Q-baby! Posted December 26, 2018 Share Posted December 26, 2018 19 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Brilliant analysis from a top mind. Morning princess! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted December 26, 2018 Share Posted December 26, 2018 8 hours ago, BigMcD said: Clown can barley put together a complete sentence Was this irony accidental, or an expression of your rye sense of humor? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 26, 2018 Share Posted December 26, 2018 2 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Was this irony accidental, or an expression of your rye sense of humor? The first one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Q-baby! Posted December 26, 2018 Share Posted December 26, 2018 1 minute ago, DC Tom said: Was this irony accidental, or an expression of your rye sense of humor? I did in hops that you would pick up on it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted December 26, 2018 Share Posted December 26, 2018 2 minutes ago, BigMcD said: I did in hops that you would pick up on it. Really feeling your oats now, aren't you? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 26, 2018 Share Posted December 26, 2018 21 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Just bumping this because it's terrific timing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Q-baby! Posted December 26, 2018 Share Posted December 26, 2018 7 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Really feeling your oats now, aren't you? How long have you been wheating to use that one? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Q-baby! Posted December 26, 2018 Share Posted December 26, 2018 26 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Just bumping this because it's terrific timing. That’s a long contract. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted December 26, 2018 Share Posted December 26, 2018 8 hours ago, ExiledInIllinois said: You nailed it... It's a boondoggle. Trust me, as a Democrat and a Fed Employee, I know a boondoggle when I see one. The lemmings that want the wall are being snowed. Makes good political theater. You ask too much when you ask people to trust you. From my perspective: 1. Your view on HRC as The Good Princess of the North disqualifies you as trustworthy in the political arena. 2. Your decision to actively seek out those with different political views with an eye toward demanding comeuppance and apologies for excersizing their right to vote disqualifies you as trustworthy in the political arena. 3. You seem to be implying that as a federal employee, you've witnessed first hand a number of "boondoggles", likely have written them off as just a byproduct of the federal system you work for and benefit from. For reasons you and you alone know, you see this particular boondoggle as extraordinary, and the particular boondoggle is by most accounts overtly political. Since you have self-identified as a Democrat, and I do not, it makes no sense whatsoever to trust you in this regard. 4. You have mentioned several times the point about "Mexico paying for the wall". This seems to be where you have decided to plant your flag, and it seems an odd place to do so. Those of us who support the Presidents efforts understand the complexity behind the word track used, even as you do not. Additionally, given 250 years of American political theater, it seems a weak place to make your stand. I won't bore you (further) by linking to statements/positions by politicians that were proven false, misleading or hypocritical, some even by your Dems. This alone disqualifies you from being someone I can trust to consider my best interests politically. 5. You have referred to 60+ million people as "lemmings". This statement alone disqualifies you as someone I might ever trust for political advise or discourse. To summarize, you seem to be an insider comfortable with boondoggles and waste so long as you benefit, your opinion is guided by your political ideaology, you feel you have the right to demand folks with different opinions conform to your world view, and that those who do not are of low moral character. You greatly respect a candidate who referred to citizens who disagreed with her politically in that odd sort of Stalin-esque fashion as "deplorable" and "irredeamable". No sir, you cannot be trusted. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted December 26, 2018 Share Posted December 26, 2018 Just now, leh-nerd skin-erd said: You ask too much when you ask people to trust you. From my perspective: 1. Your view on HRC as The Good Princess of the North disqualifies you as trustworthy in the political arena. 2. Your decision to actively seek out those with different political views with an eye toward demanding comeuppance and apologies for excersizing their right to vote disqualifies you as trustworthy in the political arena. 3. You seem to be implying that as a federal employee, you've witnessed first hand a number of "boondoggles", likely have written them off as just a byproduct of the federal system you work for and benefit from. For reasons you and you alone know, you see this particular boondoggle as extraordinary, and the particular boondoggle is by most accounts overtly political. Since you have self-identified as a Democrat, and I do not, it makes no sense whatsoever to trust you in this regard. 