Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, 3rdnlng said:

These people aren't supposed to be voters. In calling them so you freely admit that your faux compassion is just the desire to obtain illegal voters. BTW, Republicans have tripled their support among those U.S. citizens who are black and can vote.

How are they going to vote? You are stupid 

Posted
23 hours ago, Chandemonium said:

These poor migrants without any outside support must all be elite ultra distance runners. 

The pictures I see seem to depict a bunch of fat people.  I don't believe they are walking much at all.  How to people in extreme poverty weigh so much?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
4 hours ago, DC Tom said:

 

https://thegrio.com/2018/10/29/young-black-conservatives-stan-for-trump-at-white-house-leadership-summit/

 

 

You think Clinton's going to call for even more incivility?  Maxine Waters going to call for Republicans to be harassed even more?  You think I'll be assaulted by even more Antifa protesters outside my office?

Oh, I didn't know you were assaulted! Oh do tell us how you got attacked, did an old Jewish women look at you wrong? 

Posted
2 hours ago, Tiberius said:

Oh, I didn't know you were assaulted! Oh do tell us how you got attacked, did an old Jewish women look at you wrong? 

 

They are gonna take your job at the laundromat bro.         Don’t shoot yourself in the foot 

Posted

VICTOR DAVIS HANSON: Caravan Contradictions. 

 

“A ‘caravan’—the euphemism for a current foot-army of more than 10,000 Central Americans—of would-be border crossers has now passed into Mexico.

 

The marchers promise they will continue 1,000 miles and more northward to the U.S. border, despite warnings from President Trump that as unauthorized immigrants they will be turned away.

 

No one has yet explained how, or by whom or what, such a mass of humanity has been supplied, cared for, and organized.

 

Once at the border, the immigrants further predict that they will successfully, but illegally, enter the United States, then claim refugee status, and finally rely on sympathetic public opinion—and progressive political activism—to avoid deportation. If past experience is any guide, they are quite right in thinking they can melt into the population, ignore future legal summonses, and count on the de facto amnesty that currently protects 22 million illegal aliens, the vast majority from Mexico and Central America.”

 

.

 
Posted
2 hours ago, B-Man said:

Once at the border, the immigrants further predict that they will successfully, but illegally, enter the United States, then claim refugee status

 

This much is probably true.

 

What people haven't thought through yet is that the law requires they be detained until their hearing, and the administration is pretty scrupulously enforcing that law.  So they all have to be detained...somewhere.

 

And when I say "people haven't thought of that," I mean the media in general.  The caravan organizers, and certain activists in the US, have.  In fact, they're counting on it - the later everyone realizes that they'll be detained in the equivalent of Manzanar, the greater the outrage will be.

Posted

I would have thought the UN could have set up refugee camps for them in Mexico.

 

I'm for legal immigration and good border security. At least this is  not as dangerous as what is happening to Europe. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Where are these people taking a dump?

 

They're saving it up for the streets of San Francisco.

Posted

I say we continue to trash our own country South Park style until they don't want to come here!

 

Elect Obama for 8 more years!

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted

CHANGE: Trump to terminate birthright citizenship.

 

President Trump plans to sign an executive order that would remove the right to citizenship for babies of non-citizens and unauthorized immigrants born on U.S. soil, he said yesterday in an exclusive interview for “Axios on HBO,” a new four-part documentary news series debuting on HBO this Sunday at 6:30 p.m. ET/PT.

 

Why it matters: This would be the most dramatic move yet in Trump’s hardline immigration campaign, this time targeting “anchor babies” and “chain migration.” And it will set off another stand-off with the courts, as Trump’s power to do this through executive action is debatable to say the least.

 

 

He certainly isn’t afraid of a fight.

 
Posted
2 minutes ago, B-Man said:

CHANGE: Trump to terminate birthright citizenship.

 

President Trump plans to sign an executive order that would remove the right to citizenship for babies of non-citizens and unauthorized immigrants born on U.S. soil, he said yesterday in an exclusive interview for “Axios on HBO,” a new four-part documentary news series debuting on HBO this Sunday at 6:30 p.m. ET/PT.

 

Why it matters: This would be the most dramatic move yet in Trump’s hardline immigration campaign, this time targeting “anchor babies” and “chain migration.” And it will set off another stand-off with the courts, as Trump’s power to do this through executive action is debatable to say the least.

 

 

He certainly isn’t afraid of a fight.

 

 

He's continuing to rile up his base for the midterms. It's working.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
20 minutes ago, B-Man said:

CHANGE: Trump to terminate birthright citizenship.

 

President Trump plans to sign an executive order that would remove the right to citizenship for babies of non-citizens and unauthorized immigrants born on U.S. soil, he said yesterday in an exclusive interview for “Axios on HBO,” a new four-part documentary news series debuting on HBO this Sunday at 6:30 p.m. ET/PT.

 

Why it matters: This would be the most dramatic move yet in Trump’s hardline immigration campaign, this time targeting “anchor babies” and “chain migration.” And it will set off another stand-off with the courts, as Trump’s power to do this through executive action is debatable to say the least.

 

 

He certainly isn’t afraid of a fight.

 

 

Absolutely asinine.  His power to do that isn't "debatable."  It's non-existent: citizenship is codified in to law (the INA, specifically, 8 USC 1401(a) - it's not a 14th Amendment issue) and Trump cannot blithely override it with just a pen and a phone.  It also eliminates birth certificates as a determinate factor for citizenships, or creates a sovereignty issue with respect to them.  

 

It'll never happen.  This isn't Trump threatening to change the law with an EO, because that's clearly impossible.  This is Trump saying something wildly stupid to distract everyone from his ordering troops to the border and the creation of a new Manzanar.

 

EDIT: Peace, don't "thumbs up" this post.  You supported this sort of ***** when Obama did it, you partisan shitburglar.

Edited by DC Tom
  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
37 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Absolutely asinine.  His power to do that isn't "debatable."  It's non-existent: citizenship is codified in to law (the INA, specifically, 8 USC 1401(a) - it's not a 14th Amendment issue) and Trump cannot blithely override it with just a pen and a phone.  It also eliminates birth certificates as a determinate factor for citizenships, or creates a sovereignty issue with respect to them.  

 

It'll never happen.  This isn't Trump threatening to change the law with an EO, because that's clearly impossible.  This is Trump saying something wildly stupid to distract everyone from his ordering troops to the border and the creation of a new Manzanar.

 

EDIT: Peace, don't "thumbs up" this post.  You supported this sort of ***** when Obama did it, you partisan shitburglar.

 

Snowflake DC Tom melts because I "thumbs up" his post. It's going to be a soggy winter.

 

Lindsey Graham is already planning to introduce legislation to end birthright citizenship. Check out the pic of him below.

 

dr.thumb.jpg.5c1150190b05218a1e8557f0d42443ca.jpg

Posted
5 minutes ago, peace out said:

 

Snowflake DC Tom melts because I "thumbs up" his post. It's going to be a soggy winter.

 

 

You're a hypocrite.  ***** off.

  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...