B-Man Posted November 13, 2018 Posted November 13, 2018 Matthew Whitaker is loyal to Donald Trump. That’s refreshing, not disqualifying. . 2 1
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted November 13, 2018 Posted November 13, 2018 On 11/13/2018 at 4:15 PM, B-Man said: Matthew Whitaker is loyal to Donald Trump. That’s refreshing, not disqualifying. . Expand Not getting Senate apporval is ok with you? How unAmerican, how you love it when our nation's founding principles to trampled upon. You should be ashamed of yourself. But anything for Trump, right? Pure partisan garbage.
Koko78 Posted November 13, 2018 Posted November 13, 2018 On 11/13/2018 at 4:29 PM, Tiberius said: Not getting Senate apporval is ok with you? Expand Why does he need Senate approval to be the Acting Attorney General? 2
boyst Posted November 13, 2018 Posted November 13, 2018 How many Czars in the last 2 admins we're approved?
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted November 13, 2018 Posted November 13, 2018 On 11/13/2018 at 5:08 PM, Koko78 said: Why does he need Senate approval to be the Acting Attorney General? Expand You know as well as I do why. Playing stupid won't cut it with this corrupt act.
Koko78 Posted November 13, 2018 Posted November 13, 2018 On 11/13/2018 at 5:16 PM, Tiberius said: You know as well as I do why. Playing stupid won't cut it with this corrupt act. Expand Apparently not, as an ACTING officer does not need to be confirmed by the Senate. Never has. It also makes little sense as the position of ACTING [anything] is, almost by definition, temporary. Now, if you're advocating for him to be the permanent successor to Sessions, that's a different subject. I had no idea you were such a fan of Whitaker. 2
DC Tom Posted November 13, 2018 Posted November 13, 2018 On 11/13/2018 at 5:08 PM, Koko78 said: Why does he need Senate approval to be the Acting Attorney General? Expand He doesn't. Peroid. Full stop. It's a "requirement" that's never existed before being invented now. Ask yourself why that is? Why are people trying ro invalidate an acting AG's appointment on a newly invented Constitutional interpretation based on their fear of interference in an investigation that's almost complete? 3
keepthefaith Posted November 13, 2018 Posted November 13, 2018 On 11/13/2018 at 3:08 PM, Tiberius said: Not for corrupt purposes, which this obviously is. He is there to go after the investigation of Trump. Totally corrupt, only Trump Cultists think otherwise. If this clown interferes with the investigation in any way at all, he is going to jail. Expand Who besides Trump's political opposition, the leftist media and their *****/***** lickers thinks that the Mueller investigation shouldn't come to a close?
Koko78 Posted November 13, 2018 Posted November 13, 2018 On 11/13/2018 at 5:36 PM, DC Tom said: He doesn't. Peroid. Full stop. It's a "requirement" that's never existed before being invented now. Ask yourself why that is? Why are people trying ro invalidate an acting AG's appointment on a newly invented Constitutional interpretation based on their fear of interference in an investigation that's almost complete? Expand Eh, I wanted gator to actually answer. Killjoy! However to answer your rhetorical question: So the Democrats can keep the farce going in their nonsensical bid to delegitimize the sitting administration. Whitaker is going to very quickly end the 'investigation', either by forcing Muller to submit his final report immediately, outright firing Mueller, or simply cutting off his funding. Whitaker can take the political heat for either of these options, since he's not likely going to be the choice to be Sessions' successor. This terrifies the Democrats, who are planning on spending the next two years making themselves look stupid with frivolity like the Russia collusion nonsense. Just look at the histrionics by Schumer. He wants to "protect" Mueller by inserting legislation into the next 'must pass' spending bill. Apparently he didn't learn from the last shutdown that he isn't going to win that game against Trump.
DC Tom Posted November 13, 2018 Posted November 13, 2018 On 11/13/2018 at 5:44 PM, Koko78 said: Eh, I wanted gator to actually answer. Killjoy! Expand Yes, but his response to me will be much, much more hilarious. On 11/13/2018 at 5:44 PM, Koko78 said: However to answer your rhetorical question: So the Democrats can keep the farce going in their nonsensical bid to delegitimize the sitting administration. Whitaker is going to very quickly end the 'investigation', either by forcing Muller to submit his final report immediately, outright firing Mueller, or simply cutting off his funding. Whitaker can take the political heat for either of these options, since he's not likely going to be the choice to be Sessions' successor. This terrifies the Democrats, who are planning on spending the next two years making themselves look stupid with frivolity like the Russia collusion nonsense. Just look at the histrionics by Schumer. He wants to "protect" Mueller by inserting legislation into the next 'must pass' spending bill. Apparently he didn't learn from the last shutdown that he isn't going to win that game against Trump. Expand That's one possible explanation. What's another? DR, want to help him out here?
Koko78 Posted November 13, 2018 Posted November 13, 2018 On 11/13/2018 at 5:48 PM, DC Tom said: Yes, but his response to me will be much, much more hilarious. Expand Fair enough. On 11/13/2018 at 5:48 PM, DC Tom said: That's one possible explanation. What's another? DR, want to help him out here? Expand Nevermind, I got this: 3
DC Tom Posted November 13, 2018 Posted November 13, 2018 On 11/13/2018 at 5:50 PM, Koko78 said: Fair enough. Nevermind, I got this: Expand No...but I like where your head is at. 1
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted November 13, 2018 Posted November 13, 2018 On 11/13/2018 at 5:43 PM, keepthefaith said: Who besides Trump's political opposition, the leftist media and their *****/***** lickers thinks that the Mueller investigation shouldn't come to a close? Expand People that respect the rule of law. That obviously does not apply to Trump and his cultists On 11/13/2018 at 5:36 PM, DC Tom said: He doesn't. Peroid. Full stop. It's a "requirement" that's never existed before being invented now. Ask yourself why that is? Why are people trying ro invalidate an acting AG's appointment on a newly invented Constitutional interpretation based on their fear of interference in an investigation that's almost complete? Expand Such ignorance.
keepthefaith Posted November 13, 2018 Posted November 13, 2018 On 11/13/2018 at 6:02 PM, Boyst62 said: Expand That's as bad as that Hillary in the American Flag bathing suit pic.
3rdnlng Posted November 13, 2018 Posted November 13, 2018 On 11/13/2018 at 6:02 PM, Boyst62 said: Expand I thought you were younger. 1
boyst Posted November 13, 2018 Posted November 13, 2018 On 11/13/2018 at 6:27 PM, Deranged Rhino said: Expand Sessions is a ***** if he doesn't go on TV and say "no thanks, kiss my ass."
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted November 13, 2018 Posted November 13, 2018 On 11/13/2018 at 5:33 PM, Koko78 said: Apparently not, as an ACTING officer does not need to be confirmed by the Senate. Never has. It also makes little sense as the position of ACTING [anything] is, almost by definition, temporary. Now, if you're advocating for him to be the permanent successor to Sessions, that's a different subject. I had no idea you were such a fan of Whitaker. Expand Acting for corrupt purposes. Do you really think Trump honestly arrived at installing this clown to oversea Justice? After bashing his previous pick because he did the right thing in recusing himself? If you are ok with this you are OK with anything Trump does whether legal or not. Just admit it, you don't care about the rule of law, you only care about your party, your president and that's it.
Recommended Posts