John from Riverside Posted March 24, 2005 Posted March 24, 2005 We have wanted to stone him for letting Jennings and Williams get away We have wanted to lynch him for not signing more quality OL free agents We have wanted to stretch him for not trading Travis Henry sooner BUT...... What if what has gone on this offseason is nothing more then the fact that Tom Donahoe realizes the only REAL way to biuld your line and not end up in cap hell is to DO IT THROUGH THE DRAFT - They are generally cheaper (especially if you aren't picking in the 1st round) - You get to keep them for longer - You get to biuld better continuity with them under a good OL coach Perhaps the swapping of picks in the Shelton/Henry trade has been TD's plan all along.....to get in a inexpensie LT.....then get a quality LG in the draft (and probably also a 2nd OL...hopefully a center) Perhaps there IS a method to TD's madness.....
1billsfan Posted March 24, 2005 Posted March 24, 2005 We have wanted to stone him for letting Jennings and Williams get away We have wanted to lynch him for not signing more quality OL free agents We have wanted to stretch him for not trading Travis Henry sooner BUT...... What if what has gone on this offseason is nothing more then the fact that Tom Donahoe realizes the only REAL way to biuld your line and not end up in cap hell is to DO IT THROUGH THE DRAFT - They are generally cheaper (especially if you aren't picking in the 1st round) - You get to keep them for longer - You get to biuld better continuity with them under a good OL coach Perhaps the swapping of picks in the Shelton/Henry trade has been TD's plan all along.....to get in a inexpensie LT.....then get a quality LG in the draft (and probably also a 2nd OL...hopefully a center) Perhaps there IS a method to TD's madness..... 286002[/snapback] What's with this "we" stuff???? Maybe the reactionists felt that way but the realists knew it's not smart to overpay for players.
ndmanley Posted March 24, 2005 Posted March 24, 2005 In a battle of wits between Donahoe and Green, I will take Donahoe anytime. He will get what we want. He is just trying to see who blinks first.
stevestojan Posted March 24, 2005 Posted March 24, 2005 Breaking news: TD knows you need 5 starting OLinemen. Apparently he took a sports management class at ECC North this winter and that was on the final... thank god.
John from Riverside Posted March 24, 2005 Author Posted March 24, 2005 What's with this "we" stuff???? Maybe the reactionists felt that way but the realists knew it's not smart to overpay for players. 286044[/snapback] Well...I meant we as a collective whole.....
seq004 Posted March 24, 2005 Posted March 24, 2005 While I do agree that the majority of your team should be built on the draft, (longer contracts) however when you have spot on your team that you've targeted as an immediate need due to the loss of a player or it is a need that hurts you year after year, then Free agency is the way to go IMO. If you just draft at that position it's more than likely you will continue to have the same problem for at the very least 1 to 2 years and theirs also the risk in drafting a player who has never played at the pro level. It's better to get something for Travis rather than nothing and right now I simply don't agree on not doing a player for player swap.
In space no one can hear Posted March 24, 2005 Posted March 24, 2005 BUT...... What if what has gone on this offseason is nothing more then the fact that Tom Donahoe realizes the only REAL way to biuld your line and not end up in cap hell is to DO IT THROUGH THE DRAFT I hate to be the one to bring you down to earth on this one....but.... This is Donahoes fifth draft The time to begin building the o-line through the draft was his first draft!!! I know that I am not as smart as the master poker player Donahoe, and I am not paid to be a G.M.
IDBillzFan Posted March 24, 2005 Posted March 24, 2005 Drafting is also a much bigger risk, IMHO. 286030[/snapback] A real draftnik may argue that offensive linesmen have some of the highest percentages of "effective" immediate gratification in terms of making it from the draft to the starting lineup and having an impact. Moreso than a QB, RB, or even receiver. If memory serves, Mr. Rich has an opinion on this topic. I'm just a humble draft day viewer.
jad1 Posted March 24, 2005 Posted March 24, 2005 BUT......What if what has gone on this offseason is nothing more then the fact that Tom Donahoe realizes the only REAL way to biuld your line and not end up in cap hell is to DO IT THROUGH THE DRAFT I hate to be the one to bring you down to earth on this one....but.... This is Donahoes fifth draft The time to begin building the o-line through the draft was his first draft!!! I know that I am not as smart as the master poker player Donahoe, and I am not paid to be a G.M. 286067[/snapback] Donahoe has picked up several offensive linemen in the draft. Not all have worked out, but that's the nature of the draft. And let's not forget that he also had to rebuild other areas of the team. It's not like the only area of need over the last 4 years has been offensive line.
