3rdnlng Posted October 15, 2018 Posted October 15, 2018 On 10/15/2018 at 6:44 PM, Joe Miner said: If you'd like to participate in a bad land deal with me, we can cement your status. Expand I am a direct descendent of Peter Minuit, the guy who bought Manhattan and Long Island from Native Americans. If you want to do land deals with the Indians you might want to include me. I speak the language(s).
The_Dude Posted October 15, 2018 Posted October 15, 2018 Elizabeth Warren may be as much as 1/32 not white. This is huge. Pocahontas can now model herself a minority candidate on the ballot. Huge. Democrats hate white people so this just cannot be bigger news.
IDBillzFan Posted October 15, 2018 Posted October 15, 2018 (edited) Yeesh. Warren's plan really backfired. Kim Tallbear comments on how Fauxahontas is hurting Native Americans. Edited October 15, 2018 by LABillzFan 1 1
DC Tom Posted October 15, 2018 Posted October 15, 2018 On 10/15/2018 at 8:13 PM, LABillzFan said: Yeesh. Warren's plan really backfired. Kim Tallbear comments on how Fauxahontas is hurting Native Americans. Expand So the writer, as a cis-Aborigine, rejects Warren's claims to trans-Aboriginality because the colonial-settler paradigm of genetics denies the intersectionality of traditional Native American heritage and modern socio-economic inequality, which most Americans don't understand because they're ignorant of Native American Critical Theory? What. A. Bunch. Of. !@#$ing. bull ****. 1 2
Kevbeau Posted October 15, 2018 Posted October 15, 2018 On 10/15/2018 at 8:13 PM, LABillzFan said: Yeesh. Warren's plan really backfired. Kim Tallbear comments on how Fauxahontas is hurting Native Americans. Expand WTF did I just read? It's like standing between two mirrors. 2
TakeYouToTasker Posted October 15, 2018 Posted October 15, 2018 On 10/15/2018 at 8:13 PM, LABillzFan said: Yeesh. Warren's plan really backfired. Kim Tallbear comments on how Fauxahontas is hurting Native Americans. Expand 1 1
mead107 Posted October 15, 2018 Posted October 15, 2018 Meadspace ships should be ready in 2 years to take mad people off the planet ? that want to leave. Send me your deposit today. 1 1
Azalin Posted October 15, 2018 Posted October 15, 2018 On 10/15/2018 at 9:02 PM, DC Tom said: So the writer, as a cis-Aborigine, rejects Warren's claims to trans-Aboriginality because the colonial-settler paradigm of genetics denies the intersectionality of traditional Native American heritage and modern socio-economic inequality, which most Americans don't understand because they're ignorant of Native American Critical Theory? What. A. Bunch. Of. !@#$ing. bull ****. Expand 2
RochesterRob Posted October 15, 2018 Posted October 15, 2018 On 10/15/2018 at 3:53 PM, Deranged Rhino said: Expand Of course we will have this claim independently verified won't we?
Koko78 Posted October 16, 2018 Posted October 16, 2018 On 10/15/2018 at 8:13 PM, LABillzFan said: Yeesh. Warren's plan really backfired. Kim Tallbear comments on how Fauxahontas is hurting Native Americans. Expand At least the Canuckian B word managed to slip in a plug for her book at the end.
snafu Posted October 16, 2018 Author Posted October 16, 2018 On 10/15/2018 at 8:13 PM, LABillzFan said: Yeesh. Warren's plan really backfired. Kim Tallbear comments on how Fauxahontas is hurting Native Americans. Expand I'd pay more attention to Ms. Tallbear's opinion if she were a native American.
Koko78 Posted October 16, 2018 Posted October 16, 2018 On 10/16/2018 at 12:15 AM, snafu said: I'd pay more attention to Ms. Tallbear's opinion if she were a native American. Expand What, do you want her to take a DNA test? 1
snafu Posted October 16, 2018 Author Posted October 16, 2018 On 10/16/2018 at 12:25 AM, Koko78 said: What, do you want her to take a DNA test? Expand No, she's obviously Canadien. I don't think she's trying to come off as anything else.
IDBillzFan Posted October 16, 2018 Posted October 16, 2018 On 10/16/2018 at 12:28 AM, snafu said: No, she's obviously Canadien. I don't think she's trying to come off as anything else. Expand Have you seen her cheek bones? They're pretty high for a Canadian.
Heavy Kevi Posted October 16, 2018 Posted October 16, 2018 If the Dems win in November this year, it's not going to matter who runs on the D ticket, Trump will be re-elected. That said, they better come with someone besides Booker, Harris, Avenatti, Warren, or Clinton if they plan on giving Trump a real run. The only name I have heard given serious consideration that I believe could win is Biden. Biden could successfully debate Trump, not so much for the others. Or somebody we have never heard of, to come out of the blue. All the people I mentioned above would just lord-of-the-flies themselves in a primary. Booker is just unispiring and too choreographed and nobody is taking Harris seriously (nor should they). Warren ended it today with stating she is, in fact, native American even though she is half as native American as the average joe, Avenatti is down for the count after fake accuser Sweatnick, and Clinton is DONE. Like done done. She would not have abandoned he "nice" facade otherwise. Also, nobody mobilizes the republican base like Hillary; see election in 2016. If I was a democrat, I would be hoping for someone who could transcend the swamp, the obstruction, the impeachment nonsense, and focus on real governance instead of drama, branding, and scare tactics. These things worked for Trump because that's his brand, and he ran in the dispassionate R party. The dems will lose credibility and status as the self appointed "good guys" if they nominate someone like that.
IDBillzFan Posted October 16, 2018 Posted October 16, 2018 On 10/16/2018 at 12:32 AM, Shotgunner said: If I was a democrat, I would be hoping for someone who could transcend the swamp, the obstruction, the impeachment nonsense, and focus on real governance instead of drama, branding, and scare tactics. Expand They should look into the woman in Arizona who says Arizona is the meth lab of the United States. She sounds promising.
snafu Posted October 16, 2018 Author Posted October 16, 2018 On 10/16/2018 at 12:32 AM, Shotgunner said: If I was a democrat, I would be hoping for someone who could transcend the swamp, the obstruction, the impeachment nonsense, and focus on real governance instead of drama, branding, and scare tactics. These things worked for Trump because that's his brand, and he ran in the dispassionate R party. The dems will lose credibility and status as the self appointed "good guys" if they nominate someone like that. Expand So...not Al Gore?
Prickly Pete Posted October 16, 2018 Posted October 16, 2018 (edited) On 10/16/2018 at 12:32 AM, Shotgunner said: Expand Quote The only name I have heard given serious consideration that I believe could win is Biden. Biden could successfully debate Trump, not so much for the others. Expand Haha, you mean this guy.... Vs. this guy... Edited October 16, 2018 by OJ Tom 2
/dev/null Posted October 16, 2018 Posted October 16, 2018 On 10/16/2018 at 12:32 AM, Shotgunner said: The only name I have heard given serious consideration that I believe could win is Biden. Biden could successfully debate Trump, not so much for the others. Or somebody we have never heard of, to come out of the blue. Expand On 10/16/2018 at 12:42 AM, OJ Tom said: Haha, you mean this guy? Expand 1 1
Prickly Pete Posted October 16, 2018 Posted October 16, 2018 It's "Don't Tell anyone about this, and no one will get hurt" Vs. "Baby, I'm gonna make you a star" Hmm... 1
Recommended Posts