Deranged Rhino Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 1 minute ago, Chicken Boo said: Evidence? What evidence? Alternative evidence? It's called reading. There are hundreds and hundreds of pages of evidence I've shared over the past two years on the subject of this administration and the coup attempt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Dude Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 I consider it the most horrific war ever fought. It would have been my honor to attend. I would have done so in any weather conditions. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 43 minutes ago, Rob's House said: The most important thing about this story is how clearly it illustrates the extent to which people feign outrage over things they couldn't care less about. Not only that, it's also served to flush out another troll or two. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 13 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: They're not laughing at you. They're laughing at your uniformed opinion that you're trying to pass off as fact. No, we're laughing at him. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Dude Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 4 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: **************************** Hypocrisy and projection is all they have left: Good for France. Perhaps maybe they'll stumble upon another Corsican general and find their balls again and really do something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 Just now, The_Dude said: I consider it the most horrific war ever fought. It would have been my honor to attend. I would have done so in any weather conditions. I would have as well, but then again, I'm not subject to the Presidential security protocols of the Secret Service or USMC, nor are you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 4 minutes ago, Chicken Boo said: The plot on Macron was uncovered on Nov. 6th. Is today NOT the 12th? So now you admit there was a security threat? And you're still thinking that Trump decided not to go just for the lolz? What you're proving, again, is you don't have the faintest idea of how security and logistics work for the presidential detail. But I'm guessing exposing your ignorance won't get you to change course. In fact, I bet you'll double down on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Dude Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 Just now, TakeYouToTasker said: I would have as well, but then again, I'm not subject to the Presidential security protocols of the Secret Service or USMC, nor are you. .....like the protocols that prohibit the POTUS from using cell phones? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 1 minute ago, The_Dude said: Good for France. You miss the point. Macron took the public stage to slam Trump for being a nationalist because he knew it would get play in the compromised media... and he also knew his own hypocrisy wouldn't be reported on by those same outlets. Nationalism isn't a racist term. It isn't an evil term. It isn't something to fear.... Unless you're heavily invested in pushing and securing the globalist agenda, then it's worse than cancer. Just now, The_Dude said: .....like the protocols that prohibit the POTUS from using cell phones? Story was debunked. You're behind the news cycle. ******************** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Dude Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: You miss the point. Macron took the public stage to slam Trump for being a nationalist because he knew it would get play in the compromised media... and he also knew his own hypocrisy wouldn't be reported on by those same outlets. Nationalism isn't a racist term. It isn't an evil term. It isn't something to fear.... Unless you're heavily invested in pushing and securing the globalist agenda, then it's worse than cancer. Story was debunked. You're behind the news cycle. ******************** 1. I was not defending nor attacking "nationalism." 2. If there was a story that came out that shows Trump doesn't use cell phones, yes I missed it. I'm not as glued to the computer as others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicken Boo Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 (edited) 15 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: So now you admit there was a security threat? Nice pivot, Kellyanne. Glad I got your attention. I never said there wasn't. I said it was a bs excuse when all the other leaders and Gen Kelly were able to make it but Trump was not. You go on about security protocol, yet you have no clue what that entails. You just pretend you do or is that the other guy? You're all the same to me, I get confused. Edited November 12, 2018 by Chicken Boo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 Just now, The_Dude said: 1. I was not defending nor attacking "nationalism." 2. If there was a story that came out that shows Trump doesn't use cell phones, yes I missed it. I'm not as glued to the computer as others. 1. I know you weren't. Macron was and you replied to the part of the story that spoke to you since you hate Muslims. 2. The story showed Trump uses gov't cell phones - which are secure, not a private unsecured phones - of course the retraction was buried days after the first news cycle hit. Which is how disinformation works. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Dude Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: 1. I know you weren't. Macron was and you replied to the part of the story that spoke to you since you hate Muslims. 