Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
55 minutes ago, BurpleBull said:

 

McDermott should have stayed the course and stuck to his guns the way he and Daboll did all through training camp, amidst the cries from Allen's biggest supporters, to have his reps increased with the 1st team offense; instead, he was likely moved by outside voices and perhaps some inside voices, but mostly outside ones; how else could one explain the Bills' organization retaining a young QB deemed so bad and incorrigible?

 

I believe McDermott likely sees the potential for the lights to finally come on in Peterman and finally show the potential that caused him to take interest in him; and this why he continues to confidently insert him into ballgames at the dismay of many. 

 

If McDermott's going to continue to display this level of faith in Peterman, then he needs to be all in, and stick by him regardless of who on the outside might question it. Only then will he, Peterman, and those such as myself, who root for Peterman, truly know if he really belongs in the league or not. 

 

 

HC McDermott has put a lot on the line already in backing Peterman.

IF he starts Peterman Sunday and he fails...............again..............you say start him at home on Monday night against the Pats*?

 

The home fans will boo him when he walks to the huddle in front of the whole country.

It will be one of the worse moments in Buffalo sport history.

Posted

What Peterman needs most is to be released from his contractual obligations to the Buffalo Bills so he can focus on being God's child rather than being defined by his play on the football field.  Not unlike the trials of Job who was famously tested and then cut by the Bethlehem Bulls after it turned out he was just a trash football player. 

 

For all you godless heathens, the story goes God had bet on Job and the Bulls to cover the spread and when they got blown out, God McKelvin'ed his entire property and Kromer'ed the man's family. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 4
Posted
10 minutes ago, nero1 said:

Since most would agree that this offense has been inept with or without Peterman, the likelihood of turning this season around now is highly unlikely. Let Peterman play until Allen is 100%. There is no sense in killing the "future". 

That way you send the lockeroom a clear message that we're tanking this year.

Posted
1 hour ago, BurpleBull said:

Sean McDermott pretty much betrayed 'The Process' preached all summer long amidst mounting criticism from both fans of the Bills and national media.

 

 

There's no way that Josh Allen starting by Week Two was part of the plan all along.

 

 

It's an unfortunate admission because Sean McDermott and Nathan Peterman were both guys I championed during the head coaching hiring process and NFL draft, respectively.

 

 

Nathan Peterman had the abysmal showing against the Los Angeles Chargers, as the whole world knows, and he's still desperate to shake that; he was afforded the opportunity to repair his image this off-season and did pretty much all he could, to put himself in position to do just that nearing the regular season: he outplayed his competition in important areas during both training camp and preseason, and earned the right to be named starter against the Baltimore Ravens.

 

Another rough outing vs. the Ravens for the second-year player: Peterman finished the game 5 of 18 for 27 yards, no TD's, 2 INTs, 0.0 QB rating; pulled from the game a little after the third quarter began.

 

Of course Bills' fans and media talking heads who opposed his being named starter in the first place, were eager to see him scratched as starter the following week against those same Chargers' who assisted in etching Peterman's sullied reputation in stone. 

 

 

Wishes granted, but was it premature?  

 

 

We  put together our prediction threads or at the very least circle games on the NFL schedule that we should win entering the new season, and those 'winnable' games are more likely than not based off the opposing team's end from the previous season.

 

 

What we knew about the Baltimore Ravens entering game one, was that they failed to make the playoffs, struggled behind a stagnant offense that found itself near bottom in offensive rankings, and customarily finished strong defensively. 

 

 

Many were quick to call for the reins to be handed over to Josh Allen after week one, but I bet almost nobody knew that we were playing against a Baltimore Ravens' defense, that would be holding the No.1 overall spot in defensive rankings five weeks later, or ranking ninth in total offense for that matter.

 

 

The offense has been handed over to Josh Allen; he's had his hope-inspiring moments, still, even those who supported the switch to Allen, have suggested that he isn't ready to start, is leaving plays out on the field in both wins and losses, and isn't showing the progression from one week to the next, that they hoped for. 

 

 

Josh Allen vs. the No. 4 ranked Green Bay Packers defense: 16 of 33; 151 yards; 0 TD's; 2 INTs; sacked 7 times; passer rating of 36.3.

 

 

The creative mind in offensive coordinator Brian Daboll, got the stronger-armed QB who he was enamored with all throughout training camp calling the shots in time for that Week 4 matchup....same results essentially versus a top-5 rated defense.

 

 

To answer my own question: Yes, the switch from Peterman was premature.  

 

 

 

As we've seen from season opener, with time, things can progress for the better: the Bills' defense now hold the distinction of ranking third in total defense, despite its disastrous first outing.

 

 

 

So could have been the case with Nathan Peterman...we'll never know. 

 

 

McDermott should have stayed the course and stuck to his guns the way he and Daboll did all through training camp, amidst the cries from Allen's biggest supporters, to have his reps increased with the 1st team offense; instead, he was likely moved by outside voices and perhaps some inside voices, but mostly outside ones; how else could one explain the Bills' organization retaining a young QB deemed so bad and incorrigible?

 

 

I believe McDermott likely sees the potential for the lights to finally come on in Peterman and finally show the potential that caused him to take interest in him; and this why he continues to confidently insert him into ballgames at the dismay of many. 

 

 

Peterman must be allowed  to start consecutive games if he's to ever develop and learn from his errors.

 

 

6 games played in, three started in, only one of which was a home game...Los Angeles at Buffalo would've been the perfect follow-up game to attempt to get his confidence back on track.

 

 

 

If McDermott's going to continue to display this level of faith in Peterman, then he needs to be all in, and stick by him regardless of who on the outside might question it. Only then will he, Peterman, and those such as myself, who root for Peterman, truly know if he really belongs in the league or not. 

 

 

 

 

 

  I don't know that it is about a light coming on for Peterman.  Some can handle it when the bullets are for real and some can't.  Peterman can get it done Mon-Sat but it all comes apart on Sunday.  I will support the team and hope there is a Biblical type miracle where all of a sudden Peterman becomes super cool on Sunday and gets it done.

Posted

The amazing thing about this perspective is that Nate Peterman has probably gotten more opportunities than any 5th round QB in history. He’s bombed horribly. Now he just needs a 5th opportunity? ?

Posted
2 minutes ago, Warcodered said:

That way you send the lockeroom a clear message that we're tanking this year.

No this is the way the lockeroom steps up. These are men not sissy's. The offense is already offensive and the Defense has seen nothing from the other side yet, so why kill the future.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Jauronimo said:

What Peterman needs most is to be released from his contractual obligations to the Buffalo Bills so he can focus on being God's child rather than being defined by his play on the football field.  Not unlike the trials of Job who was famously tested and then cut by the Bethlehem Bulls after it turned out he was just a trash football player. 

 

For all you godless heathens, the story goes God had bet on Job and the Bulls to cover the spread and when they got blown out, God McKelvin'ed his entire property and Kromer'ed the man's family. 

  Maybe Peterman will find this "light" people keep talking about when the Bills are on the road to play the Damascus Dalmatians?

Posted

He is a 5th round pick. You dont plan around a guy like him. You dont worry about giving him enough time. You dont worry about ruining him. Fact is he got more chances than most 5th rounders ever get. He has proven that he does not belong in the league. It is unfortunate the team keeps trotting him out there to embarrass himself. They should see that and not put him in the position they are. 

Posted
Just now, vincec said:

The amazing thing about this perspective is that Nate Peterman has probably gotten more opportunities than any 5th round QB in history. He’s bombed horribly. Now he just needs a 5th opportunity? ?

 

He needs open and honest counsel from McDermott regarding an updated resume for his next career path. 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Jauronimo said:

What Peterman needs most is to be released from his contractual obligations to the Buffalo Bills so he can focus on being God's child rather than being defined by his play on the football field.  Not unlike the trials of Job who was famously tested and then cut by the Bethlehem Bulls after it turned out he was just a trash football player. 

 

For all you godless heathens, the story goes God had bet on Job and the Bulls to cover the spread and when they got blown out, God McKelvin'ed his entire property and Kromer'ed the man's family. 

Nominee for post of the year right there. Lmfao

Posted
2 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

He needs open and honest counsel from McDermott regarding an updated resume for his next career path. 

that s what I thought the OP was going to mean by "steadfastness".  As in, steadfastness to calmly let the man know he is not going to be an NFL quarterback.

 

what was actually posted is pure fantasy.

 

I wish the guy well, there may even be a spiritual talk circuit in his future (c.f. Frank Reich), but it is clear his path is not here.

Posted
8 minutes ago, Jauronimo said:

What Peterman needs most is to be released from his contractual obligations to the Buffalo Bills so he can focus on being God's child rather than being defined by his play on the football field.  Not unlike the trials of Job who was famously tested and then cut by the Bethlehem Bulls after it turned out he was just a trash football player. 

 

For all you godless heathens, the story goes God had bet on Job and the Bulls to cover the spread and when they got blown out, God McKelvin'ed his entire property and Kromer'ed the man's family. 

 

3 minutes ago, RochesterRob said:

  Maybe Peterman will find this "light" people keep talking about when the Bills are on the road to play the Damascus Dalmatians?

 

Hoping Peterman succeeds would take a miracle not seen since "fishes and loaves" night.

Posted

What I got from the op is they just need to let Nate be terrible and leave him and keep starting him and eventually he'll not be terrible. By which I assume he mean it'll eventually be preseason again.

Posted

That post rambled on way too long.

 

If you are saying the Peterman should have been given more time as the starter, you are insane.

 

Goodbye.

×
×
  • Create New...