ALF Posted October 31, 2018 Posted October 31, 2018 Matt Barkley 8 td 18 int tanks a lot. Beane is not being subtle about it this season ?
quinnearlysghost88 Posted October 31, 2018 Posted October 31, 2018 Imagine it's Sept. 1 and you get to read a tweet from the future, and this is it. 2
PromoTheRobot Posted October 31, 2018 Posted October 31, 2018 39 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said: Awesome! Now I can update my Tyrod jersey!
Maine-iac Posted October 31, 2018 Posted October 31, 2018 28 minutes ago, PIZ said: Stats while at Chicago: Season Team Passing G GS Comp Att Pct Yds Avg TD Int Sck SckY Rate 2016 Chicago Bears 7 6 129 216 59.7 1,611 7.5 8 14 6 43 68.3 It would appear that like Peterman he throws a VERY catchable ball. Someone else said it and I think it's hard to argue, why wouldn't you sign Kaepernick? He's 100 times better than anyone we are currently trotting out there. Probably could actually offer a lot more knowledge than Barkley in terms of helping Allen. Doesn't hurt that he's mobile either.
BarleyNY Posted October 31, 2018 Posted October 31, 2018 41 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said: Thank god I don’t have to replace my old Schmidt jersey
quinnearlysghost88 Posted October 31, 2018 Posted October 31, 2018 1 minute ago, Maine-iac said: It would appear that like Peterman he throws a VERY catchable ball. Someone else said it and I think it's hard to argue, why wouldn't you sign Kaepernick? He's 100 times better than anyone we are currently trotting out there. Probably could actually offer a lot more knowledge than Barkley in terms of helping Allen. Doesn't hurt that he's mobile either. I think the Bills want to avoid the publicity that comes with the team that finally signs Kap. Also, WNY is bright red. There are a lot of fans that would have a problem with it. They're not going to rock the boat with the red necks.
Kelly the Dog Posted October 31, 2018 Posted October 31, 2018 Just now, Maine-iac said: It would appear that like Peterman he throws a VERY catchable ball. Someone else said it and I think it's hard to argue, why wouldn't you sign Kaepernick? He's 100 times better than anyone we are currently trotting out there. Probably could actually offer a lot more knowledge than Barkley in terms of helping Allen. Doesn't hurt that he's mobile either. The shitshow surrounding signing Kaepernick would be much more fun, interesting and better chance of winning than this shitshow. 1
YoloinOhio Posted October 31, 2018 Author Posted October 31, 2018 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Maine-iac said: It would appear that like Peterman he throws a VERY catchable ball. Someone else said it and I think it's hard to argue, why wouldn't you sign Kaepernick? He's 100 times better than anyone we are currently trotting out there. Probably could actually offer a lot more knowledge than Barkley in terms of helping Allen. Doesn't hurt that he's mobile either. I think it’s also because these guys are just placeholders while the others are nursing week to week injuries. They would like to probably just have Allen and DA on the 53. It’s a lot to take on with Kaep for a couple/3 weeks. Then they would need to cut him and it would be an even bigger deal. Edited October 31, 2018 by YoloinOhio
Maine-iac Posted October 31, 2018 Posted October 31, 2018 So essentially McCoy, convicted of nothing I get it, can have a different lawsuit every season and he can't be traded but bringing in Kaepernick would be too much? I'm not dismissing what each of you are saying. You are all right. I'm not entirely sure the organization really wants to win that badly. They certainly wouldn't want to start winning with Kaepernick. Not that he could make us winners anyways. All that said I think DA should offer at least some kind of help tutoring Allen but I'm still afraid Allen is going to need more than what he's getting if he's going to be the next breakout Mahommes.
Kelly the Dog Posted October 31, 2018 Posted October 31, 2018 2 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said: I think it’s also because these guys are just placeholders while the others are nursing week to week injuries. They would like to probably just have Allen and DA on the 53. It’s a lot to take on with Kaep for a couple/3 weeks. Then they would need to cut him and it would be an even bigger deal. No. When Allen comes back they release Nate. And if they want to sign him to the PS after seeing him totally fail five times in a row they can.
YoloinOhio Posted October 31, 2018 Author Posted October 31, 2018 Just now, Kelly the Dog said: No. When Allen comes back they release Nate. And if they want to sign him to the PS after seeing him totally fail five times in a row they can. Right, but they will also release Barkley when Anderson is cleared. Either way they only want Allen and Anderson imo. Anyone they are signing now at the Qb position is a temporary placeholder to get through week to week injuries.
Jauronimo Posted October 31, 2018 Posted October 31, 2018 I think its a silver lining. Best to let the rookie punter sit and learn for a year as originally planned. He doesn't have the talent around him or adequate protection to succeed this year. 2 4 1
Maine-iac Posted October 31, 2018 Posted October 31, 2018 2 minutes ago, Jauronimo said: I think its a silver lining. Best to let the rookie punter sit and learn for a year as originally planned. He doesn't have the talent around him or adequate protection to succeed this year. He also can't throw. 1
Kelly the Dog Posted October 31, 2018 Posted October 31, 2018 4 minutes ago, Jauronimo said: I think its a silver lining. Best to let the rookie punter sit and learn for a year as originally planned. He doesn't have the talent around him or adequate protection to succeed this year. He cannot grow catching bad snaps from a juggs machine or forgetting fake punts that aren't supposed to be fakes in practice, he needs to screw up in real games. 2
nero1 Posted October 31, 2018 Posted October 31, 2018 For those clamoring for Kaepernick, I believe he has been offered contracts to play and has refused them because he only wants to be the starter and doesn't think the dollars are enough. It would probably hurt his case against the NFL if he signed a contract now. I am not an ESPN analyst so this only conjecture. On other item, He hasn't played in at least two years, so I don't know if would be anymore effective than what we already have.
Irv Posted October 31, 2018 Posted October 31, 2018 23 minutes ago, 4_kidd_4 said: What happened to Bojorquez? He tried to spell his own name. Now has crossed-eyes and needs to be institutionalized. 2
dave mcbride Posted October 31, 2018 Posted October 31, 2018 58 minutes ago, Wo-Bah said: So, is Barkley backing up Peterman? There's a line I never thought I'd type... Wow. We're pretty bad. For now. For now. 13 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said: Right, but they will also release Barkley when Anderson is cleared. Either way they only want Allen and Anderson imo. Anyone they are signing now at the Qb position is a temporary placeholder to get through week to week injuries. You're assuming Peterman won't piss away the job to Barkley!
yungmack Posted October 31, 2018 Posted October 31, 2018 It says something and not something good, that an unemployed bust like Barkley is an actual upgrade over every other QB on the roster. Oh my hip-hopping Christ. 1
Warcodered Posted October 31, 2018 Posted October 31, 2018 (edited) 1 hour ago, Wo-Bah said: So, is Barkley backing up Peterman? There's a line I never thought I'd type... Wow. We're pretty bad. Till either Barkley learns the offense or one of the other QBs recovers. Though I wouldn't eliminate the possibility of him replacing Peterman after another spectacular half. Edited October 31, 2018 by Warcodered
Recommended Posts