3rdnlng Posted February 4, 2020 Posted February 4, 2020 29 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: He was expected to finish in the top 2 in both, at worst. Finishing 4th or 5th would be a disaster for Joe. Not even a SC win could save him then. You backed the wrong horse. I tried to warn ya'. But Mayor Pete had him when he said hello.
Hedge Posted February 4, 2020 Posted February 4, 2020 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: The state of the party is a-okay. The kicker is that his severance package is worth more than the DNC currently has on hand. 2 2
transplantbillsfan Posted February 4, 2020 Posted February 4, 2020 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: He was expected to finish in the top 2 in both, at worst. Finishing 4th or 5th would be a disaster for Joe. Not even a SC win could save him then. You backed the wrong horse. I tried to warn ya'. Wait... Are you pretending it's Biden I'm backing??? Remind yourself of our bet please... 1
Deranged Rhino Posted February 4, 2020 Posted February 4, 2020 12 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said: Wait... Are you pretending it's Biden I'm backing??? Remind yourself of our bet please... I'm aware you have the field, but your first forays into this thread Biden was your dude. Our bet evolved from that point 1
4merper4mer Posted February 4, 2020 Posted February 4, 2020 4 hours ago, transplantbillsfan said: Wait... Are you pretending it's Biden I'm backing??? Remind yourself of our bet please... Shirley
B-Man Posted February 4, 2020 Posted February 4, 2020 Iowa caucus mess nothing compared to intra-Democratic Party chaos on the horizon. . 1
transplantbillsfan Posted February 4, 2020 Posted February 4, 2020 8 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: I'm aware you have the field, but your first forays into this thread Biden was your dude. Our bet evolved from that point It didn't evolve in the sense that you think it did. You just always seemed to misunderstand my thoughts about the candidates and it seems you still do a bit. From the beginning I said I wanted the field, not Biden. 1
Deranged Rhino Posted February 4, 2020 Posted February 4, 2020 29 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said: It didn't evolve in the sense that you think it did. You just always seemed to misunderstand my thoughts about the candidates and it seems you still do a bit. From the beginning I said I wanted the field, not Biden. From the beginning you said it was a sure thing that Joe would win the nomination and beat Trump. You hit that hard, repeatedly (not that you wanted Joe, but that's how it would go) -- I told you that Joe had no chance. And he doesn't. 1 1
transplantbillsfan Posted February 4, 2020 Posted February 4, 2020 34 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: From the beginning you said it was a sure thing that Joe would win the nomination and beat Trump. You hit that hard, repeatedly (not that you wanted Joe, but that's how it would go) -- I told you that Joe had no chance. And he doesn't. Not sure thing but that he's the most likely candidate. And my opinion on that hasn't changed. 1
Deranged Rhino Posted February 4, 2020 Posted February 4, 2020 1 minute ago, transplantbillsfan said: Not sure thing but that he's the most likely candidate. And my opinion on that hasn't changed. You might want to reassess. (This all is intended in good natured ribbing, just for clarity, Transplant) 1
Gavin in Va Beach Posted February 4, 2020 Posted February 4, 2020 4 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: You might want to reassess. (This all is intended in good natured ribbing, just for clarity, Transplant) I find it interesting that both Sanders and Warren got as many votes as they did. I would have thought they were both going after the same Democrat-Socialist segment, making their numbers both lower. That they are both high tells me that it's the Democrat-Socialist segment of the party that is energized and showing up, and the more moderate segment is probably staying home. 4
transplantbillsfan Posted February 4, 2020 Posted February 4, 2020 5 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: You might want to reassess. (This all is intended in good natured ribbing, just for clarity, Transplant) I get it. But it's Iowa. What is it... like 1% of the delegates they give out? I know your argument is that historically the Iowa caucuses are largely predictive , especially if combined with New Hampshire. But the race was never really starting for Biden until South Carolina. And while historical trends may lean one way, you've claimed multiple times 2016 flipped the world on its head, so saying that while throwing out historical trends is a convenient contradiction, no? 1
Recommended Posts