San-O Posted March 24, 2005 Posted March 24, 2005 BUT......What if what has gone on this offseason is nothing more then the fact that Tom Donahoe realizes the only REAL way to biuld your line and not end up in cap hell is to DO IT THROUGH THE DRAFT I hate to be the one to bring you down to earth on this one....but.... This is Donahoes fifth draft The time to begin building the o-line through the draft was his first draft!!! I know that I am not as smart as the master poker player Donahoe, and I am not paid to be a G.M. 286067[/snapback] Thank you. How many starting O-linemen did TD draft, Oh yeah ONE.
San-O Posted March 24, 2005 Posted March 24, 2005 We have wanted to stone him for letting Jennings and Williams get away We have wanted to lynch him for not signing more quality OL free agents We have wanted to stretch him for not trading Travis Henry sooner BUT...... What if what has gone on this offseason is nothing more then the fact that Tom Donahoe realizes the only REAL way to biuld your line and not end up in cap hell is to DO IT THROUGH THE DRAFT - They are generally cheaper (especially if you aren't picking in the 1st round) - You get to keep them for longer - You get to biuld better continuity with them under a good OL coach Perhaps the swapping of picks in the Shelton/Henry trade has been TD's plan all along.....to get in a inexpensie LT.....then get a quality LG in the draft (and probably also a 2nd OL...hopefully a center) Perhaps there IS a method to TD's madness..... 286002[/snapback] This realization is coming about, oh, four years too late. Did I mention we are starting a rookie QB this year also with no LT? Yet.
San-O Posted March 24, 2005 Posted March 24, 2005 Donahoe has picked up several offensive linemen in the draft. Not all have worked out, but that's the nature of the draft. And let's not forget that he also had to rebuild other areas of the team. It's not like the only area of need over the last 4 years has been offensive line. 286089[/snapback] True. Haven't had an offensive line for more like 10 years. You must be a proponent of the 10 year rebuilding plan.
nodnarb Posted March 24, 2005 Posted March 24, 2005 'everyone' says he is? only idiots say that tom donahoe is an idiot. tom is well respected among league GMs and owners for a reason. The opinions of a few fans who THINK they know personnel but don't know a fraction of a fraction of what it takes to run an NFL franchise, mean absolutely nothing.
John from Riverside Posted March 24, 2005 Author Posted March 24, 2005 Thank you. How many starting O-linemen did TD draft, Oh yeah ONE. 286118[/snapback] TD didn't draft Jennings and Williams?
turftoe Posted March 24, 2005 Posted March 24, 2005 Next year's draft is rated higher than this one. By not signing any big free agents and letting both Williams and Jennings leave, we will probably get several extra picks in next year's draft. Perhaps 2 third round picks. Besides, next year we have Nate Clements and several other free agents to try to lock-up for long term deals. The future is still bright.
San-O Posted March 24, 2005 Posted March 24, 2005 'everyone' says he is? only idiots say that tom donahoe is an idiot. tom is well respected among league GMs and owners for a reason. The opinions of a few fans who THINK they know personnel but don't know a fraction of a fraction of what it takes to run an NFL franchise, mean absolutely nothing. 286124[/snapback] Yeah, New England loves him!
Dawgg Posted March 24, 2005 Posted March 24, 2005 Yes, on 3... everyone bend over for TD! One... two.... We have wanted to stone him for letting Jennings and Williams get away We have wanted to lynch him for not signing more quality OL free agents We have wanted to stretch him for not trading Travis Henry sooner BUT...... What if what has gone on this offseason is nothing more then the fact that Tom Donahoe realizes the only REAL way to biuld your line and not end up in cap hell is to DO IT THROUGH THE DRAFT - They are generally cheaper (especially if you aren't picking in the 1st round) - You get to keep them for longer - You get to biuld better continuity with them under a good OL coach Perhaps the swapping of picks in the Shelton/Henry trade has been TD's plan all along.....to get in a inexpensie LT.....then get a quality LG in the draft (and probably also a 2nd OL...hopefully a center) Perhaps there IS a method to TD's madness..... 286002[/snapback]
Recommended Posts