4. You have mentioned several times the point about "Mexico paying for the wall". This seems to be where you have decided to plant your flag, and it seems an odd place to do so. Those of us who support the Presidents efforts understand the complexity behind the word track used, even as you do not. Additionally, given 250 years of American political theater, it seems a weak place to make your stand. I won't bore you (further) by linking to statements/positions by politicians that were proven false, misleading or hypocritical, some even by your Dems. This alone disqualifies you from being someone I can trust to consider my best interests politically. 5. You have referred to 60+ million people as "lemmings". This statement alone disqualifies you as someone I might ever trust for political advise or discourse. To summarize, you seem to be an insider comfortable with boondoggles and waste so long as you benefit, your opinion is guided by your political ideaology, you feel you have the right to demand folks with different opinions conform to your world view, and that those who do not are of low moral character. You greatly respect a candidate who referred to citizens who disagreed with her politically in that odd sort of Stalin-esque fashion as "deplorable" and "irredeamable". No sir, you cannot be trusted. You're putting a lot of effort in to rebutting someone who's only coherent when complaining about fish... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted December 26, 2018 Share Posted December 26, 2018 36 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: You ask too much when you ask people to trust you. From my perspective: 1. Your view on HRC as The Good Princess of the North disqualifies you as trustworthy in the political arena. 2. Your decision to actively seek out those with different political views with an eye toward demanding comeuppance and apologies for excersizing their right to vote disqualifies you as trustworthy in the political arena. 3. You seem to be implying that as a federal employee, you've witnessed first hand a number of "boondoggles", likely have written them off as just a byproduct of the federal system you work for and benefit from. For reasons you and you alone know, you see this particular boondoggle as extraordinary, and the particular boondoggle is by most accounts overtly political. Since you have self-identified as a Democrat, and I do not, it makes no sense whatsoever to trust you in this regard. 4. You have mentioned several times the point about "Mexico paying for the wall". This seems to be where you have decided to plant your flag, and it seems an odd place to do so. Those of us who support the Presidents efforts understand the complexity behind the word track used, even as you do not. Additionally, given 250 years of American political theater, it seems a weak place to make your stand. I won't bore you (further) by linking to statements/positions by politicians that were proven false, misleading or hypocritical, some even by your Dems. This alone disqualifies you from being someone I can trust to consider my best interests politically. 5. You have referred to 60+ million people as "lemmings". This statement alone disqualifies you as someone I might ever trust for political advise or discourse. To summarize, you seem to be an insider comfortable with boondoggles and waste so long as you benefit, your opinion is guided by your political ideaology, you feel you have the right to demand folks with different opinions conform to your world view, and that those who do not are of low moral character. You greatly respect a candidate who referred to citizens who disagreed with her politically in that odd sort of Stalin-esque fashion as "deplorable" and "irredeamable". No sir, you cannot be trusted. He's turned into a complete clown whereas there was a time when he made a little sense (on the rare occasion). He argues to hear himself argue and is not worth your time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
outsidethebox Posted December 26, 2018 Share Posted December 26, 2018 For the life of me, I don't understand the deep seated hatred in the hearts of the far left. Liberalism is a disease. I actually feel sorry for anyone going through life so bitter. Pretty sad.... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plenzmd1 Posted December 26, 2018 Share Posted December 26, 2018 40 minutes ago, westside said: For the life of me, I don't understand the deep seated hatred in the hearts of the far left. Liberalism is a disease. I actually feel sorry for anyone going through life so bitter. Pretty sad.... what in the world are you talking about? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted December 26, 2018 Share Posted December 26, 2018 3 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: Brilliant analysis from a top mind. I will tell you what... I am not going shopping with you if you can't follow the play. You can stay in the car. LoL... No way are you talking to the salespeople! We don't want to get upsold! Remember... If you do decide to go in. WE ARE NOT PAYING. MEXICO IS PAYING! Ready? On three...One, Two, Three... Break! ?Holy Moly, now I know how the Bills offense feels! