LB3 Posted November 7, 2018 Posted November 7, 2018 Just now, BeginnersMind said: Why do you guys love making up strawmen instead of conversing? I'll be waiting for you to back up your despicable accusation that I called him a racist or Nazi. He's just a guy who comes to call people names...60K posts' worth. What value he brings! You're not a serious person. 2
boyst Posted November 7, 2018 Posted November 7, 2018 19 minutes ago, Tiberius said: This is big. All those people arrested for being black will be able to vote from now on You really think you catch a charge by being black? ***** you're a dumbass. Florida has far more important things to worry about than felons voting 3 hours ago, BeginnersMind said: The gerrymandered salamander shaped districts were not insane? Good stuff. The conspiracy echo chamber here thought the Rs would keep their majority in the House despite that huge improbability. But forgive them: They had Hillary for the win as part of the master Bildeberg plan in 2016. No they didn't. You're terribly mistaken. You're a fool, a liar and a joke.
Koko78 Posted November 7, 2018 Posted November 7, 2018 11 minutes ago, BeginnersMind said: Why do you guys love making up strawmen instead of conversing? It's not a strawman argument. It's straight-up mocking. 1 1
boyst Posted November 7, 2018 Posted November 7, 2018 4 minutes ago, BeginnersMind said: Why do you guys love making up strawmen instead of conversing? I'll be waiting for you to back up your despicable accusation that I called him a racist or Nazi. He's just a guy who comes to call people names...60K posts' worth. What value he brings! You know, you would get a lot more people effectively arguing you if you actually brought something to the table. Go to the back of the classroom/bus/playground/whatever is not deemed racist today and play with yourself because it's as much gratitude as you'll get. Maybe Tibs or Gary will come stroke your ego.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted November 7, 2018 Author Posted November 7, 2018 17 minutes ago, BeginnersMind said: 1 person, 1.1 votes. That's gerrymandering. The power of the city and population centers was offset by the Senate and the Electoral College at a national level. Gerrymandering, which benefitted the Rs in PA until recently, is a tool that both sides abuse to preserve power. It's not about reducing the influence of population centers (except when those centers don't vote your way). It encourages division and minimizes the chances for independent and moderate candidates. It's a scourge. redistricting promotes moderation, that's a good one.
boyst Posted November 7, 2018 Posted November 7, 2018 8 minutes ago, joesixpack said: redistricting promotes moderation, that's a good one. No, see the thing is anytime you change any voting lines regardless of pectoral evidence in demographic or population shift its gerrymandering. Because Nazis
Tiberius Posted November 7, 2018 Posted November 7, 2018 9 minutes ago, Boyst62 said: You really think you catch a charge by being black? ***** you're a dumbass. Florida has far more important things to worry about than felons voting No they didn't. You're terribly mistaken. You're a fool, a liar and a joke. Oh ya, racist cops actually do more than simply shoot black people.
boyst Posted November 7, 2018 Posted November 7, 2018 2 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Oh ya, racist cops actually do more than simply shoot black people. Good! Thin out the herd!
Tiberius Posted November 7, 2018 Posted November 7, 2018 Just now, Boyst62 said: Good! Thin out the herd! And lock them up!
BeginnersMind Posted November 7, 2018 Posted November 7, 2018 21 minutes ago, joesixpack said: redistricting promotes moderation, that's a good one. God forbid Democrats and Republicans vote together in a district. The humanity!
IDBillzFan Posted November 7, 2018 Posted November 7, 2018 5 hours ago, Ol Dirty B said: Why are you posting this person's tweets? They're nobody. Everybody's somebody, hombre. Even if you don't think so. 1
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted November 7, 2018 Author Posted November 7, 2018 2 minutes ago, BeginnersMind said: God forbid Democrats and Republicans vote together in a district. The humanity! let me break this down for you in small words, so you can grasp my meaning: When you put people of two disparate beliefs in one space, there will not be a combination of ideas. There will be a domination of one by the other based on population status. That's a basic fact of history, and why redistricting almost ALWAYS favors Democrats, and therefore not moderation, but radicalization.
