reddogblitz Posted March 29, 2019 Posted March 29, 2019 2 minutes ago, snafu said: (1) it is lech. (2) look at the expressions on everyone not named Biden in that photo. Looks like they all want to kick his ass. Smoky the Bear certainly does. 1
row_33 Posted March 29, 2019 Posted March 29, 2019 25 minutes ago, reddogblitz said: Smoky the Bear certainly does.
3rdnlng Posted March 29, 2019 Posted March 29, 2019 40 minutes ago, snafu said: (1) it is lech. (2) look at the expressions on everyone not named Biden in that photo. Looks like they all want to kick his ass. Letch - definition of letch by The Free Dictionary https://www.thefreedictionary.com/letch letch also lech (lĕch) n. 1. A strong, especially sexual desire or craving. 2. A lecher. [Perhaps back-formation from obsolete letcher, variant of lecher.] letch (lɛtʃ) vb, n a variant spelling of lech [C18: perhaps back formation from lecher] letch or lech (lɛtʃ) Slang. n. 1. a lecherous desire or craving. 2. a lecher. v.i. 3. to behave like a ... 1
row_33 Posted March 29, 2019 Posted March 29, 2019 Joe isn't a bad option if the, shudder, other side has a chance to win and run the country..... Probably the best.
DC Tom Posted March 29, 2019 Posted March 29, 2019 2 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: Letch - definition of letch by The Free Dictionary https://www.thefreedictionary.com/letch letch also lech (lĕch) n. 1. A strong, especially sexual desire or craving. 2. A lecher. [Perhaps back-formation from obsolete letcher, variant of lecher.] letch (lɛtʃ) vb, n a variant spelling of lech [C18: perhaps back formation from lecher] letch or lech (lɛtʃ) Slang. n. 1. a lecherous desire or craving. 2. a lecher. v.i. 3. to behave like a ... So "letch" is a variant of "lech." So he was right, but you're still going to argue. Good luck, Mr. Schiff. In fact, I'm coining a new word for this: to "schiff," v., To argue past the point of being demonstrated wrong, in the mistaken belief that you can still win the argument.
3rdnlng Posted March 29, 2019 Posted March 29, 2019 2 minutes ago, DC Tom said: So "letch" is a variant of "lech." So he was right, but you're still going to argue. Good luck, Mr. Schiff. In fact, I'm coining a new word for this: to "schiff," v., To argue past the point of being demonstrated wrong, in the mistaken belief that you can still win the argument. I'm glad you are just an idiot judge, not a vocabulary judge.
snafu Posted March 29, 2019 Author Posted March 29, 2019 32 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: Letch - definition of letch by The Free Dictionary https://www.thefreedictionary.com/letch letch also lech (lĕch) n. 1. A strong, especially sexual desire or craving. 2. A lecher. [Perhaps back-formation from obsolete letcher, variant of lecher.] letch (lɛtʃ) vb, n a variant spelling of lech [C18: perhaps back formation from lecher] letch or lech (lɛtʃ) Slang. n. 1. a lecherous desire or craving. 2. a lecher. v.i. 3. to behave like a ... Just sayin'. Geez.
Nanker Posted March 29, 2019 Posted March 29, 2019 1 hour ago, 3rdnlng said: Biden is an equal opportunity letch. That just never gets old. “The Villages...”
3rdnlng Posted March 29, 2019 Posted March 29, 2019 5 minutes ago, Nanker said: That just never gets old. “The Villages...” It amazes me that Biden is so clueless that he thinks these little faux pas won't come back to hit him in the ass.
/dev/null Posted March 30, 2019 Posted March 30, 2019 42 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: It amazes me that Biden is so clueless that he thinks these little faux pas won't come back to hit him in the ass. Biden is old skool and remembers back when a complicit media industrial complex gave anyone with a (D) after their name a wink wink nudge nudge say no more free pass. Granted they still do that but in the age of the Internets, the great unwashed masses have access to information previously withheld
row_33 Posted March 30, 2019 Posted March 30, 2019 1 hour ago, Nanker said: That just never gets old. “The Villages...” Not that there’s anything wrong with these feelings
IDBillzFan Posted March 30, 2019 Posted March 30, 2019 This is actually kind of difficult to watch. Dude's not just a freak. He's a super freak.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted March 30, 2019 Posted March 30, 2019 23 minutes ago, LABillzFan said: This is actually kind of difficult to watch. Dude's not just a freak. He's a super freak. Chester the molester
LB3 Posted March 30, 2019 Posted March 30, 2019 16 hours ago, 3rdnlng said: Biden is an equal opportunity letch. Well that explains why Obama wanted to work so closely with him. 1
row_33 Posted March 30, 2019 Posted March 30, 2019 Dems are suckybabies who can't take losing,give them a crayon book and plush toy until the 2024 campaign beings
LSHMEAB Posted March 30, 2019 Posted March 30, 2019 18 hours ago, row_33 said: Joe isn't a bad option if the, shudder, other side has a chance to win and run the country..... Probably the best. Nominating Biden would be capitulation akin to McCain/Romney. I'm confident it's going to be Beto or Harris. And if you feel like Trump is a shoe in to win re-election, you may as well win some money on it. He's currently at +130, which means you win 130 for every 100 wagered. So bet 10K and walk away with 23K. In contrast, the D nominee is -160, which means you have to bet 160 to win 100 or 16K to win 10K. And I can assure you that the betting market isn't partisan.
/dev/null Posted March 30, 2019 Posted March 30, 2019 26 minutes ago, LSHMEAB said: Nominating Biden would be capitulation akin to McCain/Romney. I'm confident it's going to be Beto or Harris. And if you feel like Trump is a shoe in to win re-election, you may as well win some money on it. He's currently at +130, which means you win 130 for every 100 wagered. So bet 10K and walk away with 23K. In contrast, the D nominee is -160, which means you have to bet 160 to win 100 or 16K to win 10K. And I can assure you that the betting market isn't partisan. In 2016, the betting markets predicted an 80% chance that Clinton would be elected https://www.cnbc.com/2016/11/07/betting-sites-see-record-wagering-on-us-presidential-election.html However I do agree that Trump's re-election is far from certain
Deranged Rhino Posted March 30, 2019 Posted March 30, 2019 27 minutes ago, LSHMEAB said: Nominating Biden would be capitulation akin to McCain/Romney. I'm confident it's going to be Beto or Harris. And if you feel like Trump is a shoe in to win re-election, you may as well win some money on it. He's currently at +130, which means you win 130 for every 100 wagered. So bet 10K and walk away with 23K. In contrast, the D nominee is -160, which means you have to bet 160 to win 100 or 16K to win 10K. And I can assure you that the betting market isn't partisan. It sure was in November of 2016... Beto or Harris have zero shot to win nationally. Zero.
LSHMEAB Posted March 30, 2019 Posted March 30, 2019 3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: It sure was in November of 2016... Beto or Harris have zero shot to win nationally. Zero. Too much cash involved to play politics. But looking back, Trump was as high as +550, which is crazy. Basically 10K would have returned 65K! If they have no shot, you stand to make a killing.
Recommended Posts