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 26, 2018 Share Posted December 26, 2018 Just now, ExiledInIllinois said: I will tell you what... I am not going shopping with you if you can't follow the play. You can stay in the car. LoL... No way are you talking to the salespeople! We don't want to get upsold! Remember... If you do decide to go in. WE ARE NOT PAYING. MEXICO IS PAYING! Ready? On three...One, Two, Three... Break! ?Holy Moly, now I know how the Bills offense feels! Find one time I ever suggested or cared that Mexico would pay for a wall. You can't do it. Which means you're posting nonsense because you have nothin of substance to offer in regards to the point I made - which is true. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
outsidethebox Posted December 26, 2018 Share Posted December 26, 2018 3 minutes ago, plenzmd1 said: what in the world are you talking about? You know what I'm talking about. The anger on the left is very real. That's why I walked away. I don't want to be part of so much hate, from antifa to msm. Very hateful. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 26, 2018 Share Posted December 26, 2018 1 minute ago, westside said: You know what I'm talking about. The anger on the left is very real. That's why I walked away. I don't want to be part of so much hate, from antifa to msm. Very hateful. Those suffering from acute TDS don't see it as anger or hatred - it's righteousness. Their opinions must be your opinions too or else you're a lesser human and worthy of scorn. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted December 26, 2018 Share Posted December 26, 2018 17 minutes ago, DC Tom said: You're putting a lot of effort in to rebutting someone who's only coherent when complaining about fish... I never claimed i was not an idiot. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted December 26, 2018 Share Posted December 26, 2018 1 hour ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: You ask too much when you ask people to trust you. From my perspective: 1. Your view on HRC as The Good Princess of the North disqualifies you as trustworthy in the political arena. 2. Your decision to actively seek out those with different political views with an eye toward demanding comeuppance and apologies for excersizing their right to vote disqualifies you as trustworthy in the political arena. 3. You seem to be implying that as a federal employee, you've witnessed first hand a number of "boondoggles", likely have written them off as just a byproduct of the federal system you work for and benefit from. For reasons you and you alone know, you see this particular boondoggle as extraordinary, and the particular boondoggle is by most accounts overtly political. Since you have self-identified as a Democrat, and I do not, it makes no sense whatsoever to trust you in this regard. 4. You have mentioned several times the point about "Mexico paying for the wall". This seems to be where you have decided to plant your flag, and it seems an odd place to do so. Those of us who support the Presidents efforts understand the complexity behind the word track used, even as you do not. Additionally, given 250 years of American political theater, it seems a weak place to make your stand. I won't bore you (further) by linking to statements/positions by politicians that were proven false, misleading or hypocritical, some even by your Dems. This alone disqualifies you from being someone I can trust to consider my best interests politically. 5. You have referred to 60+ million people as "lemmings". This statement alone disqualifies you as someone I might ever trust for political advise or discourse. To summarize, you seem to be an insider comfortable with boondoggles and waste so long as you benefit, your opinion is guided by your political ideaology, you feel you have the right to demand folks with different opinions conform to your world view, and that those who do not are of low moral character. You greatly respect a candidate who referred to citizens who disagreed with her politically in that odd sort of Stalin-esque fashion as "deplorable" and "irredeamable". No sir, you cannot be trusted. Dude. DC Tom said it in under 20 words and that's mainly a bi-partisan issue! LMAO! I am just an idiot with my safety shoes on the ground. Power forward... No need to trust. Just live and learn Grasshopper. You'll believe what you will want to believe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plenzmd1 Posted December 26, 2018 Share Posted December 26, 2018 9 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Those suffering from acute TDS don't see it as anger or hatred - it's righteousness. Their opinions must be your opinions too or else you're a lesser human and worthy of scorn. same as the MAGA folks no? show me a difference between the two extremes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts