Jump to content

Owners with Conservative/Defensive Minded Coaches have some SOUL SEARCHING to do.


Recommended Posts

I don't care what other teams do or what might be trendy but defense always wins championships

 

A good defense can beat a good offense almost every single time

 

Look at Denver vs Carolina a few years ago, Seattle versus Denver a couple years ago... Defense wins championships

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HappyDays said:

I think the bigger thing those franchises did is they spent a ton of money on offense in the QB's sophomore seasons. Presumably that is our plan for next year too. 

That’s true, but the offensive cupboard was nowhere near as bare for those teams as it is for the Bills.  We literally need 7-9 new starters on offense and there are no promising young reserves on the bench.  It will be very difficult to get talented FA receivers to come to Buffalo, if there even are any available.  I don’t think this offense can be turned around in one offseason, especially by this bunch.  Best hope is that we have the 1 overall pick and can unload it for multiple premium picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, RalphWilson'sNewWar said:

 

No offense taken!

 

but I do wonder you say both Chicago and LA overhauled on Offense.  But wasn’t that mostly AFTER they hired Offensive Head Coaches?

 

so it was those Offensive Head Coaches who were possibly the driving factors in getting those organizations to focus on Offense in the Off Season?  And because they were offensive minded...they might have a better idea on scouting the potential offensive talent over a defensive coach?

 

 

also you question Trubisky is thriving in your 2.) point.  But at the end of it you admit he has more TD passes in 4 games in 2018 then he did in 12 games of 2017.  I would call that thriving.

 

No, it was because both the Rams and Bears already had a good defense in place and the offense was woeful.  In both cases, the Offensive talent was dismal while the defensive talent was high.  And this year, once they got more talent on the offense, they both went and added more talent to defense...rams in the secondary with Peters and Talib, and Bears went and got Mack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Haze_21 said:

1 game against a terrible pass d does not give trubisky thriving status.

 

And he sucked this year before it to the point people were looking to apply the bust label already (which is too early for that, but thats how bad he was before this week against the worst D in the NFL).  I mean the kid threw just SEVEN TD's last year...7...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said:

 

And he sucked this year before it to the point people were looking to apply the bust label already (which is too early for that, but thats how bad he was before this week against the worst D in the NFL).  I mean the kid threw just SEVEN TD's last year...7...

Yep. Being PATIENT doesn't mean being blind, but it's like the last game have made so many people forget how good Allen looked just one week prior and at many spots since he stepped on the field during preseason. And anyway, he's the QB we got, chill out people and support him! One game doesn't make or break a career

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jerome007 said:

Yep. Being PATIENT doesn't mean being blind, but it's like the last game have made so many people forget how good Allen looked just one week prior and at many spots since he stepped on the field during preseason. And anyway, he's the QB we got, chill out people and support him! One game doesn't make or break a career

 

This times a million.  Even in the GB game, once they stopped bringing the house later in the game and Allen had time and confidence to step into the pocket he was throwing strikes again.  

 

Biggest issue for him, is that to me it was very clear he had no confidence in his pass protection and would too quickly look to bail out of it and got himself into trouble too often.  The OL was not playing well, but at the same time, Allen looked to roll out of the pocket instead of trusting he could step into it.  So he compounded the poor OL performance sometimes with leaving it too early.  

 

Not a shock, this is a young QB in his 3rd start who felt like he had to do it all himself out there.  And thats what gets young QB's in trouble, when they focus on trying to get it all back on one play, one drive, etc...and try to do too much.  McD said it perfectly, he HAS to take what the D gives him one play at a time.  And he did that superbly in the Vikes game, but we were also ahead and he didnt need to try and do to much each play/drive.  

 

This will be a learning experience for him, I expect there will be other bad games like this during this season, but I also expect we will see flashed of what makes this kid special IMO too.  I love his tenacity, toughness, and intelligence...I have confidence he will take this week and get better from it.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Direhard Fan said:

No receivers.  No line.  Never planned on Allen being the guy this year.  What did you expect?   Loaded for next year with cap and picks.  Plan or not?  

Agree! I think McDermott has time because they realize that they will be able to acquire ALOT of talent next year through the draft and through the cap space that they will get after this year. We hate to think of rebuilding years...but this is a rebuilding year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mrags said:

Unfortunately Daboll hasn’t ever done anything worth bragging about. Our chances with him are slim. 

 

...the dichotomy of game plans is baffling.....even going back to the lathargic Dennison (hell even Fairchild), he'd dial up a game plan that blended TT's mobility and be successful...the following week was 180 suckitude......Daboll plan for the Vikes was ideal.....versatility and a nice blend of offensive play calling......followed by the GB stinker...Shady with 5 touches?....58 yards rushing total?.....I missed the memo I guess............

Edited by OldTimeAFLGuy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, CaptnCoke11 said:

It’s certsinly an interesting thought.  I’ve always banged the table for a young offensive minded coach.  

 

It is an interesting thought, but wasn't that supposed to be Marrone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, RalphWilson'sNewWar said:

 

Would you say Allen is more important to the franchise then McDermott?

 

if there is a pyramid (not counting owners) how does it start at the top and then work it’s wY down?

 

1.) Allen

2.) McDermott

3.) Bean

4.) White

5.) Edmunds

 

and if you agree with Allen being hire up than McDermott than anything to help Allen is greater than any loyalty to McDermott?

LOL. McDermott doesn't even crack the top 5 especially when considering the development of a young QB. 

1. Allen

2. Beane

3. Dawkins

4. Edmunds

5. OC

6. McDermott

7. White

8. Hughes

9. Future C

10. Future OLB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure why you included the Eagles in that. They didn't fire a defensive minded coach and hire an offensive minded coach after Wentz got there.

 

So you have two data points in the Rams and Bears, and only a few games have passed for the Bears in year two.

 

So no, there is not a trend.

Edited by MJS
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

 

...McVay did it right IMO.....who or what could be better than hiring Wade as your DC?..................

Word is McVay listens to the old man’s opinions on all matters. Brilliant 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, jahnyc said:

The Daboll hire was critical to get right.  It will be interesting to see if he can work well with Allen and help his development.

The track record was certainly not there. It was a middling hire at best and uninspired. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...