Foxx Posted February 26, 2020 Posted February 26, 2020 https://twitter.com/ReverendJames1/status/1232685300088033284 3
Foxx Posted February 26, 2020 Posted February 26, 2020 https://twitter.com/ABC/status/1232685096253214720 3
Foxx Posted February 26, 2020 Posted February 26, 2020 On 2/25/2020 at 9:16 AM, Foxx said: it all began with: look at the imagery of the last image, does it remind anyone of anything? Sanders is the ultimate next guy who the globalists want to implement their 'agenda'. the problem is, they are not sure he is the right guy at the right time, he is too early. he was supposed to be the 'next guy', after the next guy that could bring us just down the road a little further in the plan unveiled under the obamanation. we just need to be pushed a bit further down the socialist road so that we will eagerly accept the full blown ideology when it is adopted. of course, it may be that Trump has so thwarted their plans that they are left with no other alternative than to try and force that change upon us in the current paradigm. damn the torpedoes and deal with the fallout after the fact may be the revised plan to put us back on their planned track. long ago they found that in order for them to implement their globalist desires, they understood that it is going to be much easier to reduce the US to third world status than it would be to raise third world countries to first world status and would take entirely too long to do, if it is even possible. Sanders is their wet dream, don't fall for their rhetoric. https://twitter.com/SaraCarterDC/status/1232654285122494464 1 2
Foxx Posted February 26, 2020 Posted February 26, 2020 https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1232454713196470272 1
B-Man Posted February 26, 2020 Posted February 26, 2020 (edited) . Edited February 26, 2020 by B-Man 1 1
TakeYouToTasker Posted February 26, 2020 Posted February 26, 2020 5 hours ago, GG said: Minor correction. The communists were always after racial strife as a weapon, and came close in the 60s. Intersectionality is a reboot of their strategy from 50 years ago. It was a secondary focus however. Their main focus was class strife, but when it failed to materialize due to massive quality of life improvements, of course facilitated by technology leaps, economies of scale, etc. in a largely capitalist economy; the shift was to make racial strife central.
Westside Posted February 26, 2020 Posted February 26, 2020 2 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Sanders would have beat Trump in 2016 He couldn't even beat crooked Hillary. Oh wait, he did. Hahahahaha
GG Posted February 26, 2020 Posted February 26, 2020 1 minute ago, TakeYouToTasker said: It was a secondary focus however. Their main focus was class strife, but when it failed to materialize due to massive quality of life improvements, of course facilitated by technology leaps, economies of scale, etc. in a largely capitalist economy; the shift was to make racial strife central. Definitely agree on the timeline, considering the movement started in Europe. But as soon as it crossed the Atlantic, racial strife became a central plank. A race war was always promoted by Soviet elements in the US.
Tiberius Posted February 26, 2020 Posted February 26, 2020 Just now, westside2 said: He couldn't even beat crooked Hillary. Oh wait, he did. Hahahahaha The FBI wouldn't have launched an investigation against him ten days before the election...or maybe they would have... 1
Westside Posted February 26, 2020 Posted February 26, 2020 1 minute ago, Tiberius said: The FBI wouldn't have launched an investigation against him ten days before the election...or maybe they would have... She's lucky she wasn't thrown in prison much less investigated. What she did is highly illegal, but she's a democrat so that makes it ok. 2
BuffaloHokie13 Posted February 26, 2020 Posted February 26, 2020 Just now, westside2 said: She's lucky she wasn't thrown in prison much less investigated. What she did is highly illegal, but she's a democrat so that makes it ok. You haven't been paying attention. Running for president makes you immune to all investigations of past crimes. 1 1
Westside Posted February 26, 2020 Posted February 26, 2020 Just now, BuffaloHokie13 said: You haven't been paying attention. Running for president makes you immune to all investigations of past crimes. Thank you for reminding me. Lol I think that only applies to Democrats though.
Tiberius Posted February 26, 2020 Posted February 26, 2020 6 minutes ago, westside2 said: She's lucky she wasn't thrown in prison much less investigated. What she did is highly illegal, but she's a democrat so that makes it ok. For not doing anything wrong? Ya, ok. Trump's people are doing the exact same thing.
B-Man Posted February 26, 2020 Posted February 26, 2020 29 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: What ? Old insincere, half-apologies don't count anymore ? ? 1
Recommended Posts