SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted October 22, 2018 Author Posted October 22, 2018 1 minute ago, CowgirlsFan said: I voted Peterman. He can't be bad forever. Lol. Some may disagree with you.
PlayoffsPlease Posted October 22, 2018 Posted October 22, 2018 Either start Peterman or cut him. If he is ranked below a random unprepared off the street QB like Derek Anderson, what the hell are we wasting a roster space on him for?
JPP Posted October 22, 2018 Posted October 22, 2018 3 hours ago, no name said: this guy This is awesome!!! Why not.....at this point couldnt hurt....
nedboy7 Posted October 22, 2018 Posted October 22, 2018 I say put Beane in there. Let's see him take a hit. 4 hours ago, Shotgunner said: My god. It's so sad that this is a real debate. We are actually talking about "Pick 6" Peterman starting again, and it isn't even preposterous given the circumstances. Still, Anderson had good moments and imo represents the best chance at scoring points in the immediate future. No you see this is the plan. It's a rebuild. Isn't it sweet? 16 minutes ago, JPP said: This is awesome!!! Why not.....at this point couldnt hurt.... Put that blonde in . At least there would be something to look at.
billsredneck1 Posted October 22, 2018 Posted October 22, 2018 43 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said: I can’t imagine why any Bills fan would want to trot Nathan Peterman out there on MNF to face the Patriots* Masochism? The organization would be ridiculed by NFL observers more than they already are. as opposed to what?
Boatdrinks Posted October 22, 2018 Posted October 22, 2018 1 minute ago, billsredneck1 said: as opposed to what? I believe the other choice in the poll was Anderson. The same would apply to most anyone else though.
lookylookyherecomescookie Posted October 22, 2018 Posted October 22, 2018 4 hours ago, Freddie's Dead said: Richard Pryor is dead. Did he ever even play football? well yeah, but on the plus side there's no tape on him for the Pats to study, and if he doesn't work out, we might be able to sneak him on to the practice squad. Mobility and arm strength could be a problem. 1
Brianmoorman4jesus Posted October 22, 2018 Posted October 22, 2018 Just start Anderson. He made some good throws. He just got put in a real tough spot with no Shady and then the clay fumble. We are going in there and instead of 6-3 or 7-6 us, it’s our defense getting tracks laid on it and 0-14 the next time we see it.
Billsfanatic8989 Posted October 22, 2018 Posted October 22, 2018 (edited) 4 hours ago, Boatdrinks said: It doesn’t matter in the end, but Anderson. Peterman would throw 3 pick sixes in the first minute FTFY Edited October 22, 2018 by Billsfanatic8989
TwistofFate Posted October 22, 2018 Posted October 22, 2018 Peterman If it's going to be this bad, who cares? Peterman is a win/win. He takes the valuable snaps and further developes, (he's only in his second year with 3 starts) which is a win, or he continues to do terrible, which is a win because we get a better draft pick. Either way, it's a win. 1 1
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted October 22, 2018 Author Posted October 22, 2018 1 minute ago, TwistofFate said: Peterman If it's going to be this bad, who cares? Peterman is a win/win. He takes the valuable snaps and further developes, (he's only in his second year with 3 starts) which is a win, or he continues to do terrible, which is a win because we get a better draft pick. Either way, it's a win. Sounds logical
Kevin1778 Posted October 22, 2018 Posted October 22, 2018 Just put in Peterman. Starting a retired backup QB is a joke. That was most embarrassing lost in years. That was a 1-5 team that made Anderson look like a college QB. 1
dgrochester55 Posted October 22, 2018 Posted October 22, 2018 Pegula "Well, bills fan, who do you like better Nate Peterman, or Derek Anderson? Who do you want to take care of your team for the next three weeks?"
NoSaint Posted October 22, 2018 Posted October 22, 2018 1 hour ago, CowgirlsFan said: I voted Peterman. He can't be bad forever. Why can’t he? 1
BuffaloBaumer Posted October 22, 2018 Posted October 22, 2018 9 minutes ago, TwistofFate said: Peterman If it's going to be this bad, who cares? Peterman is a win/win. He takes the valuable snaps and further developes, (he's only in his second year with 3 starts) which is a win, or he continues to do terrible, which is a win because we get a better draft pick. Either way, it's a win. This is exactly what needs to be done and how anyone could think that putting Anderson out there is anything other than a total waste of time shocks me 1 1
McBean Posted October 22, 2018 Posted October 22, 2018 11 minutes ago, TwistofFate said: Peterman If it's going to be this bad, who cares? Peterman is a win/win. He takes the valuable snaps and further developes, (he's only in his second year with 3 starts) which is a win, or he continues to do terrible, which is a win because we get a better draft pick. Either way, it's a win. My thoughts exactly. Anderson gives us nothing. 2
Chuck Wagon Posted October 22, 2018 Posted October 22, 2018 Peterman. Need to make it clear to McBeane he belongs nowhere near a NFL roster 1
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted October 22, 2018 Author Posted October 22, 2018 3 minutes ago, McBean said: My thoughts exactly. Anderson gives us nothing. Iirc. ^ This comes from a guy who want Nate gone. 1
CodeMonkey Posted October 22, 2018 Posted October 22, 2018 Anderson, assuming he doesn't re-retire by then.
Recommended Posts