Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, Kevin1778 said:

 

Agreed. Give him 2 games back to back before the bye. 

Yeah if Derek is out and JA still hurt, might as well sign Kaepernick to back up Peterman. Hate to say it, Peterman has more talent in his pinky toe than Kaepernick, this will be the next Joe Webb package IMHO

3 minutes ago, Dr.Sack said:

Colin Kaepernick would make this offense a little bit more exciting by extending plays with his legs & executing the RPO. That said I get the feeling that tank mode is in full effect. How the hell did we win in Minnesota & beat Tennessee? This team is horrible on offense.

Nah man Peterman is clearly better. Why else would he be in the NFL? ^

Posted
14 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

Exactly why Peterman should start for a now 2-6 football team that would now, at worst, need to go 7-1 in order to make the playoffs.

I see your point but I would prefer to give Allen the experience. Playoffs are out of the question with this ball club. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, suorangefan4 said:

 

Didn't Anderson just throw a pick-6 to the other team tonight? He also had a second one that should've been a pick-6 but they dropped it.

 

Last week against the Colts he threw 3 INTs last week too and had a 4th INT that should've been a pick-6 dropped also.

 

And he's a vet. Peterman is young.

yes a pick 6 for an 85 yard return........this thread is just plain funny.......I guess we're all debating who is the worse QB by the interception record.....

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, suorangefan4 said:

 

Didn't Anderson just throw one to the other team today? He also had a second one that should've been a pick-6 but they dropped it.

 

Last week against the Colts he threw 3 INTs last week too and had a 4th INT that should've been a pick-6 dropped also.

WTH is should have??? You're assuming all NP pick 6's were INT's!

 

Here's a should have for you, NP should have been cut (PS maybe) and another QB could have been the 3rd stringer...NP is who we thought he is, and we let him off the hook!

 

Edited by pimp on da' net
Posted

We could trade Peterman for a 3rd. I know it's a huge loss but let's face it. We're in a rebuild folks and we can't let Peterman gunsling his way to any wins.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, JPP said:

Ive unfortunately watched all the games......he sucks,,,,,pay attention!!  Here it is.....it dont matter because not only our QBs are pure garbage on this team with no redeeming qualities whatsoever......the cast around our QB's are even worse hence why our offense cannot do anything.......we stopped scoring td's......the playcalling is atrocious.....the only somewhat of a bright spot is Chris Ivory.....dear lord.....i cant believe im even commenting on the possible emergance of a QB named Derek Anderson......he wont even make it to the end of season.....guy is going back to golfing (if he can still walk)

 

... and yet... if you're legitimately paying attention... he's still better than Peterman :flirt:

Edited by transplantbillsfan
Posted

How about for the sake of not trotting some has-been, useless player that has NO CHANCE of ever playing for this team again. Anyone who wanted Anderson to start is beyond blind, such a joke. At least Peterman has a chance to play again OR give you the top pick. But no, let's start a guy who can't even throw ONE TD in 2 weeks!!!

Posted
Just now, Dr.Sack said:

The more I think about it the more I realize the job is Peterman’s to lose. He’s the guy to finish the last 8 games.

 

Flash back! He did that in week one.  :blink:

Posted
8 minutes ago, CDogg20 said:

I see your point but I would prefer to give Allen the experience. Playoffs are out of the question with this ball club. 

 

Agreed completely on Allen, but it sounds like the injury is worse than initially thought.

 

Put Allen in if he doesn't risk making his injury worse. Otherwise, Pick-Six-Peterman!!!

Posted
18 minutes ago, suorangefan4 said:

 

Didn't Anderson just throw a pick-6 to the other team tonight? He also had a second one that should've been a pick-6 but they dropped it.

 

Last week against the Colts he threw 3 INTs last week too and had a 4th INT that should've been a pick-6 dropped also.

 

And he's a vet. Peterman is young.

They both suck. This season is a wash, so get your top 3 pick. Play either,  it really doesn't matter. Allen is not learning squat from Nate or Derek. If this organization has any brain cells left they'll go after Herbert and let Justin and Josh fight it out. Peterman and Anderson will only be Bills for 8 more games.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

Agreed completely on Allen, but it sounds like the injury is worse than initially thought.

 

Put Allen in if he doesn't risk making his injury worse. Otherwise, Pick-Six-Peterman!!!

100% agree. I’m in on Allen for the future. Don’t mess that rocket arm up, give it time to heal. If he’s not healthy, at 2-6, you go full on with the tank. I always believed McBeans plan was to have the 2nd year of the regime to be a down year anyways

Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, LABILLBACKER said:

They both suck. This season is a wash, so get your top 3 pick. Play either,  it really doesn't matter. Allen is not learning squat from Nate or Derek. If this organization has any brain cells left they'll go after Herbert and let Justin and Josh fight it out. Peterman and Anderson will only be Bills for 8 more games.

 

Peterman is young. Came into the league with a bad offensive line, bad receivers, mediocre offensive scheme.

 

I still don't buy that he sucks. He has good mechanics and is accurate. He just needs to not telegraph when he's going to throw the out patterns.

 

He also lit up Clemson in college. Sucky QBs don't do that.

Edited by suorangefan4
Posted
29 minutes ago, JPP said:

yes a pick 6 for an 85 yard return........this thread is just plain funny.......I guess we're all debating who is the worse QB by the interception record.....

 

Anderson is bad.

 

Peterman is the worst starting QB in NFL history.

 

Start Peterman.

 

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Perry Turtle said:

Tanking for the top pick when you're not targeting a QB is just a giant FU to the fans who continue to pay top dollar to watch total incompetence. 

 

Seriously, how will the #1 pick in the draft help this pathetic offense.  It's like trying to fix a sink hole with an tube of toothpaste.

Take the top pick and trade it for more pics in the draft.

I'd draft 5 olineman and from there wide receivers. I wouldn't touch defense until oline and wr issues are addressed.

Edited by Bfanlc
Posted
3 hours ago, transplantbillsfan said:

If Allen is out til after the bye and perhaps the whole season and we're really looking to the future...

 

start Peterman.

 

Anderson might not have the stats, but if you're watching him, we will absolutely win 6 or 7 games this season even after this Patriots loss. Our defense is soooooo damn good and Anderson looks like he's starting to get a little more comfortable... yes, I know what his stats are.

 

So, let's make everyone happy... the Peterman guys... the tank guys....

 

well... I guess not the "win now" guys-- I was one of those.

 

But... can't please everyone.

 

Start Peterman!!!

 

I don't think you can start him, this would definitely cause a rift in the locker imo. 

×
×
  • Create New...