Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
38 minutes ago, /dev/null said:

2dqhn8.jpg

 

She's quite amazing pulling off a Congressional spot and coaching the Jets at the same time.  

  • Haha (+1) 3
Posted
On 1/11/2019 at 2:03 PM, Paulus said:

I love how people just assume the dems will squash her. Do you think it is all against one? 

 

There was this republican guy they said that about.

tenor.gif?itemid=7870358

 

Some of yall are just out of touch with outside age groups who happen to vote.

 

 

I was going to mention that. Still, don't let her trout face distract from Dizzy, the true goddess.

You guys really underestimate the power of social media, still. I don't get it. She was an IG girl, just like all these other ladies are doing. It is real enough for some of you neocons to put an hour of research into. It may prove enlightening.

She's a combination of Palin and Trump and it's awesome.  She's like Palin of the left (Democratic-socialist opposed to Tea Party leader) in which she's a talented politician that a certain group of people can relate to who is too lazy to get her facts straight and therefore is exposed.  With her social media prowess and Democratic establishment types wishing she'd just go away and Republicans trying to highlight her as the dire future of the Democratic Party....she reminds me of a 2015-2016 Trump where Republicans were helpless to stop him.  People should not underestimate her.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, Doc Brown said:

She's a combination of Palin and Trump and it's awesome.  She's like Palin of the left (Democratic-socialist opposed to Tea Party leader) in which she's a talented politician that a certain group of people can relate to who is too lazy to get her facts straight and therefore is exposed.  With her social media prowess and Democratic establishment types wishing she'd just go away and Republicans trying to highlight her as the dire future of the Democratic Party....she reminds me of a 2015-2016 Trump where Republicans were helpless to stop him.  People should not underestimate her.

Largely agree. The best way to counter her ideas is not to ridicule her abject stupidity, but to confront her ideas head on and refute them on the merits.

 

e.g. Her 70% tax bracket proposal. She correctly says the taxes used to be at those levels in the 50s and 60s. If she’s in favor of bringing back those rates, then she should fully embrace the tax shelters and loopholes that were in place at then time. Looking forward to hearing her pontificate on the virtues of real estate depreciation et al. 

 

Also, it would be a treat to hear her explain the morality of seizing other people’s earnings in an unequal manner. Can she explain why stores don’t have “progressive” pricing for their goods and services? I’ve yet to go to a store or gas station and have the price of what I’m purchasing be tied to how much I earn that year.

 

What would she say if someone asked her “How much should Bill Gates or Barbara Streisand pay for a gallon of gas, a quarter pound of Brie, or a pound of burger?” Why aren’t they paying “their fair share” for these consumables so that other people with fewer means could be paying less for the same goods and services? 

 

Is is she in favor of movie stars having legal residency in states without state taxes in order to avoid California state taxation?  

 

Does she want to raise the corporate tax rate back up to where it used to be and drive American companies and their money back offshore? Can she explain how that would be a great win for America? 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
50 minutes ago, Doc Brown said:

She's a combination of Palin and Trump and it's awesome.  She's like Palin of the left (Democratic-socialist opposed to Tea Party leader) in which she's a talented politician that a certain group of people can relate to who is too lazy to get her facts straight and therefore is exposed.  With her social media prowess and Democratic establishment types wishing she'd just go away and Republicans trying to highlight her as the dire future of the Democratic Party....she reminds me of a 2015-2016 Trump where Republicans were helpless to stop him.  People should not underestimate her.

 

Oh sure, former waitress = city council member, two term mayor, oil and gas commission member, governor and VP candidate. {insert eye roll} exactly like Palin. 

 

And and the only thing she (OC) has in common with President Trump is they are both serving their first terms in a political office - she got 12k votes in her primary to secure election in a heavily Democratic district, he got 63m votes and took on the MSM, Clinton machine and deep state.

 

Totally the same. 

 

The national review talking points in this new meme are crazy.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Nanker said:

Largely agree. The best way to counter her ideas is not to ridicule her abject stupidity, but to confront her ideas head on and refute them on the merits.

 

e.g. Her 70% tax bracket proposal. She correctly says the taxes used to be at those levels in the 50s and 60s. If she’s in favor of bringing back those rates, then she should fully embrace the tax shelters and loopholes that were in place at then time. Looking forward to hearing her pontificate on the virtues of real estate depreciation et al. 

 

Also, it would be a treat to hear her explain the morality of seizing other people’s earnings in an unequal manner. Can she explain why stores don’t have “progressive” pricing for their goods and services? I’ve yet to go to a store or gas station and have the price of what I’m purchasing be tied to how much I earn that year.

 

What would she say if someone asked her “How much should Bill Gates or Barbara Streisand pay for a gallon of gas, a quarter pound of Brie, or a pound of burger?” Why aren’t they paying “their fair share” for these consumables so that other people with fewer means could be paying less for the same goods and services? 

 

Is is she in favor of movie stars having legal residency in states without state taxes in order to avoid California state taxation?  

 

Does she want to raise the corporate tax rate back up to where it used to be and drive American companies and their money back offshore? Can she explain how that would be a great win for America? 

 

You don't argue with ideologues, because they are true believers who can't be swayed by the introduction of new information. 

 

What you do is you savagely attack and tear down their ideology, making it so obviously unappealing to the general public that they discard the ideologue.

Posted
1 hour ago, Nanker said:

Largely agree. The best way to counter her ideas is not to ridicule her abject stupidity, but to confront her ideas head on and refute them on the merits.

