KD in CA Posted November 28, 2018 Share Posted November 28, 2018 20 minutes ago, Boyst62 said: You can get about any girl to look that good with angles, lightning and makeup brah And you can get any girl to look that bad in a drunk mug shot. The truth is always somewhere in the middle. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted November 28, 2018 Share Posted November 28, 2018 Just now, KD in CA said: And you can get any girl to look that bad in a drunk mug shot. The truth is always somewhere in the middle. Bingo. I see a bunch of Instagram girls trying to add me all the time and it's incredible. And then there are girls I know and I see the photos they post - totally unrealistic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Your Brown Eye Posted November 28, 2018 Share Posted November 28, 2018 Sure Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ridgewaycynic2013 Posted November 28, 2018 Share Posted November 28, 2018 20 hours ago, KD in CA said: In a closet at a wedding? Sure What is this? 'Clue'? Murder weapon she'll clock you with will be the champagne bottle. ? Impressive too, that she channels Bluto Blutarsky in her rant while in the squad car. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrader Posted November 28, 2018 Share Posted November 28, 2018 23 hours ago, Boyst62 said: How is it illegal for having sex with a wedding guest? That's irrelevant. Call me crazy, but I'd say it's peeing on the tree and then threatening to kill the cops' kids that gets her charged. The rest is just arrest report filler. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted November 28, 2018 Share Posted November 28, 2018 my apologies, i meant the OTW 8 for the other thread introduced by the usual suspect, I retract this one being an 8 on any planet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted November 28, 2018 Share Posted November 28, 2018 1 hour ago, shrader said: Call me crazy, but I'd say it's peeing on the tree and then threatening to kill the cops' kids that gets her charged. The rest is just arrest report filler. But the headline says arrested for having sex... Whiich is just retarded because it's not accurate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted November 28, 2018 Share Posted November 28, 2018 25 minutes ago, Boyst62 said: But the headline says arrested for having sex... Whiich is just retarded because it's not accurate fake news in the toilet, shocked!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbb Posted November 28, 2018 Share Posted November 28, 2018 17 minutes ago, Boyst62 said: But the headline says arrested for having sex... Whiich is just retarded because it's not accurate When's the last time you saw an accurate headline? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
\GoBillsInDallas/ Posted November 28, 2018 Author Share Posted November 28, 2018 5 minutes ago, bbb said: When's the last time you saw an accurate headline? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbb Posted November 28, 2018 Share Posted November 28, 2018 16 minutes ago, \GoBillsInDallas/ said: I guess it was properly refrigerated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted November 28, 2018 Share Posted November 28, 2018 more reliable than "trusted sources" nowadays 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted November 28, 2018 Share Posted November 28, 2018 On 11/27/2018 at 8:27 AM, Boyst62 said: How is it illegal for having sex with a wedding guest? That's irrelevant. Not illegal to have sex with a wedding guest, but other actions are The sex part precipitated, escalated the confrontation. She wasn't arrested for that. Reading comprehension is everything. It takes "two to tango." The other didn't seem to be arrested: "'...A security guard, an off-duty sheriff’s deputy, reported wedding guests had found Mehta having sex with a wedding guest in a room at the venue, according to an arrest report obtained by the Star-Telegram on Monday. Sheriff Larry Fowler said Mehta was a wedding photographer. Mehta left the room, walked to a fountain and began to yell. She then went to a nearby tree and urinated, according to the warrant. She was placed in a patrol car, where she reportedly threatened deputies as she was driven to jail..." "...Mehta faces charges of public intoxication and obstruction/retaliation, according to jail records." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted November 28, 2018 Share Posted November 28, 2018 nobody is blamed for failing to have 100% "reading comprehension" on a POS story like this... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrader Posted November 28, 2018 Share Posted November 28, 2018 (edited) 1 hour ago, Boyst62 said: But the headline says arrested for having sex... Whiich is just retarded because it's not accurate Was it changed at some point? Here is the headline I see: Quote Wedding photographer jailed after reportedly having sex with guest, urinating in public That doesn't say she was arrested for having sex. Edited November 28, 2018 by shrader Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted November 28, 2018 Share Posted November 28, 2018 27 minutes ago, shrader said: Was it changed at some point? Here is the headline I see: That doesn't say she was arrested for having sex. Jailed for having sex.... Same thing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhoTom Posted November 28, 2018 Share Posted November 28, 2018 3 hours ago, Boyst62 said: Jailed for having sex.... Same thing "Jailed after" not "jailed for." Different things. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gugny Posted November 28, 2018 Share Posted November 28, 2018 28 minutes ago, WhoTom said: "Jailed after" not "jailed for." Different things. Don't try to let facts get in the way of a good false narrative. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrader Posted November 28, 2018 Share Posted November 28, 2018 1 hour ago, WhoTom said: "Jailed after" not "jailed for." Different things. That and it also ignores the second part of the headline. If you’re going to read it the way he did, the two have to at least be taken together. That second act, there’s no debate, is an arrestable offense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seasons1992 Posted November 29, 2018 Share Posted November 29, 2018 Axe murderer......pass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts