Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Commonsense said:

That Todd Gurley guy and a 3rd sounds about right. 

 

Let's not get robbed here. Throw in Robert Woods (who should never have left) and you have a deal. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, MAJBobby said:

 

Well it is the Athletic and they are reliable. 

 

Brian Cummings (@B_inShortsville)
Rams beat reporter for The Athletic; ⁦‪@VinnyBonsignore‬⁩, says Rams have interest in #Bills edge rusher Jerry Hughes. Rams would have to restructure a contract/make a corresponding move to fit Hughes under their cap. theathletic.com/621113/2018/10…

All set with corners dont want Robey-Coleman back!

Posted
5 minutes ago, MAJBobby said:

Rams interested in Hughes

 

BBN (@buffbillsnews)
The LA #Rams have interest in DE Jerry Hughes. LA would need to restructure his contract, or send a player back to make it work. According to The Athletic.

I hate this idea. He could have 3 to 5 more years in him and is playing at the top of his game (and i do get the idea of trading him at high value at 30, but still don't like this). The defense is the functioning unit right now. I also hate the idea of improving a team that is 8-0 and has few real fans.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Commonsense said:

That Todd Gurley guy and a 3rd sounds about right. 

No, he makes too  much money for a RB....they're a dime a dozen...or so I'm told

Posted
3 minutes ago, boco357 said:

All set with corners dont want Robey-Coleman back!

 

Not sure about "all set" but I like Johnson in the slot and Robey-changemynameandnumberandconfusepeople-Coleman is a slot guy. I hated losing him at the time though. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, whatdrought said:

 

I actually wondered about this earlier. I wonder who they have that might be worth anything to us at this point? Any extra linemen?

Thanks! - Is that source worth anything? 

I would only do it for Aaron Kromer

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, nucci said:

Doesn't make sense to trade Hughes

 

He's pretty well paid and hot and cold a lot. Would make sense to get some value going into an unprecedented deep draft for DE. 

Edited by whatdrought
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Woodman19 said:

It does if you think we aren't contenders now but the new assets could be when we are.

So, we continue to weaken the team....now you have to replace one of your best defensive players....when do you plan on being a contender....

2 minutes ago, whatdrought said:

 

He's pretty well paid and hot and cold a lot. Would make sense to get some value going into an unprecedented draft for DE. 

I kinda get that but it doesn't improve the team...we just have to replace another player....you can't replace so many players at one time

Edited by nucci
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, thurst44 said:

I hate this idea. He could have 3 to 5 more years in him and is playing at the top of his game (and i do get the idea of trading him at high value at 30, but still don't like this). The defense is the functioning unit right now. I also hate the idea of improving a team that is 8-0 and has few real fans.

Not to mention that this trade would blow another freaking hole in the roster where there isn't one now.

  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...