Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

He did not say "coaching trumps talent" which would seem to relate to players 

Strategy is  a coaching function.   When he says "culture trumps strategy" , the only logical assumption is there is something so important "culture" that we just have to live with occasional or more than occasional crappy game plans (strategy)

 

Strategy is  a coaching function.   When he says "culture trumps strategy", he is saying the coaching is good. The problems lie elsewhere. 

I am not saying he is wrong or right.  But that is what he pretty clearly saying. 

7 minutes ago, TheFunPolice said:

The "Patriot Way" is Brady throwing 5 yard passes to a QR who nobody is within 10 yards of when he catches the ball, and that WR then running for another 5-7 yards before being tackled. Once you stop that Brady throws screen passes to a RB who has nobody within 10 yards of him. If you stop both of those plays he tosses it up to a 7 foot tall TE for 20 yards a pop.

 

PEDs, cheating scandals, etc. are just footnotes.

 

This is why every season feels like a waste of time. Mahomes! Can you believe this kid! Trubisky! Watson! Baker!

 

The "young guns" throwing for 6 TDs a game and a billion yards, making insanely dramatic, athletic plays that defy physics!

 

And yet, we all know how it ends: a completely unathletic 41+ year old QB throwing screen passes all day to a 5 foot 10 WR who nobody can get within 10 yards of before he catches the ball. Then they run the same 3 plays over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over....

 

and nobody can stop it. "maybe NEXT YEAR for the young guns..." LOL

 

So have your cute little "culture" or have great strategy... It is going to take the PERFECT GAME or close to it to beat the machine known as NE. And I'm 100% convinced it is never going to end.

 

 

This is depressingly accurate. 

12 minutes ago, Shaw66 said:

Well, that's well put, and I agree to some extent. 

 

They've said it before - they will take not take a guy with talent who doesn't fit the culture.   So that means, I think, that they want to fill the locker room with guys who fit the culture, and they will improve the talent as they can.  I get that. 

 

However, I don't see why it should mean that you have to do that with coaching.   Why can't you have coaches who fit the culture and who ALSO are good at Xs and Os.   What some of us have been talking about is that the offense seems remarkably ineffective, and I think that's more about coaching than talent.   I mean, this talent on offense isn't going to light up everyone, but it should at least be able to SCORE once in a while.  Is McDermott telling us that  Daboll isn't so good at strategy, but he's good at culture and that's all the Bills need right now?   If so, I think McDermott is wrong.   This is his second offensive coordinator in two years, and he shouldn't have swung and missed twice at hiring someone who actually could figure out how to move the ball.  

Real question.  Why does anyone thing "strategy" means "talent"?  Am I the only one who thinks strategy refers to coaching? And that whatever culture means, it is more important than game planning ?  

Posted
3 hours ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

I don't buy this. 

 

Me neither.    The band on the Titanic had great culture, but their strategy should have been to grab something that floated...

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 3
Posted

I am also convinced that NE doesn't mind their typical slow starts to the season, just so everyone on sports talk will pronounce them done, fans will start to believe that, and that way it all hurts even more when they go 13-3 and win the Super Bowl, or at least get there so you feel nauseous the entire game at the thought of them winning.

 

Odd that Nick Foles and Eli Manning are the two QBs who stopped them from winning 8. Thank God Foles had the game of his life at just the right time!

 

Posted (edited)

Anyone talking about winning culture and stuff like that just doesn't know what they are talking about.

 

If anyone knew how to create a winning culture, everyone would just replicate it. It is complete bull ****. No one wants to lose, none of these guys are losers. Everyone on the 53 is an elite athlete who probably had a ton of success all through their childhood growing up, through high school, and probably some collegiate success. They're all competitive, it's all bull **** to me.

 

Strategy, and tactics absolutely trump that, every time. If the other team is smarter, has a better game plan, better prepared. I don't care how many times you have guys yelling on the sideline never say die.

 

Look at Josh Allen going over to the defense after they scored in the chargers game and yelling. Yea that was really !@#$ing cute, but they were never in that game. That image and moment alone proves McDermott wrong. No one has ever given LA credit for their winning culture.

 

Send this !@#$ing gym teacher packing. I can't stand listening to him talk.

