Buffalo_Gal Posted March 7, 2019 Posted March 7, 2019 The last numbers I saw was Fox News runs 55% negative stories about the Trump administration, 45% positive about the administration. In this day and age when the rest of the networks are running 90%+ negative stories daily about the Trump administration, that is construed as "being for Trump". Think about it - a network runs negative stories about an administration more than half of the time, and yet is still considered "for" the administration because they are almost "balanced". The MSM is nuts. And for more crazy: 1
DC Tom Posted March 7, 2019 Posted March 7, 2019 8 hours ago, Hedge said: Reparations for...everyone!? I'll vote for him only if his running mate is named "Yin." 1
row_33 Posted March 7, 2019 Posted March 7, 2019 Hillary gets the nod, she played her hand this week and will enter at the last moment she can still take it. Her saying she wasn't running is as laughable as Steinbrenner telling us Billy was his manager "for life" 2
Buffalo_Gal Posted March 7, 2019 Posted March 7, 2019 Priorities USA, one of the largest Democratic super PACs in the country, released a report in February that listed Ohio low on its priorities in the 2020 presidential election. President Donald Trump won Ohio handily in 2016. </snip> 1
Deranged Rhino Posted March 7, 2019 Posted March 7, 2019 2 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Priorities USA, one of the largest Democratic super PACs in the country, released a report in February that listed Ohio low on its priorities in the 2020 presidential election. President Donald Trump won Ohio handily in 2016. </snip> That means the Midwest is not as in play as the left says publicly. Which means they can't win in 2020. 1
Buffalo_Gal Posted March 7, 2019 Posted March 7, 2019 14 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: That means the Midwest is not as in play as the left says publicly. Which means they can't win in 2020. Well, reading that article, they have ruled out Iowa too, but have not yet ruled out Georgia or Arizona. so, apparently, "there is a chance" (a small one). I'd LOVE to know the internal polls show for both parties. 1
Deranged Rhino Posted March 7, 2019 Posted March 7, 2019 Just now, Buffalo_Gal said: Well, reading that article, they have ruled out Iowa too, but have not yet ruled out Georgia or Arizona. so, apparently, "there is a chance" (a small one). I'd LOVE to know the internal polls show for both parties. Brown just announced he's not running - he was their last great hope to reclaim the working class voters they lost in 2016. (those thinking Biden can bring those voters back are kidding themselves - he's toxic). If Brown is dropping out, his numbers must have been terrible. 1
row_33 Posted March 7, 2019 Posted March 7, 2019 (edited) 12 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Brown just announced he's not running - he was their last great hope to reclaim the working class voters they lost in 2016. (those thinking Biden can bring those voters back are kidding themselves - he's toxic). If Brown is dropping out, his numbers must have been terrible. isn't this incredibly early for candidates to be putting a lot on the line for a campaign? especially if its pretty much a lost cause at this point in time? Edited March 7, 2019 by row_33 1
Buffalo_Gal Posted March 7, 2019 Posted March 7, 2019 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: Brown just announced he's not running - he was their last great hope to reclaim the working class voters they lost in 2016. (those thinking Biden can bring those voters back are kidding themselves - he's toxic). If Brown is dropping out, his numbers must have been terrible. Yeah, Bloomberg decided not to run the other day saying he will spend $100M to "stop Donald Trump" (or something along those lines). At some point they will drop due to the economic realities. I have thought Harris was "the chosen one" but if the D internals are as horrible as suspected, I'm not certain why the DNC would want to sacrifice her in 2020. You'd think they would want to push out an "old white" male/female so they could say "LOOK! SEEEEEEE! We need a MINORITY person to run!" and hold her for 2024. *shrug* I have no idea what the Democrats are doing right now though, and I'm not sure they know either. 1
keepthefaith Posted March 7, 2019 Posted March 7, 2019 I would have bet heavily on Biden running a couple months ago but I don't think he's going to run. I think Bernie's big money raise and big poll numbers and his own party telling everyone that they need diversity in their candidate may keep him away. 1
3rdnlng Posted March 7, 2019 Posted March 7, 2019 1 minute ago, keepthefaith said: I would have bet heavily on Biden running a couple months ago but I don't think he's going to run. I think Bernie's big money raise and big poll numbers and his own party telling everyone that they need diversity in their candidate may keep him away. Biden has always been wishy washy about everything. As I remember, he said he wouldn't have pulled the trigger on the Osama killing because there was too much of a downside if the mission failed.
reddogblitz Posted March 7, 2019 Posted March 7, 2019 (edited) Uncle Joe is gonna run IMHO. https://www.npr.org/2017/11/14/563672229/promise-me-joe-biden-on-loss-grief-and-recovery Edited March 7, 2019 by reddogblitz
Tiberius Posted March 7, 2019 Posted March 7, 2019 Kamala Harris is done. The scandal involving her not moving fast enough about tainted evidence is a killer. Good thing Dems have so many great candidates
IDBillzFan Posted March 7, 2019 Posted March 7, 2019 5 minutes ago, reddogblitz said: Uncle Joe is gonna run IMHO. https://www.npr.org/2017/11/14/563672229/promise-me-joe-biden-on-loss-grief-and-recovery I hope so.
DC Tom Posted March 7, 2019 Posted March 7, 2019 6 minutes ago, LABillzFan said: I hope so. Of course, that's come full-circle, and nowadays it's African-Americans demanding segregation because their black children can't learn while they're being oppressed by the presence of white children. Biden was just a prophet. Unlike, y'know, Romney when he called Russia our greatest geopolitical foe...
row_33 Posted March 7, 2019 Posted March 7, 2019 It took awhile for people to realize that white kids weren't getting much in their public school education.
RochesterRob Posted March 7, 2019 Posted March 7, 2019 5 hours ago, row_33 said: Hillary gets the nod, she played her hand this week and will enter at the last moment she can still take it. Her saying she wasn't running is as laughable as Steinbrenner telling us Billy was his manager "for life" As I said recently don't count her out until the stroke of midnight election day 2020 and the votes officially have her ruled out. She no doubt fantasizes while laying in bed about the panicked phone call from the DNC around Easter of next year begging her to run. Probably working better for her than even the Hitachi. 1
DC Tom Posted March 7, 2019 Posted March 7, 2019 4 minutes ago, RochesterRob said: As I said recently don't count her out until the stroke of midnight election day 2020 and the votes officially have her ruled out. She no doubt fantasizes while laying in bed about the panicked phone call from the DNC around Easter of next year begging her to run. Probably working better for her than even the Hitachi. And even if she doesn't run, I could see her holding a press conference the morning after polling, refusing to accept the results of the election and explaining how it's everyone's fault but hers that she didn't win... 1 1
Recommended Posts