/dev/null Posted November 20, 2018 Posted November 20, 2018 Revoke her security clearance pending a review Something that was not but should have been applied to former Secretary Clinton
WhitewalkerInPhilly Posted November 20, 2018 Author Posted November 20, 2018 4 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: Ivanka Trump is crooked. There feel better? Does this make Hillary less shady? Oh no. I am totally cool with Hillary being exposed as a shady politician. I want shady politicians gone. Let's hold the current administration to at least the same standard of rigor, never mind all the previous nepotism claims that arose in the tariff exemptions for Ivanka's handbags made in China. Speaking of which, wasn't China a currency manipulator? ?
Chef Jim Posted November 20, 2018 Posted November 20, 2018 4 minutes ago, Tiberius said: You are missing the point. The complete hypocrisy of this by Trump and his "lock her up" supporters. No I get the point. It's not hard to follow idiocy. Just now, WhitewalkerInPhilly said: Oh no. I am totally cool with Hillary being exposed as a shady politician. I want shady politicians gone. Let's hold the current administration to at least the same standard of rigor, never mind all the previous nepotism claims that arose in the tariff exemptions for Ivanka's handbags made in China. Speaking of which, wasn't China a currency manipulator? ? So you're saying the current administration is not under the same amount of scrutiny as previous administrations?? Are you seriously asking for that?
WhitewalkerInPhilly Posted November 20, 2018 Author Posted November 20, 2018 Just now, /dev/null said: Revoke her security clearance pending a review Something that was not but should have been applied to former Secretary Clinton To be fair, she reported it and the fed recommended an investigation that...just never got followed up on. And yes, thay should have happened to Hillary. Wanting transparency and accountability means not letting the people you might often agree with slide when they screw up 2 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: No I get the point. It's not hard to follow idiocy. So you're saying the current administration is not under the same amount of scrutiny as previous administrations?? Are you seriously asking for that? I'm sorry, I completely missed the Congressional investigation that occurred when this was first reported. When did that happen again? *crickets*
Prickly Pete Posted November 20, 2018 Posted November 20, 2018 (edited) 49 minutes ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said: Oh come on, I know that it's not going to lead to anything. I personally doubt anything of significance happened, and I would be shocked if there are any actually repercussions. I just like to mention it because of the raging shitstorm that people on this board rained on Hillary Clinton for doing pretty much the exact same thing. We shall see...do you think she was setting up illegal, treasonous arms deals? Cuz that's what Hillary is suspected of doing. Nuff said? Or do we have to drag this ridiculous argument and comparison out? Edited November 20, 2018 by OJ Tom 3
3rdnlng Posted November 20, 2018 Posted November 20, 2018 (edited) OK guys, let's take a vote. Which one should receive a get out of jail free card, A or B? A B Edited November 20, 2018 by 3rdnlng 2
Golden Goat Posted November 20, 2018 Posted November 20, 2018 14 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: OK guys, let's take a vote. Which one should receive a get out of jail free card, A or B? A B Hillary. I want Bubba miserable for the rest of his life. 1
unbillievable Posted November 20, 2018 Posted November 20, 2018 (edited) So Ivanka used a private email until she got security training and later assigned a government account... ...Is this like Obama using his blackberry until they gave him a secure phone? Edited November 20, 2018 by unbillievable 3
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted November 20, 2018 Posted November 20, 2018 This thread was a bust. WiP draws me in under the guise of revealing hypocrisy, then folds like a cheap suit by acknowledging that what Ivanka did was nothing like what Hillary Clinton did. Best I can tell, the only connection is they both had email accounts. I feel cheated.
unbillievable Posted November 20, 2018 Posted November 20, 2018 Can we verify that she wasn't using a Russian email account? Ivankatrump.rus
DC Tom Posted November 20, 2018 Posted November 20, 2018 2 hours ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said: "Advisor" to the president. She had fullTop Secret clearance: https://www.axios.com/ivanka-trump-security-clearance-status-jared-kushner-f0ff4333-3665-4778-9c35-ba10bae55d94.html This means she has access to foreign intelligence and the president's daily intelligence briefing No, it doesn't. 1 hour ago, 3rdnlng said: OK guys, let's take a vote. Which one should receive a get out of jail free card, A or B? A B Conversely, which would you rather see in a women's prison? 1
Witless Bills Fan Posted November 20, 2018 Posted November 20, 2018 2 hours ago, TakeYouToTasker said: Again, explain how the two instances are in any way similar. Had Hillary Clinton done exactly what Ivanka Trump did no one would be making a big deal out of it. But she didn't. You're doing mental gymnastics to equate two things that are entirely dissimilar, and I'm requiring that you stick the landing. It's kind of like how President Trump and Hitler are similar. They don't share any of the traits that make Hitler Hitler, but they're both men, who were leaders of countries, who gave speeches, wore pants, and drank water. Just like here, Hillary and Ivanka both used email. If you stop focusing on the ways in which they're different, they're basically the same.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted November 21, 2018 Posted November 21, 2018 3 hours ago, GG said: WAPO & NYT Oh, that tricky "free press." Gotta love 'em.
BeginnersMind Posted November 21, 2018 Posted November 21, 2018 (edited) 4 hours ago, peace out said: Both this non-story and the above creepy photo are something the conspiracy guys would be excited about (if it was against the Deep State narrative). Don’t feed the beast. She used her personal email a few times during a transition time. BFD. Edited November 21, 2018 by BeginnersMind
Prickly Pete Posted November 21, 2018 Posted November 21, 2018 16 minutes ago, BeginnersMind said: Both this non-story and the above creepy photo are something the conspiracy guys would be excited about (if it was against the Deep State narrative). Don’t feed the beast. She used her personal email a few times during a transition time. BFD. "Waaaaaaah" You're gonna lose.
BeginnersMind Posted November 21, 2018 Posted November 21, 2018 14 minutes ago, OJ Tom said: "Waaaaaaah" You're gonna lose. I’m gonna lose what?
3rdnlng Posted November 21, 2018 Posted November 21, 2018 34 minutes ago, BeginnersMind said: I’m gonna lose what? Your virginity. Maybe, sometime in your future. Maybe to a woman. 2
Prickly Pete Posted November 21, 2018 Posted November 21, 2018 52 minutes ago, BeginnersMind said: I’m gonna lose what? You'll figure it out eventually...
Recommended Posts