Edited by Ol Dirty B
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 hours ago, teef said:

it's a combo of both.  i know some people that really don't buy into the culture idea, but i do.  i'm not talking the bean/mcdermott culture specifically, but just in general rather.  if you have a winning culture, i think a lot of the other points begin to fall in line.  i wouldn't say it's more important that strategy, but it's the holy trinity of culture, talent, and strategy.  

 

 

Yeah I value culture as well........but the problem with a culture based re-build is that a seamless transition then requires someone that the players trust will put them in position to win.

 

You hire a Marty Schottenheimer type who has proven he can win to do a culture based re-build and then hope the football evolves.

 

You hire a Sean McVay type to do a football based re-build and hope the culture develops FROM winning.

 

McD obviously felt that he didn't have the cred to pull off what he wanted to do without ridding his roster of skeptics..........and naturally your more talented players.....who are the least concerned about their own job security....... are the most likely to be openly skeptical of a lackluster hire.

 

So here we are.

 

A wanna-be Schottenheimer trying to fake it til' he makes it before his expiration date arrives.

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
37 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

Pegula could care less...you know the ones he actually reports to?

You have way less importance to this you you think you do....Pegula saw his team make the playoffs last year....you really think he gives a damn what you think this year?

He doesnt

 

Well, I don't know. 

Pegula might be all "Wooo!  Team made the playoffs last year!  Party!  This year, Anything Goes!"

I don't think Pegula cares what the fans per se think.  But then again, Pegula  (based on various) does seem to care if he's a laughingstock in the media.

 

I've said it elsewhere, and I'll say it here.  I think Pegula was prepared for a losing season this year, and had no intentions of making any changes.

But I think that intention was based on the assumption of fielding a competent team that played hard and just lacked the full talent to close the deal each week.  Sort of like AZ, which is 0-4 but, their 2 last games were decided by 3 points or less and where their offense last week under Rosen moved the ball and looked pretty good.

 

If the weekly embarrassments where the Bills are a laughingstock continue,  I think all bets are off.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted

Again, McD speaks like he's been given the reigns to a collegiate program.  I think he really believes this to be the case.  I also think the Pegulas never signed up for a 10 year cultural experiment and things are going to reach a fever pitch in November if linemen are still colliding with each other on running plays and their highly-invested young QB is on the sideline wearing a cast... 

 

I don't see McDermott lasting through next season, unless things change drastically and soon.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Coach Tuesday said:

Again, McD speaks like he's been given the reigns to a collegiate program.  I think he really believes this to be the case.  I also think the Pegulas never signed up for a 10 year cultural experiment and things are going to reach a fever pitch in November if linemen are still colliding with each other on running plays and their highly-invested young QB is on the sideline wearing a cast...

 

This is an interesting point.  The fan-obvious aspects of McBeane's strategy was to do personnel rebuild starting with heavy investment on D in draft and FA except for going all-in on a high draft pick QB. 

 

But, if that high draft pick QB is injured or stunted by the lack of investment/competence around him on offense, it's an obvious dud as a "business plan"

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

But, if that high draft pick QB is injured or stunted by the lack of investment/competence around him on offense, it's an obvious dud as a "business plan"

 

 

And you'll be able to cast that judgement before it even has a chance to come to fruition?

 

 

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, joesixpack said:

 

And you'll be able to cast that judgement before it even has a chance to come to fruition?

 

 

 

He already has taken more sacks than any other QB in the league and he started the season on the bench.  If this was the plan, it's a bad one, especially if it gets him injured.  Rosen would've been killed by now - if they had drafted Rosen he'd be filling out law school applications by this point.  Allen is built sturdier but this is madness.

Edited by Coach Tuesday
Posted
12 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

Well, I don't know. 

Pegula might be all "Wooo!  Team made the playoffs last year!  Party!  This year, Anything Goes!"

I don't think Pegula cares what the fans per se think.  But then again, Pegula  (based on various) does seem to care if he's a laughingstock in the media.

 

I've said it elsewhere, and I'll say it here.  I think Pegula was prepared for a losing season this year, and had no intentions of making any changes.