LB3 Posted November 7, 2018 Posted November 7, 2018 Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump In all fairness, Nancy Pelosi deserves to be chosen Speaker of the House by the Democrats. If they give her a hard time, perhaps we will add some Republican votes. She has earned this great honor! 8:31 AM · Nov 7, 2018 · Twitter for iPhone 7.8K Retweets 34.9K Likes 2
ALF Posted November 7, 2018 Posted November 7, 2018 2 minutes ago, LBSeeBallLBGetBall said: Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump In all fairness, Nancy Pelosi deserves to be chosen Speaker of the House by the Democrats. If they give her a hard time, perhaps we will add some Republican votes. She has earned this great honor! 8:31 AM · Nov 7, 2018 · Twitter Who are you , and what did you do with Trump ? 1
Gavin in Va Beach Posted November 7, 2018 Posted November 7, 2018 (edited) 9 minutes ago, LBSeeBallLBGetBall said: Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump In all fairness, Nancy Pelosi deserves to be chosen Speaker of the House by the Democrats. If they give her a hard time, perhaps we will add some Republican votes. She has earned this great honor! 8:31 AM · Nov 7, 2018 · Twitter for iPhone 7.8K Retweets 34.9K Likes Translation: You idiots voted to let that batshiat crazy biatch back into a leadership role, now you can live with it. Edited November 7, 2018 by Gavin in Va Beach 3 1
boyst Posted November 7, 2018 Posted November 7, 2018 1 minute ago, ALF said: Who are you , and what did you do with Trump ? I wouldn't be surprised if pelosi is one of the calmer heads in the next so many years
BeginnersMind Posted November 7, 2018 Posted November 7, 2018 10 minutes ago, joesixpack said: let me break this down for you in small words, so you can grasp my meaning: When you put people of two disparate beliefs in one space, there will not be a combination of ideas. There will be a domination of one by the other based on population status. That's a basic fact of history, and why redistricting almost ALWAYS favors Democrats, and therefore not moderation, but radicalization. "Redistricting" or gerrymandering lead to the salamander districts that benefitted Rs in PA. Putting voters together and letting them vote together for candidates is called, what's the word, democracy. Gerrymandered districts favor incumbents who can entrench ideologically over a long term and will never work with the other side. This isn't an R or D problem--it's an American one. It just so happened that in PA, it benefitted the Rs for a long time until this year. Gerrymandering is a plague. I can't believe you'd defend it, except that it doesn't work out for you.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted November 7, 2018 Author Posted November 7, 2018 (edited) 2 minutes ago, BeginnersMind said: "Redistricting" or gerrymandering lead to the salamander districts that benefitted Rs in PA. Putting voters together and letting them vote together for candidates is called, what's the word, democracy. Gerrymandered districts favor incumbents who can entrench ideologically over a long term and will never work with the other side. This isn't an R or D problem--it's an American one. It just so happened that in PA, it benefitted the Rs for a long time until this year. Gerrymandering is a plague. I can't believe you'd defend it, except that it doesn't work out for you. it doesn't work out for ANYBODY to silence those in less populous areas for favor of the party that represents the cities. Ever. I mean, look at PA's results. A moderate like Fitzpatrick almost got ousted by a RADICAL loony democrat. Edited November 7, 2018 by joesixpack
B-Man Posted November 7, 2018 Posted November 7, 2018 Quote Tom Bevan ✔@TomBevanRCP So every Dem Senator in a competitive race who voted against Kavanaugh lost (Donnelly, Heitkamp, McCaskill, and almost certainly Nelson), and the one who voted for Kavanaugh survived (Manchin)............ Coincidence? 11:10 PM - Nov 6, 2018
Recommended Posts