Utah John Posted November 20, 2018 Posted November 20, 2018 It's now up to the Jags to figure out if he's worth that much going forward. He was effectively getting $99M for having one monster season. Just not worth the money here. Not the biggest bust in Bills history but he's on the short list.
Royale with Cheese Posted November 20, 2018 Posted November 20, 2018 3 minutes ago, Utah John said: It's now up to the Jags to figure out if he's worth that much going forward. He was effectively getting $99M for having one monster season. Just not worth the money here. Not the biggest bust in Bills history but he's on the short list. With their level of play right now, I'd rather have Star at his contract than Dareus level of play and current contract. If you give me 2014 Dareus....then yes, I would much rather have that at. But the reality is your paying for 2014 Dareus and not getting that level of play.
keepthefaith Posted November 20, 2018 Posted November 20, 2018 It appears he's been a better soldier in Jacksonville than he was in Buffalo.
YoloinOhio Posted November 20, 2018 Posted November 20, 2018 1 hour ago, BillsEnthusiast said: Jags fans are upset that he seems to be low effort. It's almost like that's why we traded him... I can’t believe he didn’t change! Did he ever settle those two sexual assault lawsuits? 1 hour ago, uticaclub said: Trading Dareus for a 5th for the biggest mistake this regime has made. For his dead cap & Stars contract, we should have just kept the more talent Dareus Soooo they got rid of his ridiculous contract, his ridiculous attitude, his sexual assault cases, and acquired their new starting LG on a rookie deal. How the hell is that a mistake?
Gugny Posted November 20, 2018 Posted November 20, 2018 I know I'm in the minority, here, but I believe that Dareus earned every penny he made whilst in Buffalo. 1
uticaclub Posted November 20, 2018 Posted November 20, 2018 34 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said: I can’t believe he didn’t change! Did he ever settle those two sexual assault lawsuits? Soooo they got rid of his ridiculous contract, his ridiculous attitude, his sexual assault cases, and acquired their new starting LG on a rookie deal. How the hell is that a mistake? I care about production on the field, more players than you think are scumbags. You are not going to tell me, we are better defense without him And don't give me we have the "2nd best D in the league" that's an example of stats being for losers 3
teef Posted November 20, 2018 Posted November 20, 2018 13 minutes ago, uticaclub said: I care about production on the field, more players than you think are scumbags. You are not going to tell me, we are better defense without him And don't give me we have the "2nd best D in the league" that's an example of stats being for losers lol!
Beast Posted November 20, 2018 Posted November 20, 2018 (edited) 2 hours ago, uticaclub said: Trading Dareus for a 5th for the biggest mistake this regime has made. For his dead cap & Stars contract, we should have just kept the more talent Dareus Why has it been a big mistake? Our defense has not been an issue. Edited November 20, 2018 by Binghamton Beast 1
freddyjj Posted November 20, 2018 Posted November 20, 2018 (edited) Why did OBD trade the big fella? Was it the synthetic weed, bad drag racer, late to meetings, weighing > 360 lbs OR WEARING THIS Edited November 20, 2018 by freddyjj
YoloinOhio Posted November 20, 2018 Posted November 20, 2018 2 hours ago, BringBackOrton said: Hide the Mongolian buffet. I imagine most buffets hide from him 1
BringBackOrton Posted November 20, 2018 Posted November 20, 2018 19 minutes ago, uticaclub said: I care about production on the field, more players than you think are scumbags. You are not going to tell me, we are better defense without him And don't give me we have the "2nd best D in the league" that's an example of stats being for losers If you like PRODUCTION, let me tell you about the tub of goo! Our big boy has 28 tackles in 10 games. For comparison, he had 39 tackles in 8 games under the Rexit. But TFL’s!!! He’s got one. What a stat stuffer. Sacks? Did you guess? One. Oh but he’s not a sack or tackle guy! He plays a different role! Wait. Dareus got his contract after posting 10 sacks and 12 TFLs in the 2014 season. Since then, the tub of goo has 10.5 sacks and 17 TFLs. #production #halfofforangechicken 2
YoloinOhio Posted November 20, 2018 Posted November 20, 2018 1 minute ago, BringBackOrton said: If you like PRODUCTION, let me tell you about the tub of goo! Our big boy has 28 tackles in 10 games. For comparison, he had 39 tackles in 8 games under the Rexit. But TFL’s!!! He’s got one. What a stat stuffer. Sacks? Did you guess? One. Oh but he’s not a sack or tackle guy! He plays a different role! Wait. Dareus got his contract after posting 10 sacks and 12 TFLs in the 2014 season. Since then, the tub of goo has 10.5 sacks and 17 TFLs. #production #halfofforangechicken They easily replaced him with Jordan Phillips off the waiver wire. 3
Scott7975 Posted November 20, 2018 Posted November 20, 2018 Our rushing and passing defense is the same or better than the jags this year.
Royale with Cheese Posted November 20, 2018 Posted November 20, 2018 44 minutes ago, uticaclub said: I care about production on the field, more players than you think are scumbags. You are not going to tell me, we are better defense without him And don't give me we have the "2nd best D in the league" that's an example of stats being for losers So you want to pay nearly $100 million when he isn't giving $100 million worth of production? The $100 million defensive tackles in the league are the disrupters. Something Dareus was in 2013 and 2014. Hasn't had anywhere near the level of production since then. You're paying top end of the salary for a guy that eats blocks...same thing Star is basically doing....which is why he's paid 1/2 as much.
FLFan Posted November 20, 2018 Posted November 20, 2018 46 minutes ago, uticaclub said: I care about production on the field, more players than you think are scumbags. You are not going to tell me, we are better defense without him And don't give me we have the "2nd best D in the league" that's an example of stats being for losers We are a better defense without him. This is objectively true.
John from Riverside Posted November 20, 2018 Posted November 20, 2018 2 hours ago, uticaclub said: Trading Dareus for a 5th for the biggest mistake this regime has made. For his dead cap & Stars contract, we should have just kept the more talent Dareus So much wrong with this post
Misterbluesky Posted November 20, 2018 Posted November 20, 2018 36 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said: They easily replaced him with Jordan Phillips off the waiver wire. He's been pretty darn solid...no reason for the Beane Counter not to lock him up to a three year deal....he's much better than Washington was.
teef Posted November 20, 2018 Posted November 20, 2018 22 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said: So you want to pay nearly $100 million when he isn't giving $100 million worth of production? The $100 million defensive tackles in the league are the disrupters. Something Dareus was in 2013 and 2014. Hasn't had anywhere near the level of production since then. You're paying top end of the salary for a guy that eats blocks...same thing Star is basically doing....which is why he's paid 1/2 as much. i don't understand why some would rather complain than look at the reality of the situation.
C.Biscuit97 Posted November 20, 2018 Posted November 20, 2018 The biggest shame is Marcell Dareus has Aaron Donald type of ability if he really wanted it. 1
Recommended Posts