Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, longtimebillsfan said:

Even if we start Nate, we still need a viable backup.  so who would that be?

Now you've got the order right!

 

Paxton Lynch anyone?

Posted
3 hours ago, fansince88 said:

What is your suggestion?  

Well, now that it's been revealed that Anderson is likely unavailable, there is no other option.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
7 hours ago, greeneblitz said:

If Peterman's on the roster, he should be starting when Allen's out anyway, either cut him or get him play time to get better, stop wasting time on Derek Anderson.

This is true. If the season is toast and Allen is hurt he could still become a serviceable backup. Confidence can be shaken and it can also be regained, read some of Adam Vinatieri’s career, he got close to being cut and now will finish with a probably insurmountable pinnacle.

3 hours ago, LittleJoeCartwright said:

 

Paxton Lynch anyone?

I suggested this earlier or yesterday, it’s a gamble.

 

I mean at this point who really cares? TO says he wants to play sign him to a veterans minimum worst case he retires, good chance he is still better then Kelvin Benjamin.

Posted
10 hours ago, BillsRdue said:

Has any other team had more that 2 QB's beat to sh^t and not playing? Says something about our OL. Yikes. Everything came off the rails quickly in Buffalo this year. 

I'm sure it has happened at one time or another 

 

if what I just read is true

 

Tony Dungy had to play quarterback his rookie year for the Steelers after their 2 guys went down.

When an NFL team turned to a running back to play quarterback

https://www.foxsports.com/nfl/story/when-an-nfl-team-turned-to-a-running-back-to-play-quarterback-122413

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
21 hours ago, billsfan11 said:

I think it is just of respect to the other 52 guys on the roster. 

 

They owe it to the players on the team to start the best QB available and Nate Peterman is just not that guy. He should not be on a NFL roster

 

Enjoy the ride

 

Posted
On 10/30/2018 at 7:15 AM, buffaloboyinATL said:

They brought him here to teach Allen how to come back from injuries after your blockers nearly get you killed.

Wow... Is this team a train wreck!

 

I am actually thinking of buying Season's next year!

 

That's the VERY definition of dedication! Or is that: insanity?

 

 ?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, ExiledInIllinois said:

Wow... Is this team a train wreck!

 

I am actually thinking of buying Season's next year!

 

That's the VERY definition of dedication! Or is that: insanity?

 

 ?

with you?  the latter  ;)  :D 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

 

 

I don’t think there’s much of a question that he’s not starting vs Bears. My question is either he will be active or barkley will be active as backup. That will be determined in the next couple days as to whether we he’s cleared. Doesn’t look likely. 

Posted
1 hour ago, YoloinOhio said:

 

 

I don’t think there’s much of a question that he’s not starting vs Bears. My question is either he will be active or barkley will be active as backup. That will be determined in the next couple days as to whether we he’s cleared. Doesn’t look likely. 

he's not playing...   

 

 

(was it really a concussion?)

:devil: :devil:

Posted
1 minute ago, ShadyBillsFan said:

he's not playing...   

 

 

(was it really a concussion?)

:devil: :devil:

He will never play for the Bills again. Just my guess. He looked pissed he was out there last week and spent half the game yelling at himself or others. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, ShadyBillsFan said:

I had turned the TV off after the turned the other way on the 80 yard pick 6 so I didn't even know he got hurt.  

 

 

 

There was a big goon leading the parade to the EZ, it wasn't worth his while to get through him.

 

 

Posted

If I was him I would probably say I have a headache every day until Allen is back. There is no way I would want to play against the Bears and Jags with this oline.

×
×
  • Create New...