teef Posted December 12, 2018 Posted December 12, 2018 1 minute ago, Royale with Cheese said: You don't watch Modern Family? Tell me you're joking. i don't. not that i dislike it, but i'm on a netflix roll, and my wife prefers murder porn.
thebandit27 Posted December 12, 2018 Posted December 12, 2018 5 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said: Oh I'm relaxed. I just want to see the proof of your belief that Allen is under more duress. Since his return from injury, I have seen Allen have time in the pocket to stand tall and go through progressions on a number of occasions before picking his target and letting it rip. 2018 NFL Offensive Line Rankings: All 32 teams' units after Week 12 | NFL Analysis | Pro Football Focus They are both terrible units. The Cardinals are worse. Well I posted the FO metrics once, and I also posted the pressure percentage allowed. I'll post it again for posterity, but I'm not sure how much more you want to see.
26CornerBlitz Posted December 12, 2018 Posted December 12, 2018 1 minute ago, thebandit27 said: Well I posted the FO metrics once, and I also posted the pressure percentage allowed. I'll post it again for posterity, but I'm not sure how much more you want to see. I saw it and it means neither unit is good. 40.7% to 37.8% from ESPN which awful for both. The numbers PFO has on the Cardinals' OL don't match up with what I see or any other statistical sight that measures such things. All of those types of sites have some subjectivity in their methodology.
thebandit27 Posted December 12, 2018 Posted December 12, 2018 1 minute ago, 26CornerBlitz said: I saw it and it means neither unit is good. 40.7% to 37.8% from ESPN which awful for both. The numbers PFO has on the Cardinals' OL don't match up with what I see or any other statistical sight that measures such things. All of those types of sites have some subjectivity in their methodology. And so you see my issue with citing DVOA as evidence to support your OL assertion when you otherwise marginalize OL statistics from the very same entity? Because, remember, that was my original reply to you on this particular discussion point.
NewEra Posted December 12, 2018 Posted December 12, 2018 (edited) 42 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said: The Bills' OL stinks too and they need upgrades especially the interior as I have been posting all season long. The Cardinals are worse off. They have Johnson and Fitz, but their effectiveness is limited by OL play. If you're so confident, then back up your claims with numbers. I've already shown the Cardinals are the absolute worst in scoring and a number of other categories including DVOA and others I, yet somehow their OL is better? It does not add up. Then look those up and present them. Bandit came up with the numbers. Sorry I don’t have time to feverishly track down stats on websites. Someone else did. You say those stats don’t matter and come up with new stats. But they matter somehow because you watch all-22. Come on man. If the cards OL play is worse than the Bills, it’s not by a wide margin. Terrible Ol play is terrible Ol play. The only reason we move the balL and they never do is because Our QB is a 6’4 240 lb running back and Rosen just gets wrecked. You say Johnson and Fitz are good but the Ol makes it so they can’t be used effectively. We have shady. A dynamic RB......relegated to being one of the worst RB in football. We have shady and who? Shady and no one. The cardinals have better playmakers than we do. There is no doubt. Edit: i retire Edited December 12, 2018 by NewEra
26CornerBlitz Posted December 12, 2018 Posted December 12, 2018 (edited) 3 minutes ago, thebandit27 said: And so you see my issue with citing DVOA as evidence to support your OL assertion when you otherwise marginalize OL statistics from the very same entity? Because, remember, that was my original reply to you on this particular discussion point. My original point was they have the worst offense by far and they do in a number of categories including points scored. 1 minute ago, NewEra said: Bandit came up with the numbers. Sorry I don’t have time to feverishly track down stats on websites. Someone else did. You say those stats don’t matter and come up with new stats. But they matter somehow because you watch all-22. Come on man. If the cards OL play is worse than the Bills, it’s not by a wide margin. Terrible Ol play is terrible Ol play. The only reason we move the balL and they never do is because Our QB is a 6’4 240 lb running back and Rosen just gets wrecked. You say Johnson and Fitz are good but the Ol makes it so they can’t be used effectively. We have shady. A dynamic RB......relegated to being one of the worst RB in football. We have shady and who? Shady and no one. The cardinals have better playmakers than we do. There is no doubt. Cardinals' OL dead last here: 2018 NFL Offensive Line Rankings: All 32 teams' units after Week 12 | NFL Analysis | Pro Football Focus Edited December 12, 2018 by 26CornerBlitz
thebandit27 Posted December 12, 2018 Posted December 12, 2018 2 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said: My original point was they have the worst offense by far and they do in a number of categories including points scored. Sure, but the bone I picked was that you used their DVOA ranking in overall offense to buttress your stance on the OL: 1 hour ago, 26CornerBlitz said: Wrong again! 178 points scored which is DFL and they are last by far in DVOA rankings! Their worst in the NFL OL is why they are so punchless in both the run and pass game. They have exact zero starters on that unit who would replace any Buffalo Bill starter. Week 14 DVOA Ratings | Football Outsiders I was simply trying to point out the duality of citing DVOA as evidence of a league-worst OL when the very same site that calculates DVOA ranks them well above Buffalo in every OL category...which you seemed to agree with when you called rankings/ratings of such nature subjective. Guess I don't really have much to add beyond that. 1
26CornerBlitz Posted December 12, 2018 Posted December 12, 2018 3 minutes ago, thebandit27 said: Sure, but the bone I picked was that you used their DVOA ranking in overall offense to buttress your stance on the OL: I was simply trying to point out the duality of citing DVOA as evidence of a league-worst OL when the very same site that calculates DVOA ranks them well above Buffalo in every OL category...which you seemed to agree with when you called rankings/ratings of such nature subjective. Guess I don't really have much to add beyond that. I had not looked at any OL rankings at that point. Theirs is an outlier from my eye, other rankings from various sources , and the bottom line offensive production by points scored.
