row_33 Posted July 6, 2019 Posted July 6, 2019 we make our minds up on the suitability of a candidate, or a job applicant, in about 15 seconds and that's basically it for eternity some studies have found 2 seconds is just as reliable to make this determination. 1
3rdnlng Posted July 7, 2019 Posted July 7, 2019 2 hours ago, DC Tom said: That's...uh...not really a *****in' thing, is it? It's probably a blow up doll.
B-Man Posted July 7, 2019 Posted July 7, 2019 Ho-hum .....................the Republicans are going to "pounce" angle.....................what a surprise..
Tiberius Posted July 7, 2019 Posted July 7, 2019 t) Poll Results Spread General Election: Trump vs. Biden ABC News/Wash Post Biden 53, Trump 43 Biden +10 General Election: Trump vs. Harris ABC News/Wash Post Harris 48, Trump 46 Harris +2 General Election: Trump vs. Sanders ABC News/Wash Post Sanders 49, Trump 48 Sanders +1 General Election: Trump vs. Warren ABC News/Wash Post Warren 48, Trump 48 Tie General Election: Trump vs. Buttigieg ABC News/Wash Post Buttigieg 47, Trump 47 Tie President Trump Job Approval 1
RochesterRob Posted July 7, 2019 Posted July 7, 2019 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: t) Poll Results Spread General Election: Trump vs. Biden ABC News/Wash Post Biden 53, Trump 43 Biden +10 General Election: Trump vs. Harris ABC News/Wash Post Harris 48, Trump 46 Harris +2 General Election: Trump vs. Sanders ABC News/Wash Post Sanders 49, Trump 48 Sanders +1 General Election: Trump vs. Warren ABC News/Wash Post Warren 48, Trump 48 Tie General Election: Trump vs. Buttigieg ABC News/Wash Post Buttigieg 47, Trump 47 Tie President Trump Job Approval So you are reduced to citing flawed polls? We know that WaPo is desperate to be rid of Trump. 1
snafu Posted July 7, 2019 Author Posted July 7, 2019 On 6/16/2019 at 10:42 PM, Doc Brown said: 3 hours ago, Tiberius said: t) Poll Results Spread General Election: Trump vs. Biden ABC News/Wash Post Biden 53, Trump 43 Biden +10 General Election: Trump vs. Harris ABC News/Wash Post Harris 48, Trump 46 Harris +2 General Election: Trump vs. Sanders ABC News/Wash Post Sanders 49, Trump 48 Sanders +1 General Election: Trump vs. Warren ABC News/Wash Post Warren 48, Trump 48 Tie General Election: Trump vs. Buttigieg ABC News/Wash Post Buttigieg 47, Trump 47 Tie President Trump Job Approval Maybe the Dems should quit while they’re ahead. They keep talking and Trump’s numbers go up. 1 1 1
/dev/null Posted July 7, 2019 Posted July 7, 2019 3 minutes ago, row_33 said: money line odds are the only true indicator Even the oddsmakers got 2016 wrong 1
B-Man Posted July 7, 2019 Posted July 7, 2019 RITUAL SUICIDE OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY The Democrats’ race to the left continues, as Kamala Harris and Elizabeth Warren introduce “racial equity” plans. Ms. Warren and Senator Kamala Harris of California both used the occasion — the annual culture and music festival sponsored by Essence magazine, which caters to black women — to introduce major new proposals intended to address racial disparities, including in wealth and homeownership. *** Ms. Harris announced a plan aimed at reducing the racial gap in homeownership, including $100 billion to help black families and individuals buy homes in historically redlined communities, where banks systematically denied them loans. Redlining has been illegal for how many decades now? And the idea that the federal government knows better than banks who should get loans, and at what rates, is not only absurd, it was the principal cause of the 2008 financial collapse. The money would help cover down payments and closing costs for up to four million families or individuals, providing home buyers with up to $25,000 each. From Obamaphones to Harrishouses. Obviously the government can’t say openly that it is discriminating against whites, Asians and Hispanics by offering $25,000 only to black individuals or families. Harris’s transparent workaround is to limit eligibility to “historically red-lined communities.” I have no opinion, offhand, on whether that dodge could pass constitutional muster, but in any event, there is zero chance of it being enacted. Mrs. Warren has a different set of panders: (More at the link) .
row_33 Posted July 7, 2019 Posted July 7, 2019 6 minutes ago, /dev/null said: Even the oddsmakers got 2016 wrong It shifted dramatically during the night what people put $$ on is a billion times more important than giving an opinion on a biased question
/dev/null Posted July 7, 2019 Posted July 7, 2019 1 minute ago, row_33 said: It shifted dramatically during the night yeah, once the raw numbers started rolling in is when people noticed something wasn't going according to plan
row_33 Posted July 7, 2019 Posted July 7, 2019 2 minutes ago, /dev/null said: yeah, once the raw numbers started rolling in is when people noticed something wasn't going according to plan Pennsylvania delayed the result for hours after the polls were closed, that was the last attempt to rig it for Hillary.
row_33 Posted July 7, 2019 Posted July 7, 2019 Wait, Amash is holding us in suspense over his Presidential run.
Deranged Rhino Posted July 7, 2019 Posted July 7, 2019 Bye, Joe. He apologized (again) yesterday... a bad sign for a candidate in the lead. Joe has zero chance to win, as I've been saying for over a year. Zilch.
row_33 Posted July 7, 2019 Posted July 7, 2019 9 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Bye, Joe. He apologized (again) yesterday... a bad sign for a candidate in the lead. Joe has zero chance to win, as I've been saying for over a year. Zilch. He’s the only one of the 20 who has even 1 percent Presidential chops figure the Dems know it’s already a snowball’s chance so they will just be babyish and try to ruin it all?
/dev/null Posted July 7, 2019 Posted July 7, 2019 14 minutes ago, row_33 said: He’s the only one of the 20 who has even 1 percent Presidential chops figure the Dems know it’s already a snowball’s chance so they will just be babyish and try to ruin it all? i kinda wonder if the Dems have written off 2020 and are just using it to see how far left they can go ahead of 2024 3
Doc Brown Posted July 7, 2019 Posted July 7, 2019 5 hours ago, snafu said: Maybe the Dems should quit while they’re ahead. They keep talking and Trump’s numbers go up. The most important part of that poll is the final question. The word socialism doesn't seem to attach to Biden which explains the discrepancy between his lead and how close everyone else is. Or.....Jeff Bezos doesn't want a president that isn't cozy to big businesses.
Buffalo_Gal Posted July 7, 2019 Posted July 7, 2019 33 minutes ago, /dev/null said: i kinda wonder if the Dems have written off 2020 and are just using it to see how far left they can go ahead of 2024 Which makes me wonder why they would let anyone except Biden (who is an old white guy aka a throw-away candidate) get the nomination. I've thought Kamala was the "chosen one" since she declared. Why "waste" her on 2020 though? 1
Recommended Posts