keepthefaith Posted November 13, 2018 Posted November 13, 2018 49 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: What's most surprising is that this old bat ran for and won another 6-year term. 1
Tiberius Posted November 13, 2018 Posted November 13, 2018 Quote Maryland’s top lawyer asked a federal judge Tuesday to block Matthew G. Whitaker from serving as acting U.S. attorney general contending the appointment is illegal. Maryland Attorney General Brian E. Frosh (D) says President Trump’s appointment of Whitaker to the nation’s highest law enforcement post is unconstitutional and that he should be replaced by Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein, who was confirmed by the Senate. “Few positions are more critical than that of U.S. Attorney General, an office that wields enormous enforcement power and authority over the lives of all Americans,” Frosh said in a statement. Good! https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/maryland-to-challenge-legality-of-whitakers-appointment-as-acting-us-attorney-general/2018/11/13/3356062a-e747-11e8-a939-9469f1166f9d_story.html?utm_term=.8055d787bf17
DC Tom Posted November 13, 2018 Posted November 13, 2018 19 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Good! https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/maryland-to-challenge-legality-of-whitakers-appointment-as-acting-us-attorney-general/2018/11/13/3356062a-e747-11e8-a939-9469f1166f9d_story.html?utm_term=.8055d787bf17 ***** stupid. 1
TakeYouToTasker Posted November 13, 2018 Posted November 13, 2018 4 minutes ago, DC Tom said: ***** stupid. What an incredible waste of taxpayer dollars.
Koko78 Posted November 13, 2018 Posted November 13, 2018 5 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said: What an incredible waste of taxpayer dollars. No cost is too great to charge to others when you're fighting actual literal super mecha-Hitler.
DC Tom Posted November 13, 2018 Posted November 13, 2018 7 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said: What an incredible waste of taxpayer dollars. And they're setting a new precedent to bite them in the ass later on.
Koko78 Posted November 13, 2018 Posted November 13, 2018 4 minutes ago, DC Tom said: And they're setting a new precedent to bite them in the ass later on. Well, by that point it will be completely unfair to infringe on the right of the President to appoint acting officers to fill vacancies!
Nanker Posted November 13, 2018 Posted November 13, 2018 I want Whittaker to hire a new Special Prosecutor to investigate Hillary's crimes. Have at it!
Tiberius Posted November 14, 2018 Posted November 14, 2018 19 hours ago, TakeYouToTasker said: What an incredible waste of taxpayer dollars. Upholding the rule of law is a waste? You Trump cultists are just unAmerican ____ Chuck Schumer: Quote First, we are demanding that Mr. Whitaker recuse himself from the Russia investigation. On Sunday, I sent a letter along with Leader Pelosi, and top Democrats from both houses and the relevant committees, to the Department of Justice’s Chief Ethics Officer explaining why Mr. Whitaker should be recused and requesting the Chief Ethics Officer notify Congress as to what guidance Whitaker has given. We’ve heard that Mr. Whitaker is meeting with Ethics officials this week, and we expect, we expect, that Congress will be notified about the results of those discussions. Second, if Mr. Whitaker does not recuse himself, we Democrats are going to attempt to add legislation to the must-pass spending bill in the lame duck session that will prevent acting Attorney General Whitaker from interfering with the Mueller investigation in any way. 19 hours ago, DC Tom said: And they're setting a new precedent to bite them in the ass later on. By upholding the rule of law? You are a complete idiot. Just shut up, your stupidity knows no bounds
Deranged Rhino Posted November 14, 2018 Posted November 14, 2018 DOJ just released its opinion that it's not illegal or a violation. Sorry, you're incorrect on this. https://mobile.twitter.com/WSJ/status/1062722630539730944 1
DC Tom Posted November 14, 2018 Posted November 14, 2018 14 minutes ago, Tiberius said: By upholding the rule of law? You are a complete idiot. Just shut up, your stupidity knows no bounds I already pointed out where it hasn't been required before...and you responded with an inapplicable Supreme Court decision that you didn't understand. Neither statutory law, nor case law, nor precedent requires an acting position to be Senate confirmed. Period. End of story.
4merper4mer Posted November 14, 2018 Posted November 14, 2018 1 minute ago, DC Tom said: I already pointed out where it hasn't been required before...and you responded with an inapplicable Supreme Court decision that you didn't understand. Neither statutory law, nor case law, nor precedent requires an acting position to be Senate confirmed. Period. End of story. There is precedent. Since he was approximately 4 months old, Chuck Schumer has said whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!! 1,276,354,917 times and every time he got what he wanted.
Tiberius Posted November 14, 2018 Posted November 14, 2018 1 minute ago, DC Tom said: I already pointed out where it hasn't been required before...and you responded with an inapplicable Supreme Court decision that you didn't understand. Neither statutory law, nor case law, nor precedent requires an acting position to be Senate confirmed. Period. End of story. This is so stupid. You will say anything to defend Trump. The best part is that you are making a losing argument. Nothing can be done for corrupt intent, which is the sole and only purpose behind his move, and you know it. Only an idiot like you--and the rest of the cultists--would try and argue this is just fine and "End of story." Stupid! You are stupid. 5 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said: There is precedent. Since he was approximately 4 months old, Chuck Schumer has said whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!! 1,276,354,917 times and every time he got what he wanted. There is no legally sustaining precedent for a corrupt act. Why was AG fired and this clown hired?
boyst Posted November 14, 2018 Posted November 14, 2018 47 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: And since memos supercede all other government issues this is settled.
4merper4mer Posted November 14, 2018 Posted November 14, 2018 2 hours ago, Tiberius said: You are stupid. There is no legally sustaining precedent for a corrupt act. Why was AG fired and this clown hired? Dude I'm with you. Schumer said Waaaaaahhhhhhh. Something simply must be done.
DC Tom Posted November 14, 2018 Posted November 14, 2018 2 hours ago, Tiberius said: This is so stupid. You will say anything to defend Trump. The best part is that you are making a losing argument. Nothing can be done for corrupt intent, which is the sole and only purpose behind his move, and you know it. Only an idiot like you--and the rest of the cultists--would try and argue this is just fine and "End of story." Stupid! You are stupid. There is no legally sustaining precedent for a corrupt act. Why was AG fired and this clown hired? Now it's corrupt? How is that? When did you determine this?
Tiberius Posted November 14, 2018 Posted November 14, 2018 5 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Now it's corrupt? How is that? When did you determine this? It's been corrupt, and you know it. Why did he want Sessions out? Just because?
Foxx Posted November 14, 2018 Posted November 14, 2018 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: It's been corrupt, and you know it. Why did he want Sessions out? Just because? why doesn't really matter. all cabinet positions serve at the commander in chiefs behest.
Recommended Posts