 

e.g. Her 70% tax bracket proposal. She correctly says the taxes used to be at those levels in the 50s and 60s. If she’s in favor of bringing back those rates, then she should fully embrace the tax shelters and loopholes that were in place at then time. Looking forward to hearing her pontificate on the virtues of real estate depreciation et al. 

 

Also, it would be a treat to hear her explain the morality of seizing other people’s earnings in an unequal manner. Can she explain why stores don’t have “progressive” pricing for their goods and services? I’ve yet to go to a store or gas station and have the price of what I’m purchasing be tied to how much I earn that year.

 

What would she say if someone asked her “How much should Bill Gates or Barbara Streisand pay for a gallon of gas, a quarter pound of Brie, or a pound of burger?” Why aren’t they paying “their fair share” for these consumables so that other people with fewer means could be paying less for the same goods and services? 

 

Is is she in favor of movie stars having legal residency in states without state taxes in order to avoid California state taxation?  

 

Does she want to raise the corporate tax rate back up to where it used to be and drive American companies and their money back offshore? Can she explain how that would be a great win for America? 

Counter her ideology with common sense and mock her into oblivion.

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Doc Brown said:

She's a combination of Palin and Trump and it's awesome.  She's like Palin of the left (Democratic-socialist opposed to Tea Party leader) in which she's a talented politician that a certain group of people can relate to who is too lazy to get her facts straight and therefore is exposed.  With her social media prowess and Democratic establishment types wishing she'd just go away and Republicans trying to highlight her as the dire future of the Democratic Party....she reminds me of a 2015-2016 Trump where Republicans were helpless to stop him.  People should not underestimate her.

 

If only she could get every single leftist network to follow her every move at every rally and every tweet and every word and every thing she does from sun up to sun down.

 

Because that's how you got Trump.

 

She's not a 2015-2016 Trump.

 

She's Wendy Davis with nicer shoes.

 

 

 

 

Edited by LABillzFan
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, 3rdnlng said:

Counter her ideology with common sense and mock her into oblivion.

  Republicans should just leave her alone and in the process tear the Democrats apart.  Biden and Clinton have to be very concerned about her impact on the party.  Throw out the standard playbook of sexual harassment allegations and being tied to the old white boy network in dealing with her.  Live by the identity politics sword and now die by that same sword.  Republicans going after AOC now is going to drive the more radical members of the Democratic Party into the laps of the party leaders.  Those leaders are going to say "see how afraid the Republicans are of us so lets unite in an effort to crush them."  Let the Democrats divide into factions including those ages 18-30 who may say "screw being pragmatic for the benefit of the party.  We are going to be around for a while so lets do a controlled burn of the old wood in the party so new ideas can finally breath free."

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
4 hours ago, LABillzFan said:

 

If only she could get every single leftist network to follow her every move at every rally and every tweet and every word and every thing she does from sun up to sun down.

 

Because that's how you got Trump.

Oh, it's coming.  We're moving closer to idiocracy.  

Posted
41 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

How can you be in love with looks alone?  Crazy is still crazy.  

I think this broad might have what it takes to be great. I could be totally off with the social media crud, though. Like, people are tuning into these IG girls taking a poop, or eating popcorn and watching a movie, or putting on socks. I know enough to know I am so very ignorant to this IG crud. It is catching on , and it annoys the hell out of me. As a single male in SoCal maybe I see this movement on the bottom rungs of the hell it is turning into. Or, perhaps I and just suffering from shellshock. But, that there, is one boss B word. I am in love with the idea of tagging along with her for the ride, man. 

Posted
2 hours ago, Paulus said:

I think this broad might have what it takes to be great. I could be totally off with the social media crud, though. Like, people are tuning into these IG girls taking a poop, or eating popcorn and watching a movie, or putting on socks. I know enough to know I am so very ignorant to this IG crud. It is catching on , and it annoys the hell out of me. As a single male in SoCal maybe I see this movement on the bottom rungs of the hell it is turning into. Or, perhaps I and just suffering from shellshock. But, that there, is one boss B word. I am in love with the idea of tagging along with her for the ride, man. 

 

You live in SoCal and you're in love with that nut job.  Well I guess when you refer to them as broads I can understand why you're single. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

You live in SoCal and you're in love with that nut job.  Well I guess when you refer to them as broads I can understand why you're single. 

He's so smooth.

Posted
1 hour ago, Chef Jim said:

 

You live in SoCal and you're in love with that nut job.  Well I guess when you refer to them as broads I can understand why you're single. 

 

1 hour ago, 3rdnlng said:

He's so smooth.

 

I mean, I get laid pretty regularly. I'm nothing special. 

 

That said, it is pretty sad you two try and distract from the fact your heads are so far up your arses you have absolutely no idea why things smell so bad. AOC is legit.

 

https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-female-president-190114063930734.html

Posted
9 minutes ago, Paulus said:

 

 

I mean, I get laid pretty regularly. I'm nothing special. 

 

That said, it is pretty sad you two try and distract from the fact your heads are so far up your arses you have absolutely no idea why things smell so bad. AOC is legit.

 

https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-female-president-190114063930734.html

 

While I appreciate their prediction that Trump will win in 2020, AOC is going to be irrelevant long before 2024. She'll be damned lucky if the Democrats don't primary her out of a job in 2020.

 

There is no way in hell she will ever connect with the moderate voters. She connects with an audience who doesn't actually vote.

×
×
  • Create New...