

 

 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Tenhigh said:

You didn't answer the question.  Are you implying that another poster is secretly homosexual, ant that something is wrong with that?  

 

omfg - you asked me to define closet case and I provided an example that you clearly did not expect; hence the deflection.

 

×
×
  • Create New...