2. The story showed Trump uses gov't cell phones - which are secure, not a private unsecured phones - of course the retraction was buried days after the first news cycle hit. Which is how disinformation works. 1. Macron spends $30,000 a year on makeup. I'm not at all interested in what he has to say. 2. Ehhh, I wasn't a commo guy and I don't know all the rules. But I had a government cell phone and there was nothing swoopy about it. Although, I'm sure the sensitivity of USAREC is a bit different than that of the POTUS. Maybe a tad. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 1 minute ago, Chicken Boo said: Nice pivot, Kellyanne. Glad I got your attention. I never said there wasn't. I said it was a bs excuse when all the other leaders and Gen Kelly were able to make it but Trump was not. Now the threat was real, but it's bs. Again, all you are doing is exposing your own ignorance. Who's more valuable? POTUS or his CoS? You're terrible at this logic. 2 minutes ago, Chicken Boo said: You go on about security protocol, yet you have no clue what that entails. I know from your own words I know much more about this area than you do. I've spent a great deal of time the past few years studying and working with people who protect the president for a living. You're wrong. 3 minutes ago, Chicken Boo said: You just pretend you do or is that the other guy? You're all the same to me, I get confused. You love to expose your own ignorance as if it's a positive. Just now, The_Dude said: 2. Ehhh, I wasn't a commo guy and I don't know all the rules. But I had a government cell phone and there was nothing swoopy about it. Although, I'm sure the sensitivity of USAREC is a bit different than that of the POTUS. Maybe a tad. SIGINT countermeasures in the WH (and around the WH) are probably more intense than at your average FOB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 This thread is now the dumbest thread on the board. Beating Start peterman threads 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicken Boo Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 7 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Now the threat was real, but it's bs. Again, all you are doing is exposing your own ignorance. Who's more valuable? POTUS or his CoS? You're terrible at this logic. I know from your own words I know much more about this area than you do. I've spent a great deal of time the past few years studying and working with people who protect the president for a living. You're wrong. You love to expose your own ignorance as if it's a positive. It's a job to post in this section. Christ! You spent time "studying and working with people who protect the President." What does that even mean? Am I supposed to be impressed? Am I supposed to believe you? You provided nothing but lip service and resorted to name calling, but you want me to take you seriously? Why would I? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 1 minute ago, Chicken Boo said: It's a job to post in this section. Christ! You spent time "studying and working with people who protect the President." What does that even mean? Am I supposed to be impressed? Am I supposed to believe you? It's called reading. You wander down here, drop some shade and get punched back and wonder why. It's because, by your own admission, you don't know who I am or what I stand for - yet that didn't stop you from calling me a Drudge/Fox/Breitbart conservative when I'm none of those things. If you don't want to look like a fool, you shouldn't say foolish things. Yet today, that's all you've said. 2 minutes ago, Chicken Boo said: You provided nothing but lip service and resorted to name calling, but you want me to take you seriously? Why would I? You've only provided lip service. You said there was no threat while acknowledging there was. You pretend as if you understand how security and logistics work, yet your word betray your ignorance. Back up your work, or be prepared for the push back. It's how this place works. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 21 minutes ago, The_Dude said: .....like the protocols that prohibit the POTUS from using cell phones? No, different from those. I think you know that though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 5 minutes ago, Chicken Boo said: It's a job to post in this section. Christ! You spent time "studying and working with people who protect the President." What does that even mean? Am I supposed to be impressed? Am I supposed to believe you? You provided nothing but lip service and resorted to name calling, but you want me to take you seriously? Why would I? Have you simply thought about taking the high road and agreeing to disagree if it's so much? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 On 11/10/2018 at 2:05 PM, Deranged Rhino said: You're still on the collusion train? It's been two years now of you running down here to pipe up about how collusion happened, Trump is going to jail and a traitor... only to end with you running away when asked to provide evidence to support your beliefs. So, show us some evidence of Russian/Trump collusion. You must have some by now, otherwise why would you still be believing a narrative that has long since been debunked? (see, my memes are better because they're accurate reflections of you) Logic ran away again when pressed for evidence to back up his claims. Funny how that always seems to work out that way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts