Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 10/24/2018 at 4:56 PM, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Put into context what Peace pointed out earlier. The first bomb, which was real and contained explosive material from the reports, was hand delivered to Soros. Who could do that? There are cameras all over the property, the only person who could get close enough to hand deliver it - without drawing suspicion - would be someone who was supposed to work there. So you hand deliver the first one, the real one, knowing it won't go off. 

 

Then you send duds/fake ones through the mail (because you can't risk them going off before they're delivered) to hit all at the same time, but ultimately aren't "real" or capable of going off. 

 

That's riffing off the top of my head. 

Expand  

  Easier said than done in your scenario to Soros.  A bomber would have to know how to get a package labeled to get it from Soros' assistant to Soros himself.  What are the odds of a bomber guessing correctly on that?  Doubtful that the Soros assistant would be in on that as that person now goes under the microscope of scrutiny.  Again, I would point out that the security likely found at these places would not allow a stranger to walk up to a mail box or gate.  

Posted
  On 10/24/2018 at 5:02 PM, DC Tom said:

 

Not enough data; I could invent multiple patterns to fit this.  

Expand  

 

Enough questions about this - How did all the packages with the right addresses AND the package that was returned because of a wrong address all show up on the same day?

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
  On 10/24/2018 at 5:02 PM, peace out said:

(Early) Reports from NBC are the package(s) (not sure what one or ones) found today contain working explosives.

Expand  

  Maybe I have been watching too much television but it seems unlikely a lab report would have been put together so quickly never mind released to a lone news outlet as opposed to having a general press conference.

Posted
  On 10/24/2018 at 4:53 PM, RochesterRob said:

  Except for that not one bomb has worked.  If this was a group effort and they were serious about doing harm then they put the wrong person in charge of making the bombs.  These bombs were never intended to work.  Why?

Expand  

 

Presumption that because they didn't work, they weren't intended to work.  There's no basis for establishing intent from failure.

Posted
  On 10/24/2018 at 5:05 PM, GG said:

 

Enough questions about this - How did all the packages with the right addresses AND the package that was returned because of a wrong address all show up on the same day?

Expand  

To be fair, they could have been sitting around some mailroom and once the alarm went out people started looking (shrugs)

Posted

Possibilities:

 

1. Conservative jerk who embraces violence

2. Apolitical nut

3. Leftist trying to impugn conservatives and help Dems change the subject away from caravans and leftist violence.

 

The elite will tell you we can't even whisper about #2 or 3.

 

 

 

Conservatives are and remain unequivocally and totally against this bombing garbage whether it is a leftist, a nut or a conservative who decided to abandon our values and commit a crime.

 

Jail him.

 

Don't let leftists lie about you when you refuse to accept their narrative.

 

 

 

Remember.........apparently after two years of episodes of liberal violence, everyone on the right has agreed to be violent two weeks before an election.

 

 

It is a nut or a political plan............one or the other.

 

 

.

Posted
  On 10/24/2018 at 5:02 PM, RochesterRob said:

  Easier said than done in your scenario to Soros.  A bomber would have to know how to get a package labeled to get it from Soros' assistant to Soros himself.  What are the odds of a bomber guessing correctly on that?  Doubtful that the Soros assistant would be in on that as that person now goes under the microscope of scrutiny.  Again, I would point out that the security likely found at these places would not allow a stranger to walk up to a mail box or gate.  

Expand  

 

For clarity - I was just riffing... and continue to do only that. But in my scenario Soros would be in on it. That's how it could be hand delivered yet they don't have an arrest or suspect. That's wild speculation based on a limited fact pattern, not meant to be conclusive. 

  On 10/24/2018 at 5:07 PM, Bray Wyatt said:

Just got an update on my phone, said package sent to CNN had some kind of a white powder to it

Expand  

 

They confirmed it at the press conference. 

Posted
  On 10/24/2018 at 5:08 PM, Deranged Rhino said:

 

For clarity - I was just riffing... and continue to do only that. But in my scenario Soros would be in on it. That's how it could be hand delivered yet they don't have an arrest or suspect. That's wild speculation based on a limited fact pattern, not meant to be conclusive. 

 

They confirmed it at the press conference. 

Expand  

 

Must be killing CNN to report on something other than "Orange Man Bad."
 

Posted
  On 10/24/2018 at 5:05 PM, GG said:

 

Enough questions about this - How did all the packages with the right addresses AND the package that was returned because of a wrong address all show up on the same day?

Expand  

 

Like I said earlier: the logistics are interesting, and a prime initial focus of the investigation.  But they're QUESTIONS, not answers.

 

And you're missing some other very obvious indicators.  Like: delivered not just on the same day, but at roughly the same local time.  And why doesn't the picture of the manila envelope shown previously in this thread appear to have the stamps cancelled?

Posted
  On 10/24/2018 at 5:09 PM, DC Tom said:

 

Like I said earlier: the logistics are interesting, and a prime initial focus of the investigation.  But they're QUESTIONS, not answers.

 

And you're missing some other very obvious indicators.  Like: delivered not just on the same day, but at roughly the same local time.  And why doesn't the picture of the manila envelope shown previously in this thread appear to have the stamps cancelled?

Expand  

 

Dexter, note that my post was phrased as a question.

×
×
  • Create New...