Magox Posted December 12, 2018 Posted December 12, 2018 (edited) Can we just admit that they both have terrible lines and it's arguable to say that one is worse than the other? And can we admit that the Allen has a strong argument in having a worse supporting cast than Arizona? Or at the very least equally as bad? And can we admit that Josh has arguably done more with a worse or equally bad supporting cast than Rosen? Edited December 12, 2018 by Magox 1
Royale with Cheese Posted December 12, 2018 Posted December 12, 2018 1 hour ago, teef said: i don't. not that i dislike it, but i'm on a netflix roll, and my wife prefers murder porn. Modern Family = murder porn
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted December 12, 2018 Posted December 12, 2018 On 12/11/2018 at 3:05 PM, Rochesterfan said: I can’t imagine any of the teams that got a QB are having remorse right now. All have shown progress and all potentially give hope to the future. The only buyers remorse I can think is the teams like the Giants that really now appear to need a QB and were in position, but did not take one and they ended up with Barkley who is having himself a good season. Other teams like the Jags might regret missing out, but their draft position precluded a big move up and I am not sure Jackson is what they would have wanted. ...agree RF....way, WAY too early to start talking "buyers' remorse" about this class...........look at the Mahomes kid.....plenty of posting pundits who wanted no part of a "leper like" Air Raid offense product......plenty of "no Air Raid QB succeeds in the NFL" quips......and that SAME gang is drooling all over their penny loafers claiming to have said, "see I told you he'd be good....Bflo BLEW the pick"...... 1
GoBills808 Posted December 12, 2018 Posted December 12, 2018 Did we ever get to the bottom of which offensive line is worse between the Bills and the Cardinals?
Mike in Horseheads Posted December 12, 2018 Posted December 12, 2018 4 hours ago, Teddy KGB said: Hes so desperate for Rosen to outplay Allen ???? 26CP...new pastor at COR (church of rosen)
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted December 13, 2018 Posted December 13, 2018 Rosen is the worst of the bunch. Sorry I don’t have a tweet from someone else to support my opinions
Trogdor Posted December 13, 2018 Posted December 13, 2018 On 12/11/2018 at 3:03 PM, Rc2catch said: For me Rosen actually looks the worst. He possibly has the best weapons and their offense just looks pathetic. Like ours the first half of the season lol only it’s been all year for them. Right now I think we’d kill to see allen with a washed up Fitzgerald and Christian Kirk with David Johnson Fitz was injured and David Johnson is a shell of himself. Throw in an Oline that might be worse than ours and you have a dumpster fire. They have even more to rebuild than the Bills. It's going to be a while.
Ayjent Posted December 13, 2018 Posted December 13, 2018 3 hours ago, Magox said: Can we just admit that they both have terrible lines and it's arguable to say that one is worse than the other? And can we admit that the Allen has a strong argument in having a worse supporting cast than Arizona? Or at the very least equally as bad? And can we admit that Josh has arguably done more with a worse or equally bad supporting cast than Rosen? I think that covers it. I think Rosen being worse at making plays is the difference between the two offenses and how bad the line looks. Allen is more mobile and able to extend plays and drives because of it. There is no question he is getting immediate pressure more than any QB in the league, and despite the line play he is showing progress and understanding of the game as the season goes on. I need to see more, but his reads are getting better and his running is the product of understanding what he sees for the taking. i think the Bills have more talent on the OL starting than the Cardinals, but the OL coaching is subpar for the Bills and the talent difference isn’t much. Outside of Dawkins who looks pretty average, the Bills OL is basically backup caliber on most teams that starts for the Bills. 1
Teddy KGB Posted December 13, 2018 Posted December 13, 2018 1 hour ago, Trogdor said: Fitz was injured and David Johnson is a shell of himself. Throw in an Oline that might be worse than ours and you have a dumpster fire. They have even more to rebuild than the Bills. It's going to be a while. Allen > Rosen though correct ?
HappyDays Posted December 13, 2018 Posted December 13, 2018 Not to wade into the exhilarating Cardinals vs Bills o-line debate but I think penalties are a fair tiebreaker. https://www.footballdb.com/stats/penalties.html?sort=oh Buffalo has 19 offensive holdings to Arizona's 10, and 20 false starts to Arizona's 15. In total penalty yards we have 919 to their 637 although it doesn't differentiate between offensive and defensive penalty yards. All in all it's fair to say Rosen has the edge in total offensive talent around him, and regardless Allen is accomplishing a lot more with what he has. Considering Rosen was supposed to be the pro-ready rookie that's concerning for him. 2
26CornerBlitz Posted December 13, 2018 Posted December 13, 2018 1 minute ago, HappyDays said: Not to wade into the exhilarating Cardinals vs Bills o-line debate but I think penalties are a fair tiebreaker. https://www.footballdb.com/stats/penalties.html?sort=oh Buffalo has 19 offensive holdings to Arizona's 10, and 20 false starts to Arizona's 15. In total penalty yards we have 919 to their 637 although it doesn't differentiate between offensive and defensive penalty yards. All in all it's fair to say Rosen has the edge in total offensive talent around him, and regardless Allen is accomplishing a lot more with what he has. Considering Rosen was supposed to be the pro-ready rookie that's concerning for him. No one with any objectivity would say that. Name all of this purported talent he's surrounded by.
HappyDays Posted December 13, 2018 Posted December 13, 2018 2 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said: No one with any objectivity would say that. Yeah I'm sure every objective football fan in the country would take Robert Foster, Zay Jones, and 30 year old Lesean McCoy over Larry Fitzgerald, Christian Kirk, and 26 year old David Johnson. 1 1
Recommended Posts