Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 11/28/2018 at 1:20 AM, Boyst62 said:

You can get about any girl to look that good with angles, lightning and makeup brah

Expand  

 

And you can get any girl to look that bad in a drunk mug shot.    The truth is always somewhere in the middle.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
  On 11/28/2018 at 1:41 AM, KD in CA said:

 

And you can get any girl to look that bad in a drunk mug shot.    The truth is always somewhere in the middle.

Expand  

Bingo.

 

I see a bunch of Instagram girls trying to add me all the time and it's incredible. And then there are girls I know and I see the photos they post - totally unrealistic 

Posted
  On 11/27/2018 at 2:27 PM, Boyst62 said:

How is it illegal for having sex with a wedding guest?   That's irrelevant. 

Expand  

 

Call me crazy, but I'd say it's peeing on the tree and then threatening to kill the cops' kids that gets her charged.  The rest is just arrest report filler.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted

my apologies, i meant the OTW 8 for the other thread introduced by the usual suspect, I retract this one being an 8 on any planet

Posted
  On 11/28/2018 at 2:26 PM, shrader said:

 

Call me crazy, but I'd say it's peeing on the tree and then threatening to kill the cops' kids that gets her charged.  The rest is just arrest report filler.

Expand  

But the headline says arrested for having sex... Whiich is just retarded because it's not accurate

Posted
  On 11/28/2018 at 4:17 PM, Boyst62 said:

But the headline says arrested for having sex... Whiich is just retarded because it's not accurate

Expand  

 

When's the last time you saw an accurate headline?

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
  On 11/27/2018 at 2:27 PM, Boyst62 said:

How is it illegal for having sex with a wedding guest?   That's irrelevant. 

Expand  

Not illegal to have sex with a wedding guest, but other actions are 

 

The sex part precipitated, escalated the confrontation.

 

She wasn't arrested for that.  Reading comprehension is everything.

 

It takes "two to tango."  The other didn't seem to be arrested:

 

"'...A security guard, an off-duty sheriff’s deputy, reported wedding guests had found Mehta having sex with a wedding guest in a room at the venue, according to an arrest report obtained by the Star-Telegram on Monday.

Sheriff Larry Fowler said Mehta was a wedding photographer.

Mehta left the room, walked to a fountain and began to yell.

She then went to a nearby tree and urinated, according to the warrant.

She was placed in a patrol car, where she reportedly threatened deputies as she was driven to jail..."

 

"...Mehta faces charges of public intoxication and obstruction/retaliation, according to jail records."

Posted (edited)
  On 11/28/2018 at 4:17 PM, Boyst62 said:

But the headline says arrested for having sex... Whiich is just retarded because it's not accurate

Expand  

 

Was it changed at some point?  Here is the headline I see:

 

  Quote

Wedding photographer jailed after reportedly having sex with guest, urinating in public

Expand  

 

That doesn't say she was arrested for having sex.

Edited by shrader
Posted
  On 11/28/2018 at 9:20 PM, WhoTom said:

 

"Jailed after" not "jailed for." Different things.

 

 

Expand  

 

That and it also ignores the second part of the headline. If you’re going to read it the way he did, the two have to at least be taken together. That second act, there’s no debate, is an arrestable offense. 

×
×
  • Create New...