Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
19 minutes ago, longtimebillsfan said:

It should have been over after two weeks ago when he gave up the game to the Colts. 

 

All we can do is be huge Peterman fans on Sunday,  then hold the door after the game and wish nate all the best in his new business career selling Amway.  Once all our qb 's are back, there is no reason to keep Nate Pick 6, Peterman. 

 

First, he didn't play against the Colts. It was Derek Anderson who had 4 turnovers and no touchdowns in a 37-5 loss.

 

Second, when Peterman did start against the Colts in 2017, the Bills won and he was 5 of 10 for 57 yards with a TD and no interceptions. Yes, the Bills have won when Peterman started. In fact they are 1-0 at home when he starts.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Kevin1778 said:

 

First, he didn't play against the Colts. It was Derek Anderson who had 4 turnovers and no touchdowns in a 37-5 loss.

 

Second, when Peterman did start against the Colts in 2017, the Bills won and he was 5 of 10 for 57 yards with a TD and no interceptions. Yes, the Bills have won when Peterman started. In fact they are 1-0 at home when he starts.

You are right.  It is the Nate Peterman era.  He will lead us to where we want to go.

 

I didn't say he started against the Colts, but he finished the game in more ways than one.   

 

If you are a Peterman. Great.  But why are you so angry?

Posted

Peterman shines in this game.  250+ 2TDs+ 1 INT at most.  I'm calling a win here.  He has shown flashes, this week he puts it together. 

Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, longtimebillsfan said:

You are right.  It is the Nate Peterman era.  He will lead us to where we want to go.

 

I didn't say he started against the Colts, but he finished the game in more ways than one.   

 

If you are a Peterman. Great.  But why are you so angry?

 

Again, he didn't play against the Colts. Are you talking about the Texans where he threw a TD and 2 picks after he came in and played behind a line that got Allen knocked out after he threw zero touchdowns?

 

And I am not angry, I just am annoyed Bill's fans listen to these idiot national reporters that act like the Bill's line and receivers are not an issue and it is all Peterman. They lost the last two games and our QB turned the ball over SIX times with a pick 6 and had no touchdowns. His name wasn't Peterman.

Edited by Kevin1778
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Kevin1778 said:

 

Again, he didn't play against the Colts. Are you talking about the Texans where he threw a TD and 2 picks after he came in and played behind a line that got Allen knocked out after he threw zero touchdowns?

 

And I am not angry, I just am annoyed Bill's fans listen to these idiot national reporters that act like the Bill's line and receivers are not an issue and it is all Peterman. They lost the last two games and our QB turned the ball over SIX times with a pick 6 and had no touchdowns. His name wasn't Peterman.

Peterman has earned his reputation.   Most if not all of his picks we throwing errors, not balls going off the receivers hands.  We have seen bad quarterback play this year.  Nate leads the pack in that category. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Brianmoorman4jesus said:

If the Bills are really going to start this ***** again. They should be mandated less then 10 pass attempts regardless of score. I’d be handing off on 3rd and 8

 

Then "fans" would be calling for Dabolls head on a platter.

Posted

He's thrown a few nfl td's, his toss to Zay was perfect.   

 

He's a half the field thrower, they need to roll him out if he's gonna throw to that side.  Keep him in the pocket if he's going down the seams, and for god's sake no throws in the flat unless it's a pump fake to get the corner to think they're gonna get an easy one (why wouldn't they?)

 

Funny I had this game as the one we'd be starting Josh after riding the bench for the first half of the season and learning the pro game.   If only our GM could have done better in securing a vet to start the season.

Posted
1 hour ago, TheTruthHurts said:

Why do you care so much about that? I don't want him worrying about turnovers. As soon as that happens might as well cut him. Obviously he can't keep making the same mistakes but he hasn't played enough to learn from mistakes. 

 

Let him play the rest of the season like we planned. Let him learn. What do you want, Derek Anderson? Please. 

 

 

When you toss an INT every 8 pass attempts you simply aren't afforded whatever amount of time it takes to learn.  Its not fair to the other 52 players on the roster who risk their health while Peterman learns which color unis we are wearing week in week out.

Posted
1 hour ago, quinnearlysghost88 said:

[peterman throws 4 INTs and is sacked 7 times vs the Bears]

 

peterman apologists: I still want to see him finish out the season. He’s due for a big game and he keeps playing hard defenses and aw shucks he’s such a nice guy. Just needs a redemption game. 

He’d never stay on the field after the first 2, so he’s either going to play significantly better and there will be a lot of “crow” for dinner on these boards after, or he’ll be out before halftime and we get our first forgettable look at Barkley. 

Posted
23 minutes ago, ScottLaw said:

Lmao.

 

So when he actually starts worrying about TOs is when we should cut him? 

 

What world are you living in? 

The world where DA has shown that for this season there’s simply not much better to replace NP with in the backup ranks. I have to hold my breath every time DA takes a step that he doesn’t snap a leg and his TD to turnover differential would make even NP shrug. None of that is DA’s fault given the circumstances, but to think that we are about to witness some sort of significant drop off from our QB play with NP this week would be shortsighted IMHO.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

I want nothing more than him to succeed. I can’t help it. He just seems like a really good dude.

 

Come on Nate! Calm down and relax. Have fun on Sunday.

 

WHY DO I STILL BELIEVE IN HIM!!??

  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...