WhitewalkerInPhilly Posted January 4, 2019 Posted January 4, 2019 4 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: The GOP put no money into the race and it was still closer than anyone expected. This is a poor analysis. The GOP will dump millions into her district to attempt to unseat her in 2020. She'll have to actually campaign this time. ...and you think that what she's done since winning has, in any way...decreased her chances for reelection? It's been 26 years since the district voted Republican. I am going to take a wild guess that you haven't been to Astoria lately. I've been there, and people there have set up ICE warnings through social media. There's a reason why it kicked out an establishment Centrist. It's young, urban, and diverse, pretty much the anti-current Republican party (old, bum***** nowhere, old white men who like to yell at people of color on TV). I mean, miracles happen. But man... You talk about Trump living in liberal's heads rent free? ACO is your version of that.
Deranged Rhino Posted January 4, 2019 Posted January 4, 2019 Just now, WhitewalkerInPhilly said: ...and you think that what she's done since winning has, in any way...decreased her chances for reelection? It's been 26 years since the district voted Republican. I am going to take a wild guess that you haven't been to Astoria lately. I've been there, and people there have set up ICE warnings through social media. There's a reason why it kicked out an establishment Centrist. It's young, urban, and diverse, pretty much the anti-current Republican party (old, bum***** nowhere, old white men who like to yell at people of color on TV). I mean, miracles happen. But man... You talk about Trump living in liberal's heads rent free? ACO is your version of that. Wrong. Show me where I've said anything about her other than she won a non-contested election. She'll have to run for real next time. (And that means making compromises - like she did with Pelosi - that her progressive base will loathe)
Buffalo_Gal Posted January 4, 2019 Posted January 4, 2019 13 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: The GOP put no money into the race and it was still closer than anyone expected. This is a poor analysis. The GOP will dump millions into her district to attempt to unseat her in 2020. She'll have to actually campaign this time. Depending on how she votes it would not shock me if the Democrats dumped millions in to primary her.
Deranged Rhino Posted January 4, 2019 Posted January 4, 2019 Just now, Buffalo_Gal said: Depending on how she votes it would not shock me if the Democrats dumped millions in to primary her. They absolutely will. And with that money comes promises... promises that don't align with her platform. She'll have to compromise (gasp - GOVERN) and the prog-fascists will be very upset when she does so.
outsidethebox Posted January 4, 2019 Posted January 4, 2019 She's in way over her head. Not a good idea to piss off Nasty Pelosi on your first day. She better be watching over her shoulder. You know how Democrats end up with a double tap suicide in the back of the head. She's not called nasty pelosi for no reason.
Foxx Posted January 4, 2019 Posted January 4, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said: You might not like her politics, or think she's naïve, but man, she has a sense of humor. I will also second the "I would rather see her dancing than Maxine Waters or Nancy Pelosi" thats a knee slapper alright. Edited January 4, 2019 by Foxx 1
WhitewalkerInPhilly Posted January 4, 2019 Posted January 4, 2019 8 minutes ago, Foxx said: thats a knee slapper alright. Right...I'm talking to the group where " I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab ’em by the *****. You can do anything" is the preferred joke and not horribly rape-y.
Deranged Rhino Posted January 4, 2019 Posted January 4, 2019 NPCinPhilly hasn't had his talking points updated in a long time. Two years now and he still clings to statements made years ago that no one cared about during the election and even less people care about now. 1
Foxx Posted January 4, 2019 Posted January 4, 2019 9 minutes ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said: Right...I'm talking to the group where " I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab ’em by the *****. You can do anything" is the preferred joke and not horribly rape-y. ummm... okay. you do realize that probably the only other Reps that take her seriously are the other SJW's elected this year, right? 1
IDBillzFan Posted January 4, 2019 Posted January 4, 2019 In the end, she's just another predictable leftist who believes giving 70% of what you earn to the federal government is your "fair share." It's a good thing she's cute, cuz she's dumber than bricks.
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted January 4, 2019 Posted January 4, 2019 (edited) 12 minutes ago, LABillzFan said: In the end, she's just another predictable leftist who believes giving 70% of what you earn to the federal government is your "fair share." It's a good thing she's cute, cuz she's dumber than bricks. I didn't watch this when it originally aired, so I wasn't aware that she was referring to the "tippy top" of income when she spoke of taxation, like the ten millionth dollar and stuff. This is a game changer. We need to get serious with this taxy waxy program shes talking about. She's #4ReelZ. Edited January 4, 2019 by leh-nerd skin-erd
Koko78 Posted January 4, 2019 Posted January 4, 2019 27 minutes ago, LABillzFan said: In the end, she's just another predictable leftist who believes giving 70% of what you earn to the federal government is your "fair share." It's a good thing she's cute, cuz she's dumber than bricks. I wonder if she includes herself in the bracket that should pay 70%, or if the definition of "rich" who must pay their "fair share" starts just above her congressional salary.
DC Tom Posted January 4, 2019 Posted January 4, 2019 43 minutes ago, LABillzFan said: In the end, she's just another predictable leftist who believes giving 70% of what you earn to the federal government is your "fair share." It's a good thing she's cute, cuz she's dumber than bricks. I just want someone like her, for once, to explain what a "fair share" is. Forget "right" or "wrong," just explain your definition of "fair." That's all. Just explain to me, Sandy (yes, that's her nickname), what your own "fair share" of taxes is, and why it's fair. 3
sherpa Posted January 4, 2019 Posted January 4, 2019 Her 70% idea is to fund her "green deal," which is all fossil gone and no carbon emissions in 12 years. We can use all of our airports as wind farms and solar fields, since there sure isn't going to be any air transport industry.
Foxx Posted January 5, 2019 Posted January 5, 2019 2 hours ago, LABillzFan said: In the end, she's just another predictable leftist who believes giving 70% of what you earn to the federal government is your "fair share." It's a good thing she's cute, cuz she's dumber than bricks. we are so *****.
B-Man Posted January 5, 2019 Posted January 5, 2019 Quote Ben ShapiroVerified account @benshapiro 3h3 hours ago Media: AOC IS THE WAVE OF THE FUTURE! SHE'S SOOOO IMPORTANT! Conservatives: Okay. That's scary. Her policy is insane. Media: LOOK, SHE'S DANCING! YOU HATE THAT! Conservatives: Nah, her policy is just insane. Media: WHY ARE YOU SO OBSESSED WITH HER? . 1
njbuff Posted January 5, 2019 Posted January 5, 2019 I swear I lose brain cells every time this kid speaks.
Recommended Posts