B-Man Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 Matthew Whitaker is loyal to Donald Trump. That’s refreshing, not disqualifying. . 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 12 minutes ago, B-Man said: Matthew Whitaker is loyal to Donald Trump. That’s refreshing, not disqualifying. . Not getting Senate apporval is ok with you? How unAmerican, how you love it when our nation's founding principles to trampled upon. You should be ashamed of yourself. But anything for Trump, right? Pure partisan garbage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 44 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Not getting Senate apporval is ok with you? Why does he need Senate approval to be the Acting Attorney General? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 How many Czars in the last 2 admins we're approved? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 6 minutes ago, Koko78 said: Why does he need Senate approval to be the Acting Attorney General? You know as well as I do why. Playing stupid won't cut it with this corrupt act. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 21 minutes ago, Tiberius said: You know as well as I do why. Playing stupid won't cut it with this corrupt act. Apparently not, as an ACTING officer does not need to be confirmed by the Senate. Never has. It also makes little sense as the position of ACTING [anything] is, almost by definition, temporary. Now, if you're advocating for him to be the permanent successor to Sessions, that's a different subject. I had no idea you were such a fan of Whitaker. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 21 minutes ago, Koko78 said: Why does he need Senate approval to be the Acting Attorney General? He doesn't. Peroid. Full stop. It's a "requirement" that's never existed before being invented now. Ask yourself why that is? Why are people trying ro invalidate an acting AG's appointment on a newly invented Constitutional interpretation based on their fear of interference in an investigation that's almost complete? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 2 hours ago, Tiberius said: Not for corrupt purposes, which this obviously is. He is there to go after the investigation of Trump. Totally corrupt, only Trump Cultists think otherwise. If this clown interferes with the investigation in any way at all, he is going to jail. Who besides Trump's political opposition, the leftist media and their *****/***** lickers thinks that the Mueller investigation shouldn't come to a close? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 7 minutes ago, DC Tom said: He doesn't. Peroid. Full stop. It's a "requirement" that's never existed before being invented now. Ask yourself why that is? Why are people trying ro invalidate an acting AG's appointment on a newly invented Constitutional interpretation based on their fear of interference in an investigation that's almost complete? Eh, I wanted gator to actually answer. Killjoy! However to answer your rhetorical question: So the Democrats can keep the farce going in their nonsensical bid to delegitimize the sitting administration. Whitaker is going to very quickly end the 'investigation', either by forcing Muller to submit his final report immediately, outright firing Mueller, or simply cutting off his funding. Whitaker can take the political heat for either of these options, since he's not likely going to be the choice to be Sessions' successor. This terrifies the Democrats, who are planning on spending the next two years making themselves look stupid with frivolity like the Russia collusion nonsense. Just look at the histrionics by Schumer. He wants to "protect" Mueller by inserting legislation into the next 'must pass' spending bill. Apparently he didn't learn from the last shutdown that he isn't going to win that game against Trump. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 2 minutes ago, Koko78 said: Eh, I wanted gator to actually answer. Killjoy! Yes, but his response to me will be much, much more hilarious. 2 minutes ago, Koko78 said: However to answer your rhetorical question: So the Democrats can keep the farce going in their nonsensical bid to delegitimize the sitting administration. Whitaker is going to very quickly end the 'investigation', either by forcing Muller to submit his final report immediately, outright firing Mueller, or simply cutting off his funding. Whitaker can take the political heat for either of these options, since he's not likely going to be the choice to be Sessions' successor. This terrifies the Democrats, who are planning on spending the next two years making themselves look stupid with frivolity like the Russia collusion nonsense. Just look at the histrionics by Schumer. He wants to "protect" Mueller by inserting legislation into the next 'must pass' spending bill. Apparently he didn't learn from the last shutdown that he isn't going to win that game against Trump. That's one possible explanation. What's another? DR, want to help him out here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 6 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Yes, but his response to me will be much, much more hilarious. Fair enough. 7 minutes ago, DC Tom said: That's one possible explanation. What's another? DR, want to help him out here? Nevermind, I got this: 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 2 minutes ago, Koko78 said: Fair enough. Nevermind, I got this: No...but I like where your head is at. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 10 minutes ago, keepthefaith said: Who besides Trump's political opposition, the leftist media and their *****/***** lickers thinks that the Mueller investigation shouldn't come to a close? People that respect the rule of law. That obviously does not apply to Trump and his cultists 18 minutes ago, DC Tom said: He doesn't. Peroid. Full stop. It's a "requirement" that's never existed before being invented now. Ask yourself why that is? Why are people trying ro invalidate an acting AG's appointment on a newly invented Constitutional interpretation based on their fear of interference in an investigation that's almost complete? Such ignorance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 49 minutes ago, Boyst62 said: That's as bad as that Hillary in the American Flag bathing suit pic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 51 minutes ago, Boyst62 said: I thought you were younger. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 31 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Sessions is a ***** if he doesn't go on TV and say "no thanks, kiss my ass." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 1 hour ago, Koko78 said: Apparently not, as an ACTING officer does not need to be confirmed by the Senate. Never has. It also makes little sense as the position of ACTING [anything] is, almost by definition, temporary. Now, if you're advocating for him to be the permanent successor to Sessions, that's a different subject. I had no idea you were such a fan of Whitaker. Acting for corrupt purposes. Do you really think Trump honestly arrived at installing this clown to oversea Justice? After bashing his previous pick because he did the right thing in recusing himself? If you are ok with this you are OK with anything Trump does whether legal or not. Just admit it, you don't care about the rule of law, you only care about your party, your president and that's it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts