The people marching to the boarder ???

[IDBillzFan]

24 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

 

Liberals, please take note:  These are not "brown people", as you're so keen to label them.

 

These are individuals with disparate and distinct national identities and histories.

 

 

Wowl. If you've lost Tijuana...someone needs to get Soros to the front of that stage and start making it rain.

[Nanker]

1 hour ago, B-Man said:

Mexican protesters took to the streets on Sunday to protest the growing influx of Central American migrants who have made their way to the border city of Tijuana.

 

In the most recent protest, groups of Tijuana residents want to evict the migrants from a shelter where approximately 2,000 Central Americans are staying. The Tijuana government set up the shelter as the city witnessed a reported buildup of federal and state police forces while the numbers of migrants continue to climb.

 

In two videos shared online by U.S. journalist Emily Green, dozens of protesters, some wearing wrestling masks and bandanas, can be seen marching towards the makeshift shelter.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Raysis protestors. 

[Deranged Rhino]

 

[3rdnlng]

I heard today but can't confirm it that out of the group stalled in Tijuana 500 of them are considered criminals. Obviously, take it with a grain of salt. Sea salt is preferable.

[Kevbeau]

1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Not sure if they used enough razor wire

[boyst]

1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Reports are that's at a federal prison

[3rdnlng]

16 minutes ago, Boyst62 said:

Reports are that's at a federal prison

What with all the sand it must be Club Med.

[Buffalo_Gal]

3 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Sooooo is it electrified too? 

[DC Tom]

1 hour ago, Boyst62 said:

Reports are that's at a federal prison

 

Doesn't look like one I've ever been in...

 

...er, doesn't look like one I've ever seen.  

[boyst]

1 hour ago, 3rdnlng said:

What with all the sand it must be Club Med.

They line between the bbarriers with sand to stop weeds etc. 

 

 

7 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Doesn't look like one I've ever been in...

 

...er, doesn't look like one I've ever seen.  

Read a bunch in Twitter that it was a prison

[DC Tom]

Just now, Boyst62 said:

They line between the bbarriers with sand to stop weeds etc. 

 

 

Read a bunch in Twitter that it was a prison

 

It's the border fence at Border Field State Park in San Diego, without razor wire.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Border_Field_State_Park#/media/File:United_States_-_Mexico_Ocean_Border_Fence_(15838118610).jpg

 

 

[B-Man]

RACISM IS EVERYWHERE, I GUESS: Shouting ‘Mexico First,’ Hundreds In Tijuana March Against Migrant Caravan.

 

“We want the caravan to go; they are invading us,” said Patricia Reyes, a 62-year-old protester, hiding from the sun under an umbrella. “They should have come into Mexico correctly, legally, but they came in like animals.” . . .

 

While the protesters numbered only a few hundred, in a city of more than 1.6 million, vitriol against the migrants has spread across social media in Tijuana in recent days.

 

“They should create concentration and deportation camps with federal funds,” wrote one commenter on the Facebook page organizing the march.

 

“Tijuana is a place that welcomes anyone, but you must have papers, you must identify yourself,” demonstrator Magdalena Baltazar said on Sunday, as she waved a Mexican flag and marched through the city. “We work hard here. We don’t get handouts. The government shouldn’t be giving things to migrants when plenty of Mexicans are in a difficult position.”

 

Most of the protesters said the migrants should be detained and deported.

 

 

It’s interesting to me that open borders are pretty unpopular everywhere except with the upper classes. But note the photo of Tijuana’s mayor in a red “Make Tijuana Great Again” hat.

 

You can also see it here.

 

[3rdnlng]

So, the 9th Circuit is once again setting up a de facto open border policy in time for the caravan people to reach the U.S. This ruling encourages violence at the border. It seems like this country is ruled by the 9th.

 

 

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/us-judge-blocks-trump-asylum-restrictions/ar-BBPRWA0?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=HPCOMMDHP15

 

SAN FRANCISCO, Nov 20 - A U.S. judge on Monday temporarily blocked an order by President Donald Trump that barred asylum for immigrants who enter the country illegally from Mexico, the latest courtroom defeat for Trump on immigration policy. 

 

U.S. District Judge Jon Tigar in San Francisco issued a temporary restraining order against the asylum rules. Tigar's order takes effect immediately, applies nationwide, and lasts until at least Dec. 19 when the judge scheduled a hearing to consider a more long-lasting injunction.

Representatives for the U.S. Department of Justice could not immediately be reached for comment.

Trump cited an overwhelmed immigration system for his recent proclamation that officials will only process asylum claims for migrants who present themselves at an official entry point. Civil rights groups sued, arguing that Trump's Nov. 9 order violated administrative and immigration law.

[Nanker]

Trump should get a fleet of busses assembled at Tijuana and load them up with these illegals and drop them off in Judge Tigar's backyard.

[3rdnlng]

3 minutes ago, Nanker said:

Trump should get a fleet of busses assembled at Tijuana and load them up with these illegals and drop them off in Judge Tigar's backyard.

Our laws already make it impossible to deal with illegal aliens once they gain entrance to our country. The judge's ruling is going to encourage illegals to sneak or rush into our border states creating violence. This will only encourage more caravans and massive migration.

[IDBillzFan]

5 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Our laws already make it impossible to deal with illegal aliens once they gain entrance to our country. The judge's ruling is going to encourage illegals to sneak or rush into our border states creating violence. This will only encourage more caravans and massive migration.

 

Or what the rest of the world calls "The DNC Official Plan For America."

[DC Tom]

33 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Our laws already make it impossible to deal with illegal aliens once they gain entrance to our country. The judge's ruling is going to encourage illegals to sneak or rush into our border states creating violence. This will only encourage more caravans and massive migration.

 

The ruling is, however, an entirely accurate and appropriate reading of immigration law and Constitutional law.

 

Immigration law is broken, it's not the courts' responsibility to fix it.  You can't simultaneously support the Gorsuch and Kavanaugh nominations and be against this ruling without being hypocritical.

[3rdnlng]

17 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

The ruling is, however, an entirely accurate and appropriate reading of immigration law and Constitutional law.

 

Immigration law is broken, it's not the courts' responsibility to fix it.  You can't simultaneously support the Gorsuch and Kavanaugh nominations and be against this ruling without being hypocritical.

I can't disagree with you but in the meantime our lack of immigration reform is killing us. What about the judge's ruling last year re DACA that took away any leverage Trump had to come up with some real reform? So now it's a "temporary" injunction for a month and then to rule on a permanent injunction. How long will this take to reach SCOTUS? They may rule that requiring the illegal aliens to enter through a port of entry is no more than the administration creating rules to insure an orderly process.

 

It's only right that we fix this immigration mess and not make sneaking into our country a viable way to become a resident. The courts have systematically ruled to take any reason away for any democrat cooperation. What do we need, a civil ***** war?

[BeginnersMind]

13 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

I can't disagree with you but in the meantime our lack of immigration reform is killing us.

1

 

If only one party had controlled Congress and the executive for two years.

14 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

What do we need, a civil ***** war?

 

 

No. We need Congress to do its job. 

[3rdnlng]

1 minute ago, BeginnersMind said:

 

If only one party had controlled Congress and the executive for two years.

That's some real weakshit right there. The dems were willing to give Trump what he wanted re the wall, chain migration and the lottery. Trump was willing to give the dems DACA protection for nearly 3 times the amount that they originally wanted. It was a done deal until a judge ruled that Trump couldn't rescind Obama's illegal EO. Don't forget about the 60 votes needed in the Senate and the fact that the R's were split in the House. Keep up playing stupid though, it seems like it comes natural.