The Wiz Posted November 3, 2018 Posted November 3, 2018 (edited) 16 minutes ago, Johnny Hammersticks said: A&$ to mouth?? ??? That's how us bills fans usually take it. Also no lube. Edited November 3, 2018 by The Wiz 4
RiotAct Posted November 3, 2018 Posted November 3, 2018 5 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Peterson? What, did the Bills sign another QB in the past fifteen minutes? Would we be surprised if they did? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Peterson
nucci Posted November 3, 2018 Posted November 3, 2018 22 minutes ago, NoHuddleKelly12 said: McD pulling some gamesmanship must be it at this point, trying to gain an edge any way he can get it? Not sure what the NFL rules on this are though I'm sure the Bears are panicking over whether the Bills are starting Peterman or Anderson 4
Wayne Arnold Posted November 3, 2018 Posted November 3, 2018 12 minutes ago, PittsforDave said: What other option do we have? Playing Nate guarantees a lose. Derek is really our only real option atm. With Derek Anderson, Buffalo's offense averages 4.5 points per game (thanks to our kicker). I could go on but I'm pretty sure that stat alone hammers it home, right?
26CornerBlitz Posted November 3, 2018 Author Posted November 3, 2018 Just now, nucci said: I'm sure the Bears are panicking over whether the Bills are starting Peterman or Anderson Khalil Mack might not play because of the high level challenge.
Romie Posted November 3, 2018 Posted November 3, 2018 Please let Peterman finish the season, and lock down that #1 pick
PetermansRedemption Posted November 3, 2018 Posted November 3, 2018 It honestly does not matter at all. Peterman is trash, Anderson is trash. It matters little. At least Peterman has a TD pass to go with all those turnovers. Anderson just has the turnovers. They are both probably the worst two QB’s currently on any NFL roster. If Peterman gives you a 1% chance of winning Anderson probably gives you a 1.05% chance. He doesn’t move the needle much. 2
starrymessenger Posted November 3, 2018 Posted November 3, 2018 I have no interest in seeing Anderson vs the Bears. I don't think he should be playing, healthy or not - and I don't think he will play Sunday. His role should be like JMc in NY, mentoring the rook. He can't do that if he's playing.
Low Positive Posted November 3, 2018 Posted November 3, 2018 2 minutes ago, Romie said: Please let Peterman finish the season, and lock down that #1 pick We still wouldn’t get it because the Raiders have completely quit on Gruden. They won’t win another game. Say what you will about McD, but his players play hard for him. I expect this defense to win at least another 2 games for us. 2
NoHuddleKelly12 Posted November 3, 2018 Posted November 3, 2018 28 minutes ago, nucci said: I'm sure the Bears are panicking over whether the Bills are starting Peterman or Anderson Didn’t say it would be any kind of a material edge, that’s for sure!
KD in CA Posted November 3, 2018 Posted November 3, 2018 30 minutes ago, RiotAct said: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Peterson I’m going right past Scott & friends as I type. I don’t see him in the yard.
Brianmoorman4jesus Posted November 3, 2018 Posted November 3, 2018 If Peterman has to start, I would make sure Daboll calls less then 10 pass plays all game and I am all but telling Nate, if you don’t see it completely safe, do not throw it. I would not let this guy sink us again. I’d also have Barkley ready to go in as soon as the second interception happens. It’s not really a matter of if, it’s more of a matter when. I’d have as many creative ways to run the ball as humanly possible and not let Peterman throw another game away.
26CornerBlitz Posted November 3, 2018 Author Posted November 3, 2018 2 minutes ago, Brianmoorman4jesus said: If Peterman has to start, I would make sure Daboll calls less then 10 pass plays all game and I am all but telling Nate, if you don’t see it completely safe, do not throw it. I would not let this guy sink us again. I’d also have Barkley ready to go in as soon as the second interception happens. It’s not really a matter of if, it’s more of a matter when. I’d have as many creative ways to run the ball as humanly possible and not let Peterman throw another game away. The only problem with that strategy is that it plays directly into the strength of the Bears' D.
Kevin1778 Posted November 3, 2018 Posted November 3, 2018 (edited) 1 hour ago, PittsforDave said: Playing Nate is surrendering, which is the same as conceding. At least Derrick gives us a slight possibility of a win. Yes. A guy coming off a concussion with no practice, who has 6 Turnovers and no Touchdowns in 2 games, both against two of the worst defenses in the NFL, gives me a ton of confidence. They were blown out 37-5 and 25-6 under Anderson. Edited November 3, 2018 by Kevin1778
Brianmoorman4jesus Posted November 3, 2018 Posted November 3, 2018 14 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said: The only problem with that strategy is that it plays directly into the strength of the Bears' D. I don’t even care. I might take my chances with 45 runs and hope our Defense plays lights out. Rather then let Peterman throw enough picks to put us out of reach by halftime
26CornerBlitz Posted November 3, 2018 Author Posted November 3, 2018 5 minutes ago, Brianmoorman4jesus said: I don’t even care. I might take my chances with 45 runs and hope our Defense plays lights out. Rather then let Peterman throw enough picks to put us out of reach by halftime Punts >> INTs
eSJayDee Posted November 3, 2018 Posted November 3, 2018 I think the only reason he hasn't been declared out is he's probably a better option to serve as the backup. The Bills presumably think Anderson is a better option than Barkley (they were both on the street when they selected Anderson) and Anderson has 8 practices or whatever relative to Barkley's 2. 1
LSHMEAB Posted November 3, 2018 Posted November 3, 2018 53 minutes ago, ScottLaw said: Peterson>Peterman Pederson>Peterson>Peterman
26CornerBlitz Posted November 3, 2018 Author Posted November 3, 2018 Just now, eSJayDee said: I think the only reason he hasn't been declared out is he's probably a better option to serve as the backup. The Bills presumably think Anderson is a better option than Barkley (they were both on the street when they selected Anderson) and Anderson has 8 practices or whatever relative to Barkley's 2. So if he's cleared maybe they cut Barkley.
Scott7975 Posted November 3, 2018 Posted November 3, 2018 16 minutes ago, Kevin1778 said: Yes. A guy coming off a concussion with no practice, who has 6 Turnovers and no Touchdowns in 2 games, both against two of the worst defenses in the NFL, gives me a ton of confidence. They were blown out 37-5 and 25-6 under Anderson. Last time Pickerman started a game it was 40-0 by the time he was pulled in the third quarter. The chargers game last season when he was pulled the score was 37-7 at halftime.
Recommended Posts