row_33 Posted January 29, 2019 Posted January 29, 2019 9 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: They want to wait to announce her status until 2020 is underway so they can Garland the next nom. it's not going to change until November 2020 at the earliest.... GOP Senate will take any nomination of the GEOTUS
Deranged Rhino Posted January 29, 2019 Posted January 29, 2019 1 minute ago, row_33 said: it's not going to change until November 2020 at the earliest.... GOP Senate will take any nomination of the GEOTUS Oh, I agree they will. I'm just saying that seems to be the RBG plan on the left. She's being hidden to preserve her job. Another replacement on SCOTUS by Trump would be check mate for the uniparty. 1
row_33 Posted January 29, 2019 Posted January 29, 2019 24 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Oh, I agree they will. I'm just saying that seems to be the RBG plan on the left. She's being hidden to preserve her job. Another replacement on SCOTUS by Trump would be check mate for the uniparty. The Dems have forgotten that they couldn't get in that SC justice because the GOP had a majority in the Senate?
Deranged Rhino Posted January 29, 2019 Posted January 29, 2019 1 minute ago, row_33 said: The Dems have forgotten that they couldn't get in that SC justice because the GOP had a majority in the Senate? I don't think they've forgotten as much as they don't care. With the media behind them, they can raise a HUGE stink about any nomination coming in 2020.
IDBillzFan Posted January 29, 2019 Posted January 29, 2019 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: I don't think they've forgotten as much as they don't care. With the media behind them, they can raise a HUGE stink about any nomination coming in 2020. Absolutely. They have set the precedent to move any narrative regardless of facts. Journalism standards no longer begin with the 5 Ws, but the 1 If. "If true..." 1
row_33 Posted January 29, 2019 Posted January 29, 2019 16 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: I don't think they've forgotten as much as they don't care. With the media behind them, they can raise a HUGE stink about any nomination coming in 2020. but the votes will be 53 Yes and 47 Nay at the worst 1
Deranged Rhino Posted January 29, 2019 Posted January 29, 2019 Just now, row_33 said: but the votes will be 53 Yes and 47 Nay at the worst I think you're probably correct - but enough media pressure would bring that number down a bit. Mittens wouldn't vote with Trump, for example. If the media pressure is intense enough, some of the more "moderate" Rs might start to wobble. They'd need to flip two more besides Mitt though, that's a tough order - but not impossible.
row_33 Posted January 29, 2019 Posted January 29, 2019 14 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: I think you're probably correct - but enough media pressure would bring that number down a bit. Mittens wouldn't vote with Trump, for example. If the media pressure is intense enough, some of the more "moderate" Rs might start to wobble. They'd need to flip two more besides Mitt though, that's a tough order - but not impossible. I believe there are always 4-5 Democrats who are decent folk and vote common sense on votes that will matter. It would be better, especially for a woman Justice. 1
Nanker Posted January 29, 2019 Posted January 29, 2019 Well, if she isn't already dead, she's knock, knock, knocking on Death's door. I seriously doubt she has the stamina and faculties to carry out the duties of her office.
Hedge Posted January 29, 2019 Posted January 29, 2019 11 minutes ago, Nanker said: Well, if she isn't already dead, she's knock, knock, knocking on Death's door. I seriously doubt she has the stamina and faculties to carry out the duties of her office. She The situation is a pickle.
DC Tom Posted January 29, 2019 Posted January 29, 2019 2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Hmmm Unknown sources say she's at an unknown hospital for unknown reasons. Buzzfeed must be beside themselves with jealousy. 3
row_33 Posted January 29, 2019 Posted January 29, 2019 15 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Hmmm we can wait out until she hopefully recovers
Foxx Posted January 29, 2019 Posted January 29, 2019 On 1/19/2019 at 8:56 AM, Foxx said: RBG has developed complications with pneumonia and is fighting for her life? the outlet that first reported she had lung cancer is now reporting she is deathly ill. Stricken with Pneumonia, Ruth Bader Ginsburg Cancels Event Set for January 29, 2019 ... Following surgery, she has developed complications including pneumonia. Pneumonia often afflicts elderly post surgery patients in the US, since antibiotics have resulted in Multi Resistant Strains of the lung infection. ... 5 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Hmmm seems that article from the outlet that first reported her lung cancer may have correct. 1
Deranged Rhino Posted January 29, 2019 Posted January 29, 2019 Just now, DC Tom said: Unknown sources say she's at an unknown hospital for unknown reasons. Buzzfeed must be beside themselves with jealousy. Completely agree that this should be viewed with a HUGE grain of salt for those exact reasons.
row_33 Posted January 29, 2019 Posted January 29, 2019 this is like when General Secretary Andropov died and the USSR couldn't admit it for a few weeks??? He wouldn't have made a plausible ring opponent for Reagan in the 2 Tribes video by Frankie GtH. 1
Deranged Rhino Posted January 29, 2019 Posted January 29, 2019 3 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Unknown sources say she's at an unknown hospital for unknown reasons. Buzzfeed must be beside themselves with jealousy. 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: Completely agree that this should be viewed with a HUGE grain of salt for those exact reasons. That was quick.
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted January 29, 2019 Posted January 29, 2019 Just now, Foxx said: seems that article from the outlet that first reported her lung cancer may have correct. Just now, Deranged Rhino said: That was quick. $#%#ing RUSSIANS again!! 2
row_33 Posted January 29, 2019 Posted January 29, 2019 glad to hear a media outlet is happy to report their declaration of lung cancer may have been correct
LB3 Posted January 29, 2019 Posted January 29, 2019 I wonder which journo is going to be the first to say, "Trump had her killed!!!!.... ...if true, he should be dealt the harshest penalties there are" 1
Recommended Posts