Will Peterman score more points for Chicago or Buffalo?

[Estelle Getty]

Serious ?   I am honestly leaning towards Chicago 12 points and 10 for Buffalo.  Anyone else?

[Cygnus99]

Buffalo's defense will only allow 9 points , we have a really good defense but the final score will be something like  44 -3 Bears . The other 33 points will be the scored  by the Bears defense due to all the interceptions by Peterman and a an offense that is beyond awful and dysfunctional  

Edited November 4, 2018 by Cygnus99

[transient]

1 minute ago, Estelle Getty said:

Serious ?   I am honestly leaning towards Chicago 12 points and 10 for Buffalo.  Anyone else?

 

Peterman can’t be directly responsible for 10 points so I feel like this is rigged. FAKE NEWS!! FAKE NEWS!!

[BigDingus]

I'm expecting Anderson to be miraculously cleared in time to play

If not, I expect him to put up more points for the Bills. Unless you're counting any turnovers that lead to points as points he scored for Chicago, I think he'll have more points for us.

[Brianmoorman4jesus]

1 minute ago, BigDingus said:

I'm expecting Anderson to be miraculously cleared in time to play

If not, I expect him to put up more points for the Bills. Unless you're counting any turnovers that lead to points as points he scored for Chicago, I think he'll have more points for us.

He’s out

[BigDingus]

However, Chicago's defense is good at stopping the run, so I expect McDermott & Daboll to start calling more & more pass plays which will inevitably lead to more INT's. 

[Brianmoorman4jesus]

A game plan exists where Peterman can almost not lose us the game. The first drive of the Pats game almost needs to be our entire game tomorrow. If Peterman throws more then 7 passes, I think we lose

Edited November 4, 2018 by Brianmoorman4jesus

[BigDingus]

Just now, Brianmoorman4jesus said:

He’s out

 

Well last I saw he was listed as Questionable, so I guess I missed something today. Oh well, may God have mercy on Peterman's soul.

[LSHMEAB]

4 minutes ago, transient said:

 

Peterman can’t be directly responsible for 10 points so I feel like this is rigged. FAKE NEWS!! FAKE NEWS!!

WRONG!

 

A pick 6 and two safeties would get the job done.

[wppete]

This is an all time low for Buffalo Offense. Disaster.

[Brianmoorman4jesus]

Just when you thought all the scary stuff was put away for Halloween....Peterman is back 

[SlimShady'sSpaceForce]

The Bills

 

 

[Helpmenow]

Da bears

[Augie]

17 minutes ago, LSHMEAB said:

WRONG!

 

A pick 6 and two safeties would get the job done.

 

Awww, you beat me to it.... It’s a possibility, I must admit. 

[Brianmoorman4jesus]

29 minutes ago, LSHMEAB said:

WRONG!

 

A pick 6 and two safeties would get the job done.

He means he can’t be responsible for the bills getting 10

[RobH063]

Watch Peterman have a good game. Throw a couple of TD passes, no Pics and no fumbles. There will be a bunch of Rocket Surgeons with 20 something posts and a Rep number of 257+ that will come on here and say Peterman is the man! He should be the starter for the rest of the year and beyond. Everyone else can be dealt for pics.

[Pine Barrens Mafia]

47 minutes ago, wppete said:

This is an all time low for Buffalo Offense. Disaster.

 

Perhaps you'd feel better with a good scream at the sky.

 

[transient]

1 hour ago, LSHMEAB said:

WRONG!

 

A pick 6 and two safeties would get the job done.

 

Seems like an even bigger nightmare than what we’ve been exposed to already, but I hear ya. Fair enough. 

[Skins Malone]

Lame

[Fadingpain]

A key to the game will be how long Peterman can go without throwing a pick.

 

If he can get some playing time under his belt without a TO, he might build some confidence and have an OK game.

 

If he throws a pick early, it could snowball into an ugly situation IMO.