But I think that intention was based on the assumption of fielding a competent team that played hard and just lacked the full talent to close the deal each week.  Sort of like AZ, which is 0-4 but, their 2 last games were decided by 3 points or less and where their offense last week under Rosen moved the ball and looked pretty good.

 

If the weekly embarrassments where the Bills are a laughingstock continue,  I think all bets are off.

 

 

 

I agree, we have had our share of blow out losses the last couple years. That needs to end now. 

 

McD also needs to show he can develop Allen, if he can’t we need a young and innovative offensive head coach.

Posted
1 minute ago, Coach Tuesday said:

 

He already has taken more sacks than any other QB in the league and he started the season on the bench.  If this was the plan, it's a bad one, especially if it gets him injured.  Rosen would've been killed by now - if they had drafted Rosen he'd be filling out law school applications by this point.  Allen is built sturdier but this is madness.

 

So what's your plan?

 

Posted

I agree with him.  We haven't had a culture of winning since Levy.  It will be rough for a few years but if Allen can develop it's a starting block.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Coach Tuesday said:

 

He already has taken more sacks than any other QB in the league and he started the season on the bench.  If this was the plan, it's a bad one, especially if it gets him injured.  Rosen would've been killed by now - if they had drafted Rosen he'd be filling out law school applications by this point.  Allen is built sturdier but this is madness.

 

This is all on Dabol, if you ask me.  And if McDermott doesn't either make Dabol take his head out of his ass, or fire him, then it's on McDermott.

 

It doesn't have to be as bad as it is.  Asinine play calling has a) set Allen up to get killed and b) set the Bills up to lose.

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, joesixpack said:

 

So what's your plan?

 

 

My plan now?  Or my plan heading into the season?

 

My plan now would be to fire Juan Castillo if the blocking isn't fixed this Sunday.  I'd put McDermott on notice that he's not going to be the one hiring another offensive coordinator - the next coach will be doing that, so the offense had better shape up.  And I'd tell Beane (if they haven't already) that we're not in the business of building a church choir, and they've already pissed away $3M on a lottery ticket WR while there are street free agent WRs who would at least demonstrate some effort on passing downs, such as Kendall Wright, Rashard Matthews, and several others - the GM and his highly-touted (and well-paid) personnel department better find some players or they'll be looking for jobs in January as well.

 

In the meantime I'd also make it clear that if they don't fix the blocking and the scheme, they need to sign a QB who can manage this thing and absorb the pounding for the next 2.5 months.  If Matt Moore is too smart to subject himself to that, pick one of the other schlubs on the street and let them run the offense until the blocking situation is sorted.  But getting Allen injured is a one way ticket to pink slip land.

 

Also, I'd pull John Miller ASAP and put Teller in the lineup in his place.  John Miller is an abortion of a guard.

Edited by Coach Tuesday
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Coach Tuesday said:

 

My plan now?  Or my plan heading into the season?

 

My plan now would be to fire Juan Castillo if the blocking isn't fixed this Sunday.  I'd put McDermott on notice that he's not going to be the one hiring another offensive coordinator - the next coach will be doing that, so the offense had better shape up.  And I'd tell Beane (if they haven't already) that we're not in the business of building a church choir, and they've already pissed away $3M on a lottery ticket WR while there are street free agent WRs who would at least demonstrate some effort on passing downs, such as Kendall Wright, Rashard Matthews, and several others - the GM and his highly-touted (and well-paid) personnel department better find some players or they'll be looking for jobs in January as well.

 

In the meantime I'd also make it clear that if they don't fix the blocking and the scheme, they need to sign a QB who can manage this thing and absorb the pounding for the next 2.5 months.  If Matt Moore is too smart to subject himself to that, pick one of the other schlubs on the street and let them run the offense until the blocking situation is sorted.

 

Also, I'd pull John Miller ASAP and put Teller in the lineup in his place.  John Miller is an abortion of a guard.

 

So basically, threaten to fire him, if not fire him outright. More of the same. Thanks for the effort, I do appreciate you putting something forward, but it's kind of clear where your feelings about the current regime lie. You want to repeat the pattern of the past 20 years and give people three years or less. Nah, I'll pass.

 

×
×
  • Create New...