Golden Goat Posted February 24, 2019 Posted February 24, 2019 15 minutes ago, Doc Brown said: Minorities are more likely to vote for people they feel represent them. The Clinton's are still popular the black community which is why Hillary dominated in states with a higher black population percentage compared to states Bernie won like South Carolina, Mississippi, Alabama, and Georgia where she received over 75% of the vote. Maybe southern minorities just don't buy into the whole socialism thing?
IDBillzFan Posted February 24, 2019 Posted February 24, 2019 49 minutes ago, Doc Brown said: Never said that because it would be factually inaccurate as 17% prefer Harris or Booker. My point was to illustrate the problem Bernie's going to have with people of color. What you said was Biden and Bernie were way out in front because the state is mostly white. That sounds a lot like they're voting for Biden and Bernie because they're white.
Doc Brown Posted February 24, 2019 Posted February 24, 2019 (edited) 8 minutes ago, LABillzFan said: What you said was Biden and Bernie were way out in front because the state is mostly white. That sounds a lot like they're voting for Biden and Bernie because they're white. I should've been more clear as it did seem I implied that. Bernie will fare worse in states that have a larger African American percentage of Democratic primary voters. Harris and Booker will likely perform better in those states. Therefore, the New Hampshire poll should be taken with a grain of salt. Edited February 24, 2019 by Doc Brown 1
Doc Brown Posted February 24, 2019 Posted February 24, 2019 13 minutes ago, Golden Goat said: Maybe southern minorities just don't buy into the whole socialism thing? I doubt it as their platforms weren't that different. I think this article accurately reflects why African Americans preferred Hillary over Bernie in such states. https://www.thenation.com/article/african-american-voters-have-a-good-reason-to-support-hillary-clinton/
IDBillzFan Posted February 25, 2019 Posted February 25, 2019 Bold Warren position here. Nice to see a candidate really put themselves out. So many people believe that science is actually magic, but only Warren has the boldness to say, "NO! Science is real, and I believe in it!"
DC Tom Posted February 25, 2019 Posted February 25, 2019 19 minutes ago, LABillzFan said: Bold Warren position here. Nice to see a candidate really put themselves out. So many people believe that science is actually magic, but only Warren has the boldness to say, "NO! Science is real, and I believe in it!" Of course, she only has to believe in 1/1024 of science to be a scientist...
DC Tom Posted February 25, 2019 Posted February 25, 2019 52 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: And that is why I would have voted for him. Honesty. 1
reddogblitz Posted February 25, 2019 Posted February 25, 2019 4 minutes ago, DC Tom said: And that is why I would have voted for him. Honesty. He would have beaten Trump IMHO. 1
Doc Brown Posted February 26, 2019 Posted February 26, 2019 5 hours ago, reddogblitz said: He would have beaten Trump IMHO. Probably as they both ran as populists where one scapegoated the rich and the other scapegoated immigrants. Both railed against losing manufacturing jobs from trade deals, called for national infrastructure bills, vowed not to touch entitlement programs, pushed for getting troops out of Syria/Iraq/Afghanistan, were against the Iraq War, and didn't take any PAC money. He would've carried the three "blue wall" states that Trump took. 1
plenzmd1 Posted February 26, 2019 Posted February 26, 2019 I guess this is the right place for this. ..Trump 2020 seems a foregone conclusion if this is how Dems think now. BTW, dude i follow on twitter posted this, I have no idea where it came or the veracity of such claims, so take it for what it is worth
Foxx Posted February 26, 2019 Posted February 26, 2019 3 hours ago, plenzmd1 said: I guess this is the right place for this. ..Trump 2020 seems a foregone conclusion if this is how Dems think now. BTW, dude i follow on twitter posted this, I have no idea where it came or the veracity of such claims, so take it for what it is worth i would think about possibly stop following him. not only is that crazy, but above 45% and above 55% doesn't add up.
Uncle Joe Posted February 26, 2019 Posted February 26, 2019 1 hour ago, Buffalo_Gal said: I was expecting to see a staffer with some Minnesota 2018 NFC Conference Championship gear on.
B-Man Posted February 26, 2019 Posted February 26, 2019 VIP Veep! Biden Demands Rock-Star Treatment...Bernie Raises $10M in Week; 39% From NEW Donors... Socialism talk will sink Democrats: How left-wing overreach could backfire big-time in 2020 New York Daily News, by Richard Cohen Original Article . .
Hedge Posted February 26, 2019 Posted February 26, 2019 Do not pass Go. Proceed directly to idiots. Moving a countrywide coalition one step closer to circumventing the Electoral College. 1
plenzmd1 Posted February 26, 2019 Posted February 26, 2019 54 minutes ago, Foxx said: i would think about possibly stop following him. not only is that crazy, but above 45% and above 55% doesn't add up. Ha, great point! Dude is a total tool, but an influencer in HR Tech sos I need to know what he be tweetin
DC Tom Posted February 26, 2019 Posted February 26, 2019 57 minutes ago, Foxx said: i would think about possibly stop following him. not only is that crazy, but above 45% and above 55% doesn't add up. They're not mutually exclusive options. 3 minutes ago, Hedge said: Do not pass Go. Proceed directly to idiots. Moving a countrywide coalition one step closer to circumventing the Electoral College. I hope his state goes Democrat, but Trump wins the popular vote, and his head explodes. 2 1 1
Recommended Posts